-
Posts
14,756 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Posts posted by candide
-
-
34 minutes ago, Mick501 said:
Sweeping statement much? You have no idea how widespread WeChat usage is. Even sports teams use it as their group chat of preference.
Sports leagues, I.e. NBA, use it to communicate with fans in CHINA.
You have nothing to support your ridiculous claim that WeChat usage is widespread for communication between non-Chinese in the USA.
-
48 minutes ago, MajarTheLion said:
Of course. And do you think for a moment if it were a Democrat in Trump's shoes that they would be calling for delaying the pick until after the election?
Remember the words of one of the left's most brilliant politicians ever: "elections have consequences".
I agree with you. I was commenting on a post claiming that a made up "McConnell rule" should be respected.
- 1
-
2 hours ago, Mick501 said:
The comment re business people etc was more aimed at WeChat. Only got to look at Hilary to see how blind many are to the threat of state based cyber theft, and WeChat remains in wide use. Easy to imagine Biden accidentally sending any amount of information, and with his China First policies, there's no way he would have taken this step.
Most people who use WeChat are either Chinese, or communicating with Chinese friends/relatives, or doing business with China. In any case they are usually quite aware about how it works in China and surely know they need to be cautious. Nobody uses it for communicating between non-Chinese.
Additionally, what is the "China first" policy of Biden?
- 1
-
5 hours ago, Publicus said:
No matter how you slice it, it's still baloney.
Because where I come from it's called the Five Minute Rule. It was a rule for the 5 minutes it took McConnel to say it then walk off to end the rule forever.
That's why baloney is still called baloney.
And had the situation been different, they would have made up a different rule.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, riclag said:“Americans can now confidently vote by mail and have their voices heard.”
Americans can now feel confident ,while both parties are lawyering up!
"The bottom line: Legal disputes over results are less likely to succeed in any states with landslides — but any close election contests will almost certainly be litigated".
https://www.axios.com/2020-election-lawsuits-de329dcc-97d1-46e9-9a9d-11197fd1e6a9.html
When and if it comes time,I just hope my team's lawyers are better than theirs !
One thing is certain voting by a mass mail in, on a large scale certainly has challenges and controversy according to reports!
"The coronavirus created once-in-a-generation challenges for how elections are run, so officials across the country have rushed to implement new policies and scale up mail-in voting".
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/20/politics/absentee-voting-election-problems/index.html
What could possibly go wrong imop
And in order to make sure it goes wrong, nothing's better than cutting postal office funding and reducing its processing capacity! ????
- 2
- 2
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
15 minutes ago, riclag said:Oh ya! You seem confused! Sad! You need to go back and read the story ,by reuters! Nice try!
"Wray's testimony follows an Aug. 7 warning by the director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center that Russia, China and Iran were all trying to interfere in the Nov. 3 election".
So let's wait for his testimony about China's interference in the election.
- 3
-
16 minutes ago, Lacessit said:
Relevant intelligence agencies are unlikely to provide support by confirming their intelligence material. That's possibly tipping off the Iranians they have spies in their camp. If Trump says it's a bad deal, it's just dismissed by them as his usual erratic conduct.
Trump is a sociopath, narcissistic, and vindictive. However, I don't think I've ever called him stupid.
Iran is controllled by the IAEA, which has intrusive investigation power. The US could have discretely leaked information and told them where to investigate.
If there was really some intelligence material, it could also have been given to some of the other signatories. Not to Russia, of course, but I guess to countries such as the UK, which is already more or less integrated in the US intelligence system.
None of it happened. Only Trump's word.
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
7 hours ago, riclag said:"The greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality, is the counterintelligence and economic espionage threat from China. It’s a threat to our economic security—and by extension, to our national security".
Thanks for confirming that what Wray said about China was true. So I guess what he said about Russia must be true, too?
- 3
-
26 minutes ago, Geoffggi said:
You have to admire them, only our friends the Americans can be one of the instigators in such a situation, {Some people really are their own worst enemy} If only some government workers would work as hard at working for the country as opposed to working against the incumbent government (No matter who they are) the population as a whole benefit & progress in leaps and bounds .....!!!!!
So, for an intelligence organisation, dealing with intelligence issues is not "working for the country"? Lol!
-
4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:
His party, the Democrats, control Congress, and it is Congress who hold the Constitutional authority to enact trade deals.
The United States has already demanded and been granted a U-Turn on UK plans to tax online businesses - ie is dictating the bounds of U.K. tax laws. I suggest Brexiteers learn to like it.
Brexit will mean FRINO to a large extent!
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
8 minutes ago, vogie said:Only time will tell, the EU is like a cult, the UK has led the way and now other nations can see that it is possible for a country to escape the dysfunctual EU, you just need bottle. You have only to mention anything negative about the EU and its members are like ants trying to stop an invader into their nest, 'it's not true, we love Ursula' kill intruder, kill intruder.
Brexiters accusing the EU of being like a cult, lol!
