Jump to content

GlutinousMaximus

Member
  • Posts

    115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GlutinousMaximus

  1. The only possible explanation for what we see and have to negotiate on thai roads is that at the moment many/most thai drivers turn on their engine the key they are holding simultaneously turns off their brain.

    I also believe that some cultural traits in the Thai make-up do not lend themselves to being able to manage a vehicle in any kind of proper way. The interesting thing is that plenty of thai drivers are okay and can negotiate their vehicles without endangering other road-users and without causing conditions for possible road-rage.

    I personally believe in the power of education, and we all know that passing the driving test here is hardly complicated, and that's assuming that individual citizens have decided to even bother with taking this test.

    I have often wondered if, just for one month, what would happen if a whole bunch of thai drivers were plonked onto the streets of england, and a whole heap of english drivers were plonked onto the streets of thailand. I believe in both countries there would be a significant decrease in the populations - in england people would be killed by dangerous drivers and in thailand people would be killed from the massive rise in road rage.

    I think it is very insulting to state that thai drivers turn off their brain when they start there car. Maybe just a superior farang joke?

    They have a different 'system' of driving that incomers need to adjust to. By and large it works. (Yes I know all about all the road safety stats here).

    Sometimes their driving style drives me crazy but I accept that it works.

    For the many hours I drive both in and out of the city and long distances, I see very very few accidents. Because people use their brain to avoid accidents.

    Many countries evolve different driving styles/systems.In the UK its never ok to run a red or overtake on the inside. In the US in many places its ok to turn on a red if the way is clear. Like here. And overtaking on the inside in the US seems normal.

    When in Rome, ..... adapt.

    What a joke - these roads are lethal. I consider driving on Thai roads at about the same risk level as an extreme sport such as paragliding or potholing or somesuch. Reasonably safe if you know what you're doing and have some experience, but plenty of scope for things to go wrong at the drop of a hat.
    Accidents happen in farangland too, but driving there is way more predictable IMO.
    When I drive now, I'm on a constant state of high alert. Anyone or anything in front of me (I have to assume) could randomly pull into my path at any time whatsoever without warning.
    I concur with willfreeman, pootling around town is OK on the whole (from a safety viewpoint). The real danger is on the open road.
  2. From the mugshot/ID card photo it looks like (s)he is wearing coloured contacts.


    I'm surprised you're allowed to take an ID photo with fake-coloured eyes - not exactly reliable for identification purposes is it?

  3. "I've already watched all 4 episodes of 'Game of Thrones'."

    admitting to illegally pirating a tv show, good for you. The world needs more thieves and deviants.

    How's the atmosphere up there on your moral high horse?
    The GOT 5 episodes have already been downloaded 5 million times - sure is a lot of "deviants"
    • Like 1
  4. Road deaths and other road safety issues COST a country millions - if they get the 5 Es together they'll save a fortune.

    Just this once cumgramosalum I'm gonna have to agree with you!

    Reducing RTAs makes sound economic sense as well as alleviating the tremendous burden of suffering they cause plus stressing of the family support networks common in LOS.

    • Like 2
  5. Much of China's population is still poor by western standards despite govt spending on infrastructure, so in that respect, theyre a developing country.

    As for Thailand, you seem to imply that it's not difficult to implement the laundry list of corrective measures that are so ineffectively enforced in your own country. Who do you think is going to pay for all these improvements in Thailand (extra personnel, training, equipment installation, increase judicial involvement, etc).

    You and others on TV complaining about Thailand aren't really looking at the bigger picture but rather have a myopic pov reminiscent of the Tea Party.

