Fact

Sounds like you are not good at making any points.

If a group calling themselves ANTIFA engages in violence, they are an organization.

Good question — there’s a bit of nuance here. The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) has never been formally designated as a “terrorist organization” in the same way that foreign groups like al-Qaeda or ISIS are, because U.S. law only has a legal designation system for foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs), not for domestic ones. That said: As early as the 1870s, the U.S. government recognized the KKK’s violence as terrorism. Congress passed the Enforcement Acts (including the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871), which gave the president power to use federal troops and suspend habeas corpus to suppress Klan violence. The FBI and the Department of Justice have long treated KKK violence as domestic terrorism under the U.S. Code definition (18 U.S.C. § 2331), even if there isn’t an “official designation” system. In modern counterterrorism discussions, scholars, journalists, and federal agencies frequently describe the KKK as America’s oldest terrorist group. 👉 So the short answer: the KKK has been treated as a domestic terrorist threat since the 19th century, but it has never had a formal “terrorist organization” designation because U.S. law doesn’t allow for designating domestic groups that way. Do you want me to break down the legal definition of domestic terrorism and show exactly how KKK actions fit under it?

ANTIFA is a group of individuals known for engaging mayhem. How are they fighting fascism?

You are full of delusional babble.

You are delusional. You ignore what the quote anti-fascists unquote do in reality. It's akin to an anti racism group of white people that spends its time attacking blacks.

it's an accurate simulation of how the left debates.

Would you happen to remember?

It is the peak of his life in Thailand. Someone finally noticed him.

Next time, make sure to pay for the services provided, and this situation won't occur again.

Stop posting from Russia.

The European approach to addressing terrorism involves appeasing terrorists.

The term "fascism" is increasingly used, but it does not correlate with true fascism.

nine eminent German health experts Dr. Dirk Volker Seeling, a psychologist Prof. Dr. Gerald Dyker, an organic chemistry professor Dr. Andreas Sönnichsen, a professor of internal medicine Dr. Kurt E. Müller, a dermatologist and Prof. Dr. Konstantin Beck, a Swiss economist Dr. Michael Nehls, a molecular geneticist (Dr. Nehls said severe illness comes from cytokine storms, not viruses) Dr. Erich Freisleben, an internal medicine doctor Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Schubert, a medical psychology and psychoneuroimmunology Christina Delprete, a pharmacist from Switzerland, Which one of the listed experts is the "expert"

That’s a crime. Why does the government do that?

The kid didn’t have much of a social media presence.

To this day there is very little information on that kid.

The original poster makes a valid point; black areas are associated with high gun crime rates. Despite accounting for only 14% of the U.S. population, Black people account for 60% of those killed by firearm homicide each year. On average, Black people are over 11.5 times more likely to be victims of firearm homicide than their non-Hispanic white peers. https://www.bradyunited.org/resources/research/disproportionate-impact-gun-violence-black-americans

Trickly down is what the non-thinking left wing calls it.

Do you mean supply-side economics? Supply-side economics is a macroeconomic theory postulating that economic growth can be most effectively fostered by lowering taxes, decreasing regulation, and allowing free trade.[1][2] According to supply-side economics theory, consumers will benefit from greater supply of goods and services at lower prices, and employment will increase.[3] Supply-side fiscal policies are designed to increase aggregate supply, as opposed to aggregate demand, thereby expanding output and employment while lowering prices. Such policies are of several general varieties: Investments in human capital, such as education, healthcare, and encouraging the transfer of technologies and business processes, to improve productivity (output per worker). Encouraging globalized free trade via containerization is a major recent example. Tax reduction, to provide incentives to work, invest and take risks. Lowering income tax rates and eliminating or lowering tariffs are examples of such policies. Investments in new capital equipment and research and development (R&D), to further improve productivity. Allowing businesses to depreciate capital equipment more rapidly (e.g., over one year as opposed to 10) gives them an immediate financial incentive to invest in such equipment. Reduction in government regulations, to encourage business formation and expansion.[4]

Can they replicate the propagation conditions?

What is ‘Trickle Down’?