Only time will tell, you are right. However, up to now, Brexit had a rather deterring effect on the idea of leaving, as people were becoming more aware of the real consequences of exiting.
- 4
-
On 9/14/2020 at 11:44 AM, Megasin1 said:
All these countries around the world squabbling about ocean rights with the big aggressive countries, basically doing what they want unchecked. Soon after we have left the EU, Turkey will be admitted by the sops that run the EU and will then no doubt use their position within the EU to leverage a lot more ocean grabbing. As the worlds resources dwindle the squabbling and military activity will increase. There is absolutely no need at all to go to Mars, pretty soon you will be able to see it all here, barren and red.....what a crazy, crazy world our poor kids will inherit. I wonder if the Chinese will also apply to join the EU???
In case you didn't notice, the " sops that run the EU" are the elected governments of its member States.
-
- Popular Post
19 minutes ago, Smigel said:I beg to differ, both Biden and Pelosi labelled Trumps ban on travel from China and slightly later the EU, xenophobic.
Pelosi openly encouraged travel to Chinatown, proclaiming it perfectly safe to do so.
Why are you openly lying.?
Your claim is not backed by anything. Show us a quote by Biden and Pelosi mentioning the CHINA travel ban. There is none. Good luck if you want to try.
(The reason I write CHINA is because they did call him racist or xenophobic several times about immigration issues, I.e. the so-called Muslim bans -the latest was announced on Jan.31)
As to Pelosi going to Chinatown, as I wrote before, it was not to protest against Trumps decision, it was, as you yourself state, to show it was safe to do so. As you know, in Chinatown, most inhabitants are US citizen, and voters too. People were afraid to go there, shops and restaurants were empty. Nothing surprising for a political figure to try to help her electorate.
Who's lying? Trump, by claiming he courageously made his decision among widespread opposition. There was no particular opposition to it and plenty of other countries made the same decision at the same time or even before.
- 3
-
- Popular Post
6 hours ago, JonnyF said:The EU encouraging others to open up markets? That's rich coming the protectionist racket that is the EU. Their reison d'être IS the single market.????
Also interesting that they can do a billion Euros a day trade with China without a trade deal. Yet they expect the UK to hand over sovereignty and fishing waters for a substandard FTA to buy their goods.
Also accusing China of breaking global trade rules when their own states cannot even follow EU treaties and the EU themselves break their own rules on state aid when it comes to bailing out failing Italian banks and Airbus.????
The EU, the hub of hypocrisy.
The usual Brexiters' fake claim. The level of EU protectionism is currently similar to that of other developped countries. (Plus plenty of FTAs and similar agreements already signed or under negotiation.)
- 4
- 2
-
5 minutes ago, Poet said:
Okay. What action did they take in 1989, and what actions are they threatening to take now?
Before making inaccurate statements, it's worth spending 5 minutes on Google search.....
They decided an embargo on arms.
Over the years, there have been several complaints made to the WTO, special tariffs imposed, some cases are still ongoing (transfer of technology, for example).
- 1
-
- Popular Post
17 minutes ago, Poet said:
The EU never did anything about China, not even after Tiananmen. The only reason they are saying anything now is because the US made it an issue, but they are not actually threatening to do anything.
After World War II, the US kickstarted the reconstruction of Europe with the Marshall Plan, pumping $12 billion into Europe ($129 billion in today's money) and saving the continent from decades of economic depression.
Since 1949 they have spent billions every year on NATO, the whole purpose of which was to hold Western Europe together and protect it from a massive hostile neighbor.
The US was also the main supporter and sponsor of the progenitors of today's EU.
It shocks me that people have such wild views based purely on whatever opinions are currently fashionable (this year all the cool kids hate America) but so little awareness of how their own societies came into being and who helped them to get there.
What you claim in the first paragraph is not true (both sentences).
What you state after that is true. However, the current US administration is not particularly pro-EU.
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, Rookiescot said:Treasure island. Wow thanks for that. Its the best laugh I've had in a while.
OK so apart from Japan, which by the way is not ratified yet, which major trading blocks or countries do we have a FTA with? Why yes. Its zero. And as for the much vaunted Japan deal. According to the FT its a far better deal for Japan than it is for us. Trade with Japan accounts for a mighty 2% of our exports.
The article also states.
https://www.ft.com/content/edb7d155-56b4-4065-9f83-31b2247fa178
"The UK’s new trade deal with Japan commits it to tougher restrictions on state aid than the ones it is currently offering the EU in the Brexit talks, potentially undermining its negotiating position with Brussels. In the bilateral UK-Japan agreement announced in principle on Friday, London and Tokyo have agreed to replicate the restrictions on subsidies in the EU-Japan deal that went into effect last year. That agreement prohibits the governments from indefinitely guaranteeing the debts of struggling companies or providing an open-ended bailout without a clear restructuring plan in place. By contrast, the UK has repeatedly told the EU that it must have total freedom over state aid after the end of the Brexit transition period with complete autonomy over future subsidy decisions, subject to WTO rules."What was that you were saying about sovereignty? ????