    Ineffectively enforced in the UK? You're dreaming aren't you, the UK police force is very efficient and has low levels of corruption (at least at the level of traffic officers). It's not even a requirement to have police involvement anymore (for managing speed at least), as automated extended speed cameras are being rolled out over large sections of the motorway network - see: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/11375836/Stealth-speed-cameras-to-be-deployed-on-300-miles-of-motorway.html
    Automated speed cameras soon become self-funding from the revenue they generate.
    The Thai Highway Police can already afford to drive about in swanky Honda Accords, making a few of them incognito is no great stretch.
    Even if some of these measures were cherry-picked for Thailand, it would be a start.
    I'm under no illusion that it's going to happen anytime soon however as there seems to be no will to do so.
  6. Using the term 'third world country' is a pathetic excuse for negligence. As is stated above, Thailand has had many opportunities to improve and offers of help, and declined. It is the ignorance and insularity of the people, and that is down to a system that, again as mentioned, hides them from reality. We all accept when living in a foreign country ( I have lived and worked in over 20) that we accept their laws and customs. It does seem that we are the only ones that do this. We have every right to comment on matters of personal safety be they actual or potential. The one law that everyone is subject to, no matter where you live is the laws of physics and that seems to target a lot of Thais on the road.

    The reality is youre in a country far less developed than your own, and to expect the same level of standards or anything even close is beyond naive if not ignorant. Complaining about everything simply feeds into your negative, close-minded perceptions about Thailand and its people. You claim to have worked in over 20 countries yet appear to lack basic empathy and common sense about the realities of your surroundings.

    I for one find Thai drivers very patient if not accommodating toward other motorists. Sure there are aggressive Thai drivers who probably drive recklessly just like anywhere else, but for the sheer amount of scooters, motorcycles, cars and trucks the sharing roads that are often too narrow and not well maintained, it's quite amazing there arent even more traffic accidents that occur.

    Thailand is not a 3rd world country anymore and as it's joining ASEAN soon, needs to consider raising its game somewhat. Is China a developing country for example? I don't think you can say that anymore and within 10 years won't be able to say it of Thailand either. A country that is perfectly able to build high-quality road networks (as Thailand is) needs to impose the rule of law for their safe operation so that people and goods from across the wider region can navigate it safely.
    It ain't rocket science - more stringent licencing requirements, punitive points-based system on licences, speed cameras, enforced drug/alcohol testing at the scene of any accident, unmarked camera-equipped police cars cruising the roadways, stiffer sentences for the most serious traffic offences. Just take a leaf out of the UK's playbook for starters. Even if this was rolled out to the inter-provincial road network initially, it would be a good first step. All of the above are easily within Thailand's gift to accomplish.
    I used to think the UK had a heavy-handed approach to enforcing road safety (and I speak as someone who's flouted a fair few regs myself), but having been over here and seeing what happens in its absence, I'm all for it. If I ever go back to the UK it's good to know that some boy racer popping an E and getting into his souped up Fiesta now has to think twice about it (thanks to the new drugalysers currently being rolled out).
    • Like 1
  7. Almost every point here is a case of perception (in particular that of a foreigner) over reality.......it is this kind of thinking that clouds people seeing the reality of what is happening on Thai roads

    I'm not sure what reality you're referring to.
    I (and many other posters) have in fact 2 sets of reality to judge by - driving in farangland and driving over here.
    If a car hits you, it's real-world physics in action regardless of whether you're a Thai or a farang.
    • Like 1
  8. Yet both countries have about the same number of RTCs”

    Whilst I agree that the collection of stats is highly dubious anywhere and Thailand must rate as one of the worst in this field, if one follows that logic, we have to ignore all stats re motoring. I think the problem lies only partly with the stats themselves and the way they are gathered...it is also the way they are interpreted that is also severely flawed.

    As according to some or one set of figures Thailand has the highest death rate per 100 k of population, the general interpretation is that driving in Thailand must be very dangerous. I don’t see this as a naturally logical progression of reason, however I do think it is a good indicator of the situation here.

    When it comes to counting collisions - I have to say yet again that anecdote is not data, and I firmly believe there is an important factor there. However I know personally that for various reasons in UK, Europe and Australia, that collisions go unreported regularly - largely to avoid massive insurance bureaucracy and possible traffic /vehicle infringements. - Splitting hairs over stats is of course a complete waste of time especially with road safety, where so many, many factors are involved.

