StraightTalk

There are plenty of accurate sources embedded into the Internet of which their content is virtually impossible to dilute. IMHO there are watchdogs observing this exact scenario; Gathering and then erasing history instantaneously at once may be the only option for AI but I doubt it very much. The schools anywhere only teach curriculum prescribed by their respective nations/states. And I dare say that none of programmes or courses communicate history accurately because of various individual, religious and ideological biases.

If you believed that to be true you would have posted a pertinent link

I reiterate, you've got me there. You really, really, really make a lot of sense.

A simple search on the Internet suggests otherwise.

Hmm, you've got me there. You really make lot of sense.

Similar to Talon Anvil?

Okay, you made your point and be happy in your real world. Have a wonderful day.

"He could have" - Yes, a modal verb for lost opportunity. Applies to all parties involved.

I am completely at ease if you're happy with your interpretation. That Putin wasn't bluffing needs no further explanation.

[quote] "implicit and informal assurances in 1990 strongly suggesting" to a country that no longer exists[...]" [unquote] Obviously the promise(s) were made prior the SU leader(s) decided on dismantling the Union. The Russian leader(s) have the right that these promise(s) is/are honored. Concerning expressing an opinion based on incomplete evidence - We just have to wait until respective documents are available and publicized under the Freedom of Information Act (which is not made known in newspapers with half-size pages). In the meantime I have mine and others have theirs - Respect!

He wasn't.

It was an addition to my previous response to sammieuk1 - hardly and act of trolling.

Thanks for the link. Well, he wasn't bluffing, was he?

...and relies on emoticons for expressing him/her selves.

I don't know and don't recall reading about it.