So come January we will be trading with almost everyone on WTO terms. That means tariffs. More importantly it means tariffs on goods to and from the EU. Our biggest trading partner. Do you think companies in the UK can find new markets overnight?
While part of the EU we were already trading globally. So any opportunities to sell British goods anywhere was already being done.
Hey we could very well have gotten more out of the corona bail out fund than we put in given our economy has been the hardest hit in the EU.
If you think for a second American healthcare was going to stop at just selling medication then you are deluded mate. Trump said as much. Everything is up for grabs.
For the EU the difference between us, Canada, the USA, South Korea etc is the amount of trade done. What the Torys dream of is turning the UK into a cheap labour paradise with little or no workers rights.
My point about sovereignty obviously went right over your head. You point to it like its some kind of holly grail for doing Brexit. I dont think any of you have a clue as to what sovereignty actually means. Its just a buzz word you guys throw around.
Enjoy your Polish made passport ????.
Brilliant! UK abdicating its sovereignty to the Land of the Rising Sun.
To the Krauts, never! But to the Japs, ok! ????
- 2
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
Happy memories! ????
'Fantastic moment': Boris Johnson signs Brexit withdrawal deal
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jan/24/sombre-eu-leaders-sign-brexit-withdrawal-agreement
- 3
- 1
-
2 hours ago, CorpusChristie said:
Isnt that the situation between North and South Korea ?
I checked. You are right.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, CorpusChristie said:
Good news, North Korea and the USA are not actually at war .
Dont think they ever have been .
The was previous hostilities between USA and NK , that had been going on for 50 odd years .
Trump has managed to pacify NK , he did that whereas all previous POTUS had failed .
NK was/is a rogue state , Trump quietened him down a bit
Well, technically, it's still only a truce.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
3 minutes ago, Poet said:Seriously, you don't remember Pelosi dramatic appearance in Chinatown to protest his decision, and inviting everyone in San Francisco to come join her?
I'm pretty sure Biden called it racist too, because that was the Democrat line at that time, around the end of February. Fairly standard rhetoric in these times.
Trump can be criticized for plenty of things, include later aspects of the covid response, why pick on something he happened to get right?
Pelosi did not go to Chinatown to protest his decision. She went there because people were afraid to go there although there was no coronavirus in Chinatown at that time. Pelosi and Biden called Trump a racist many times over the years, in particular because of his statements about immigrants and the so-called Muslim travel bans (including the last one on Jan. 31). As I wrote before, if you want to find a quote mentioning the CHINA travel ban, good luck to you!
Trump was right to implement travel restrictions, but his claim that he courageously decided it against the opinion of everyone else is false. There was no particular opposition to it in the US, and around 50 other countries implemented a travel ban at about the same time or before
- 4
-
1 hour ago, DaftToPutRealName said:
Many of his most vocal critics around the Chinese Flu are the same ones which called him racist earlier in the year for suggesting that they close flights to China and which said the WHO showed no evidence of it being dangerous....
Unfortunately these days they will find literally any reason to blame him for something - regardless of the facts. When the media gets their weekly buzzword it's a sight to behold how coordinated each and every outlet seems to be with stuffing it in every key sentence, and then it's just a matter of repeating it over and over again to make it truth.Which is exactly what you are doing (repeating it over and over again to make it truth).
You will not find any quote from Pelosi or Biden mentioning the CHINA travel ban, nor saying that the WHO showed no evidence etc....
BTW are you aware that it's Trump who downplayed the epidemic, stating that Dems were creating panic?
- 2
-
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, 7by7 said:It wasn't your so called Remainer Parliament which signed the withdrawal agreement on the 24th January 2020; it was Johnson with his 50 seat majority!
It wasn't your so called Remainer Parliament which went into the last GE saying they had an oven ready deal with the EU; it was Johnson.
Johnson and his puppet master lied to us in 2016; and they're still at it.
Blaming others is the essence of Brexiting. I bet that, after Jan. 1st, they will still put the blame on remainers, the EU, etc...
- 7
- 2
-
5 hours ago, 3NUMBAS said:
10.15am update: Donald Trump confronts Merkel with damning verdict on EU
Donald Trump told Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel the EU was "worse than China only smaller" and treats the US "horribly" during a tense meeting, a former senior Whitehouse official has said.
John Bolton, who was the President's National Security Advisor until last year when he left his post in acrimonious circumstances, makes the startling revelation in his new book The Room Where It Happened.
Mr Bolton also reveals the President's contempt for former European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, whom Mr Trump regarded as "vicious" and full of "hatred" for the US.
I guess they have felt flattered! ????
Biden leads Trump by 12 points nationally among likely voters - Reuters/Ipsos poll
in World News
Posted · Edited by candide
Lol! You conveniently picked up the only polling organisation which systematically gives higher scores to Trump than other organisations.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
No particular improvement for Trump in all other polls.