    There also seems to be a preponderance of people on this and other threads who rather than seriously look into the topic of road safety like to draw erroneous and single-issue solutions based on their own untutored observations......

    Some posts are simply “giving examples” this is just silly - telling anecdotes about motoring horror stories that are selected to back up a pre-held view that is at best myopic and can hardly be taken seriously - I could tell similar stories about any country in the world.

    People like to blame individuals for what they perceive as bad driving, when the reality is far more complex than that and often they are applying principles that are themselves are quite outdated or ill-informed.

    Many posters are also making derogatory assumptions about “how Thais think” - this is both ignorant and racist.

    There are 65 million or so people in Thailand and to suggest that you know how everyone thinks is just plain daft.

    Another aspect here is that people love to bandy about the word “culture” - when they are in reality just using it as a substitute for their own prejudiced view.

    Culture is NOT a static thing, neither are the demographics and attitudes of drivers on Thai roads.

    There is one interesting point though that is occasionally touched upon by those who really research Thai culture; check out “Very Thai” for instance. Here they allude to the cultural HISTORY of transport in Thailand and point out that unlike Europe and USA, who in general, graduated slowly from horses and carts to automobiles, Thailand has switched to automobiles vey rapidly (in no more than 2 generations) and not from horses and carts, but from BOATS. If you take time to consider many of the Thai driving ways and more and mays and mights, you’ll see they have a remarkable resemblance to how one pilots a boat on a river.

    I wonder why there are no forums like 'My UK M6 horror stories' - it's because nobody has any to share.
    I've driven extensively in the UK and fairly extensively in Thailand (at least up in the North East). Going by my own experience, I've had hairy / near miss scenarios if not on a daily basis, certainly a weekly one (none that I can recall about driving in the UK). Part of that may be down to infrastructure, UK motorway driving is very predictable for example; intersections are designed with safety in mind, and you don't have the crazy mix of bicycles, mopeds, pedestrians, buffaloes, cows, dogs, ducks etc. that you do over here.
    I've always felt that driving (in any country) is the most dangerous activity you can engage in. Here, my perception is that the risk is tripled or quadrupled. I'm sure most posters here feel the same - their own real-world experience tells them just how risky driving here is. I haven't seen overturned vehicles by the side of the road on a single journey in the UK - I've seen it here regularly. I live in a medium size town in the NE and have heard several anecdotes (i.e. in the region of 10 or more) of relatives or friends of people in our social network who were injured or killed in serious RTAs, for the UK I can recall one incident and that was 30 years ago.
    Over here, you have to give the road 100% of your attention - if you're not on your driving A-game, you can bet the other guy won't be. In the UK, you can rely a bit more on the drivers around you if you have a wobbly.
    As you say, it doesn't do to make derogatory assumptions about the locals, nevertheless judging by the road-going behaviours I see around me on a daily basis, it's hard not to let those experiences colour your view. Some other TV poster started a thread a while back 'Have you changed your viewpoint of Thais and Thailand since arriving' - for me it's a definite yes and it's been the roads wot done it.
    Culture is NOT a static thing, neither are the demographics and attitudes of drivers on Thai roads.
    You can say that again - the last thing the locals are on the roads is static!
    • Like 1
  9. None of it will change until and unless organised measures to curb the carnage come from the top.


    There is a strong Darwinian selection pressure at work on the roads here. Within 50 years, only Thai dogs that have road-crossing smarts will be alive to pass on their genes, the rest will all be wiped out within a very rapid evolutionary timeframe.


    Similarly, a certain optimal driving style in humans will mean a higher chance of passing on your genes. I'm not sure what that style is - I'm still trying to work it out on a daily basis!

    • Like 1
  10. I drive a Nissan Teana 230 JS. Maybe he thought he did have "precedence," as you say. I have no figures to back this up, but my gut feeling is that SUV drivers tend to be more aggressive here.

