goatfarmer

Good luck to them.

Right. Most people seem to be disregarding this proviso. The only major omission I can see is France.

Chinese tourists down 30k, Israeli tourists up 10k. Seems like swings and balances.

And in the long term? .... Inflation pro tanto.

Try Nasol spray or Nasolin pills. I used both during the heavy congestion stage. Nasol spray should get you breathing easily at night.

I had it at the end of July and, out of curiosity tested (positive) for covid. Bingo! One day of fever, mild chills, a week of snotty congestion and a couple of weeks feeling a bit heavy. No big deal.

I have been taking an ice bath daily for the past few years. I add a 10kg bag of ice to the cold bath: it only brings temperature down to 22 or 23 degrees, but that's still quite a shock when taking the first plunge. It's quite relaxing and sucks out the heat of the day. I recently had shoulder surgery. The ice bath brings instant relief to aches and pains. So too does a hot bath 40 degrees. I recommend it.

"New research finds...." wouldn't be a headline that would worry me. Too vague and sensational. Lo and behold, the link doesn't link to any 'new research'.

My Thai house staff insist on wearing a mask when they go to the supermarket. The reason: because everyone else is wearing a mask. This sort of sequaciousness will perpetuate itself indefinitely. It has nothing to do with perception of risk, and everything to do with appearance.

Obviously it's up to the individual decision. The question is whether or not it's a rational decision. I've been to 8 countries since July last year. Only the occasional person wears a mask. I think if you see how the rest of the world is dealing with yesterday's emergency you might behave more rationally.

The term in Thai law is pretty well defined: (italics added) Section 6. Whoever, for the purpose of exploitation, commits any of the following acts: (1) procuring, buying, selling, vending, bringing from or sending to, detaining or confining, harbouring, or receipt of any person, by means of threat or use of force, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power, or giving money or benefits to a guardian or caretaker of the person to achieve the consent of the guardian or caretaker of such person to allow the offender to exploit the person under his or her control; or (2) procuring, buying, selling, vending, bringing from or sending to, detaining or confining, harbouring, or receipt of a child; shall be guilty of human trafficking. Merely giving a bus ticket or taking a paid person on a holiday would not fall within this definition. http://web.krisdika.go.th/data/outsitedata/outsite21/file/ANTI_HUMAN_TRAFFICKING_ACT,B.E._2551_(2008).pdf

Indeed. My maid was involved in such a scheme several years ago. Minimal education. No idea what she was getting involved with. Sucked in by a scammer telling her some <deleted> story about starting a company in Thailand and promising to be her boyfriend. She got arrested, carted off to Bangkok, incarcerated for a night and charged. Fortunately, when she turned up to court to hear her case, several weeks later, the charge had been dropped. Of course, all of this background merely goes to mitigation. There is no question she was guilty, but it seems pointless to pursue such naive, vulnerable, ignorant people who get sucked into a scam by unscrupulous operators who are the real culprits.

"The 1951 Refugee Convention is a key legal document and defines a refugee as: “someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”" Draft dodging would seem to imply opposing the war. Is that not 'membership of a particular social group' with 'a political opinion'?

Audi alteram partem: you can't draw a conclusion about what is going on until you hear both sides.

Yes. I was told that the first photos that I submitted were of too low resolution to be scanned.