Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Northern haze ‘must be on national agenda’

By Chularat Saengpassa 
The Nation

 

88b22d5f99ad2c821ff4635788a48be1.jpeg

A bird’seye view from Phra That Khao Noi Temple in Nan’s Muang district reveals smog shrouding the northern province.

 

CALLS FOR the government to make tackling the problem of serious air pollution part of the national agenda are getting louder.

 

The North has been struggling with severe air pollution for several months now, as outdoor fires are increasing the amount of airborne dust particles. 

 

71782fe937b53a685329e0c9eba1eef7.jpeg

 

Prolonged exposure to fine dust particles such as PM2.5 – particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter – is linked to several health problems including strokes and heart failures. As of press time yesterday, the amount of PM2.5 in the North exceeded the safe limit of 50 micrograms (mcg) per cubic metre of air. 

 

“Smog is a threat to people’s health,” said Sonthi Kotchawat, an independent environmental health expert.

 

He added that the region has been struggling with this dust problem for a long time now, but relevant parties have simply waited for nature – such as wind and rain – to blow away the dangerous dust particles. 

 

“We can’t let northerners struggle with smog every year because their health is in grave danger,” Sonthi said, demanding that the authorities issue clear action plans to address the problem. He also emphasised that the government actively participate in dealing with the problem instead of leaving the job to local authorities.

 

For instance, he said, Chiang Rai – which had the worst air pollution in the nation yesterday – suffered mainly from fires in neighbouring countries. 

 

“Don’t rely on provincial authorities to address this problem. The government needs to take action because the smog has worsened over time,” Sonthi said. 

 

Records show that there were 6,080 hotspots in Myanmar and 3,030 in Laos on Wednesday. Both countries border Thailand in the North. 

 

Although the Asean Transboundary Haze-Fee Roadmap is in place, fires from Thailand’s neighbours have continued polluting the air. 

 

Meanwhile, Chiang Mai has been topping the global list of the world’s most polluted city for a few hours every day since Tuesday. As of 1.49pm yesterday, it was the most polluted city. It’s Air Quality Index stood at 293, a far cry from the safe limit of 100. 

 

The list of the world’s most polluted cities is compiled by AirVisual.com, which monitors air quality across the world. 

 

The Pollution Control Department wrote to Myanmar on Monday asking for help with the smog, but there has been no satisfactory result so far. 

 

In Chiang Rai’s Mae Sai district, which is next to Myanmar, the PM2.5 level hovered around 208mcg per cubic metre of air as of noon yesterday and its AQI stood at a shocking 318 – a threat even to healthy people. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30365843

 

thenation_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation 2019-03-15
  • Heart-broken 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, webfact said:

For instance, he said, Chiang Rai – which had the worst air pollution in the nation yesterday – suffered mainly from fires in neighbouring countries.

those of us that live in chiang rai understand full well that china,laos,maynmar are killing us and there is nothing that thailand can do; prevailing breezes in most mornings comes from our northeast; the 3 countries mentioned

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, YetAnother said:

those of us that live in chiang rai understand full well that china,laos,maynmar are killing us and there is nothing that thailand can do; prevailing breezes in most mornings comes from our northeast; the 3 countries mentioned

I live in the northern central. (Prachinburi) I would hate it if I lived in a worse area than my own. 

Because every day there is a film of ash on everything.

Rural farmers have been doing this form of land preparation for this years crops ever since they became an agrarian culture.

 There is a simple solution, but the junta would have to give funds to farmers. Not going to happen. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, YetAnother said:

those of us that live in chiang rai understand full well that china,laos,maynmar are killing us and there is nothing that thailand can do; prevailing breezes in most mornings comes from our northeast; the 3 countries mentioned

Almost all locals in Chiang Rai burn what ever they get their hands on. Chiang Rai does seem to respect the burning ban, but the other 10 months of the year its burning business as usual. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Prissana Pescud said:

 

Farmers, the core instrument of government wealth have been burning fields for thousands of years.

And no one has yet provided Asia with an alternative. 

How do you clear fields of stubble to plant the next year if you cannot afford to buy a tractor or pay the fuel.

The burned stubble is the fertilizer. Not too many farmers can afford alternatives.

 

This is not quite accurate.  Farmers used to use buffalo and cows to plough the fields.. mixing the stubble back into the earth. No tractors back then!!!   Burning was to clear overgrown land and scrubland to convert to farmland.  Most of the burning is coming from forest fires here too.. which are so damaging to the ecosystems and native animals.. all for making money from black mushrooms.

 

The rotting stubble and buffalo dung in the fields acts as the fertilizer.  Burning the fields they loose a lot of nutrients as the ash is blown away in the wind.

 

Times have changed and these farmers, in general, are now LAZY to take proper care of their fields.  Burning is much easier and quicker then taking the time to hook up a buffalo or 2 and walk up and down ploughing.  Also the traditional, mixed, farms have mostly gone. 

 

The solution is easy.  Either they hire a tractor, hire a company to plough it (same as they all do with the rice harvesting machines). 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, jak2002003 said:

Times have changed and these farmers, in general, are now LAZY to take proper care of their fields.

Agreed, problem is amplified by LAZY Police & government officials who are doing nothing to resolve the problem besides reporting it as little as possible!

 

The problem is far more widespread than they would have us believe, problem for them is people are becoming more aware and equipment to monitor readily available.