    Also, depending on the tint of your windows, he may not have realised you were a farang (I'm presuming that you are) and so to him you may have represented a socially inferior local that was giving him attitude hence his anger.
    I have the feeling that social patterns of status deference are carried over and even magnified once people are in their cars (depending on the model they drive).
    The above is of course all conjecture, but it's one possible interpretation.
  11. Too many Whingers, who haven't driven in other crazy countries.Its not that bad, just play the cards your dealt.coffee1.gif

    It is that bad. Every time I take to the roads, I feel more and more like it's only a matter of time before I'm involved in an accident. The more you drive, the higher the likelihood. You could be pottering along minding your own business and BLAM!, an oncoming genius decides now is a good time to overtake. I've seen it happen and it's only because I've noticed and swerved out of the way in time that I've lived to tell the tale. There's something particularly concerning about the strange mix of behaviours we see on the roads, the supreme (misplaced) overconfidence, aggression, disregard for consequence of one's actions, lack of forward planning, lack of spatial awareness, lack of basic road skills and let's not forget general dopeyness all the while in charge of powerful 3-litre turbodiesel vehicles. Let alone the strong possibility of alcohol and/or crystal meth added into the mix for good measure. I still can't get get my head around what kind of thought process makes it OK to just join a fast moving stream of cars from a smaller soi without even looking for flip's sake! (seen it done time and time again). I'm speaking from experience about driving on fast single and dual carriageway roads up here in the North East; perhaps it's better in BKK where speeds are limited because of constant logjams and drivers tend to be a bit more savvy from what I've seen.

    Just look at the RTA ranking stats by country - they don't lie.

  12. You are presuming, or at least insinuating quite a bit. I had my signal on, and I slowed down. I had the right of way, period. And yes, with millions of miles driven I have had some oops moments (I would like to know who hasn't). I have only caused one accident, and that is because I did not notice the rain turning to ice (27 cars had accidents in a three mile stretch, but still, I was at fault and caused $300 of damage to the car next to me).

    I did not get upset at his initial action. Stuff happens. I merely went on my way. I posted because the guy found a place to turn around, then drove over a kilometer to chase me down and stop me. So please, pray tell, how is that speaking of entitlement and arrogance? How is that me somehow being imperialistically upset with a lack of respect? Because I am in Thailand, I should accept blatant aggression that could have turned ugly had I not scooted around him and gone into my mooban? Your logic escapes me.

    I hear you Bonobo, but "right of way" doesn't appear to be a readily understood concept over here from what I've observed. If anything, it's "might of way" and your aggressive driver was in a SUV so maybe figured he took precedence (not sure what you were driving?), plus there's often the status baggage that seems to go with driving an expensive Fortuner or whatever it happens to be.
    Just try going round one of the few roundabouts here to witness the complete confusion about who has priority - everyone just creeps forward really cautiously.
  13. Living on 5,500 Baht a month is never advertised as being " easy " but it is for me as i am highly trained to live like this.You have to be the type of person who can live a nice lifestyle and be happy on little money! Remember that i do Not drink,i don't smoke and i don't go to bars! and the most important thing is " I am single " I am not materialistic in anyway at all! I am outdoors every day enjoying the sun.There are always extra costs involved.The other thing is that i walk everywhere! I love it! and i love walking in the sun! Motor bikes and baht buses are for " lazy people " i am 51 in a few days and like to keep fit by " swimming and walking " It's just normal for me to walk at least a journey of 5 km ( probably most of you would catch a baht bus or use a motorbike ) Have you ever thought how much money you waste by going to a 7 eleven? ( i don't need to go to a 7 eleven ) I eat fresh food everyday ( mainly cooked by myself ).I own 4 t shirts and 2 shirts and a couple of pairs of shorts.I haven't bought any clothes for years! I am not here to impress anybody ( also it should be noted that this is Thailand and not Montecarlo ...) My visa is all correct ( i do not do " visa runs " they are only for tourists! ) For long distances then i take the train ( cheap and a fabulous way to travel! ) Pattaya to Bangkok only 31 baht ( 4 hours - oh and i am not in a rush to go anywhere....) Back to eating and my best " investment " was buying a small " rice cooker " for 200 baht ! i use it every day and buy my own " good quality rice " ( much nicer than the cooked rice in the markets )

