Jump to content

Ombudsman to rule on the matter of PM’s incomplete oath next Tuesday


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Ombudsman to rule on the matter of PM’s incomplete oath next Tuesday

 

 

PM5.jpg

 

The Ombudsman is expected to rule next Tuesday on whether Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha breached the Constitution by failing to recite the oath in full during the swearing-in ceremony in front of His Majesty the King in July, said Mr. Raksakecha Chaechai, secretary-general of the Ombudsman’s Office, on Saturday.

 

He said that officials from the Ombudsman’s Office were working on the Prime Minister’s written explanation of the matter, in response to the complaint lodged by Mr. Srisuwan Janya, secretary-general of the Thai Constitution Protection Association, accusing the Prime Minister of violating Section 161 of the Constitution.

 

Mr. Raksakecha also said that his office had received two similar complaints, from Mr. Aiya Petthong, secretary-general of the Buddhism for Peace Protection Organization, and from Mr. Panupong Churak, a student attending Ramkhamhaeng University.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/ombudsman-to-rule-on-the-matter-of-pms-incomplete-oath-next-tuesday/

 

thaipbs.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2019-08-25
Link to comment
Share on other sites


3 hours ago, rooster59 said:

The Ombudsman is expected to rule

The Ombudsman has no judicial authority.

Any "ruling" is only an administrative opinion and not legally binding.

According to the Constitution, the Ombudsman can refer a case to the court for prosecution, similar to the authority of the EC and the NACC. Normally, prosecution is referred to the Office of the Attorney General, a Cabinet position.

The plaintiff Srisuwan can I think directly petition the Constitutional Court.

The only real advantage for Srisuwan going to the Ombudsman might be simply to play the issue out in the public eye as a political maneuver to embarrass Prayut and reveal his feigned loyalty to a democratic state. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Orton Rd said:

Why can't he just have another go, like a driving test and if he still cannot manage to get it right just pay to pass anyway?

he blatantly refused to do so

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Orton Rd said:

Why can't he just have another go, like a driving test and if he still cannot manage to get it right just pay to pass anyway?

Because the one who ordered him to leave out that section of the oath STILL does not want it to be said.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, greeneking said:

Hardly.  Likely 'majeste' has instructed and approved.

Sure, my point is the current 'gov't' would IMHO throw anything they could at Khun Thanathorn to keep him suspended even jailed and I wouldn't put it past them to try LM. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, grumbleweed said:

I can't for the life of me imagine what the outcome of this little charade will be

It will just be another of the world mysteries as to how the decision was derived by the Ombudsman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""