Outside of Udon the PM 2.5 reading have been over 150 for days now & its not even considered a problem area!

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, CGW said:

Agreed, problem is amplified by LAZY Police & government officials who are doing nothing to resolve the problem besides reporting it as little as possible!

 

The problem is far more widespread than they would have us believe, problem for them is people are becoming more aware and equipment to monitor readily available.

Outside of Udon the PM 2.5 reading have been over 150 for days now & its not even considered a problem area!

Good post with good points.

 

I might add, that the main problem seems to be about not enforcing the laws.  I don't thinkthis is about being lazy though... its more about not wanting to upset anybody. 

 

They don't want any confrontation or to loose votes, or upset any high up families, or make themselves not be liked / popular... and the all time favourite... no loss of face!!

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jak2002003 said:

This is not quite accurate.  Farmers used to use buffalo and cows to plough the fields.. mixing the stubble back into the earth. No tractors back then!!!   Burning was to clear overgrown land and scrubland to convert to farmland.  Most of the burning is coming from forest fires here too.. which are so damaging to the ecosystems and native animals.. all for making money from black mushrooms.

 

The rotting stubble and buffalo dung in the fields acts as the fertilizer.  Burning the fields they loose a lot of nutrients as the ash is blown away in the wind.

 

Times have changed and these farmers, in general, are now LAZY to take proper care of their fields.  Burning is much easier and quicker then taking the time to hook up a buffalo or 2 and walk up and down ploughing.  Also the traditional, mixed, farms have mostly gone. 

 

The solution is easy.  Either they hire a tractor, hire a company to plough it (same as they all do with the rice harvesting machines). 

 

 

You have it wrong. You can only plough a field with buffalo when the ground is saturated with water.

And that means waiting for the rain season. And poor farmers cannot wait. They prepare the fields by burning.

And how many farmers do you see that own cattle or buffalo. You are out of date by decades. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Today in CM the smoke is even worse, PM2.5 is over 500 at many monitoring stations. 

Hazardous is the highest in the scale starting at 300, they need a new name for our reading...any suggestions?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

With all these images and 2.5 personal measuring devices to paraphase :

"People are using them like a drunk uses a lamppost? More for support than illumination"

 

Anyone who has lived or been in Thailand for more than a few months knows that it gets smokey in Chiang Mai at certain times of the year. So if one does not like smoke why are all the whingers living there.

It is like buying a house near an airport and then complaining about the noise!

  • Heart-broken 1
Posted
5 hours ago, canopy said:

Burning is a new practice that came with chemical farming. In the old days the buffalo would plow the stalks back into the soil for enrichment. EVERYTHING was organic! In today's modern chemical system the stalks are just a waste product and burned. Also in paddy farming back before our generation crabs and snake head fish were released for pest control and at harvest provided a good food source. Now pest control is done by poisons.

 

It's as if you are implying farmers are forced to burn or would be worse off if they didn't do it. This is not true. Burning is bad for farming. It depletes the soil and creates erosion of top soil. But nobody cares about that. They just add more chemical fertilizers which makes them more poor. Farmers burn because they enjoy it. Some people think there must be some deeper justification, but there isn't. Just like there is no reason to make motorcycles loud, but everyone just does it anyway. It's just a thing everyone gets enjoyment from. Who cares if it is illegal and health issue. Nobody cares.

 

You cannot plough the soil unless it is water saturated. And who owns buffalo these days.

And what poor rice paddy farmer can afford a tractor or the fuel. 

You prepare the soil by burning. This is a practice that has been used for millenia.

It is called agrarian agriculture. Because the land was only used to feed the populace, it caused minimal pollution.

But now, in global economics, a farmer has to produce more to exist

Posted

In the "old days" there wasn't the means to do extensive second (dry season) cropping. Farmers trapped in debt have hybrid seeds, fertiliser etc supplied. A bit of irrigation water and hey presto, second crop in order to keep themselves going. More money and earnings for the big guys.

"Small" problem in that the waste needs to be burned at the height of the dry season.

  • Like 2
Posted

Francesca Dominici, professor of biostatistics at Harvard’s school of public health, and a senior author on the paper, said in a statement. Though the study focuses on the US, its basic conclusion applies broadly: the “safe” levels laid out by national health agencies everywhere are inherently far from safe. “Any level of air pollution, no matter how low, is harmful to human health,” Dominici said.

9 hours ago, webfact said:

As of press time yesterday, the amount of PM2.5 in the North exceeded the safe limit of 50 micrograms (mcg) per cubic meter of air.  Here they are stating that the safe limit is 50 micrograms.

9 hours ago, webfact said:

Meanwhile, Chiang Mai has been topping the global list of the world’s most polluted city for a few hours every day since Tuesday. As of 1.49pm yesterday, it was the most polluted city. It’s Air Quality Index stood at 293, a far cry from the safe limit of 100.  Here they are stating the safe limit is 100.

 

Care to guess, which one Thailand is using?

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, VocalNeal said:

With all these images and 2.5 personal measuring devices to paraphase :

"People are using them like a drunk uses a lamppost? More for support than illumination"

 

Anyone who has lived or been in Thailand for more than a few months knows that it gets smokey in Chiang Mai at certain times of the year. So if one does not like smoke why are all the whingers living there.

It is like buying a house near an airport and then complaining about the noise!

"smokey" eh?Another deluded real estate agent in Chiang Mai trying to flog condos.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...