    I also have lots of hobbies such as " photography,walking,swimming and sunbathing " so i spend most of my time outside.Evenings indoors ( i don't watch much TV ! last night i watched my first movie this year!!! ) I like peace and quiet and i am laid back but i am " ridiculously eccentric " - The Thai kids in the soi find me fascinating ( although the adults are not quite so enthusiastic .......)

    I have been living over seas for almost 25 years ( a 25 year holiday is not bad hey viewers..? ) but if it all goes " Pete Tong " ( wrong ) for me in Thailand ( financial reasons ) i guess i would have to return to the UK.If i did it would be a great shame because i genuinely enjoy a great lifestyle and a happy one on 5,500 baht a month !

    God Bless you all viewers!

    Farang Jaidee wub.png

  14. I tried drinking the water here pattaya by using a steripen after killing the viruses.

    The water tastes awful, tastes like sea water. yuck.

    Any options for getting cheap water or am I stuck with the 13 baht 1 liter bottles.

    You can get 20-litre containers of RO water delivered for 10-12 baht each so that's around 50 satang per litre. I drink it all the time - it tastes fine and no ill effects I've noticed. First time you buy one, you'll need to pay a deposit of around 100B for the big plastic container (which I presume is refundable). Then when it's empty, you just exchange the empty one for a full one (plus the 10-12 baht).

    You can also get metal dispensers that the water containers sit in (around 200-300B) which pivot so you can pour the water out easily without hefting a big heavy container all the time (available in homeware stores).

    You'll see the delivery pickups around and about as they are regularly delivering to other places in the area.

  15. Thanks for the interesting info Inquisitor.

    I'm considering getting 3G at some stage - I may go with CAT 'unlimited' MyClick at 590B a month. In the event I go over the 4GB monthly 3G CAT limit, I'd like to be able be able to top up on a PrePay plan with another provider (e.g. True).

    Are the 3G modems typically locked to a particular provider? Or could I buy say a CAT modem and swap in a True SIM if I wanted to do a pay as you go top up? (or by the same token, buy a True modem and use it for CAT 3G access).

  16. I read this regarding 30-day extensions for 60 day Thai tourist visas:

    "A tourist visa can be used to stay in Thailand for up to 30 days or up to 60 days and can be extended by 30 days at the nearest Immigration office. Normally there is a fee of 1,900 Baht (as per 2008-01-17) but until March 31st 2011 they are free."

    Source: http://www.thaivisa.com/272.0.html

    Is this referring to the 30-day extension being free, or the original 30 or 60-day tourist visa being free? (I know the 30/60-day visa is currently free due to the fee waiver in place until March 2011).

    I have tried googling to find out, but can't be sure - a few snippets I've read here and there would indicate that the 30-day extension is currently being charged at 1,900 Baht.

  17. Does anyone know if Toyota is planning to release a new 4x4 auto Vigo anytime soon? It's been the same shape for years with very few changes that I know of.

    I was at my garage the other day and the dealer said that a model change was coming in June based on the Tundra. He didn't sound very sure of himself though. Does anyone have any news of this or anything else? I want to change mine soon but would be annoyed if a new model came out within months of me changing.

    Any information received with thanks..

    Sledge

    Not sure if it's the 4x4s but one thing I 've heard is that there is a slight tweak coming up for Vigos - basically, the models that are currently 2-door but with seats in the back will have a small so-called "suicide door" option like some of the Nissan Navarra models do - i.e. smaller than a full-sized door, hinged at the back and opening the other way. So - 2 normal doors for the front seats and 2 smaller doors for the back seats.

×
×
  • Create New...
""