Jump to content

Fauci says U.S. political divisions contributed to 500,000 dead from COVID-19


webfact

Recommended Posts

Fauci says U.S. political divisions contributed to 500,000 dead from COVID-19

By Julie Steenhuysen

 

2021-02-22T231216Z_1_LYNXMPEH1L1HY_RTROPTP_4_HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-FAUCI.JPG

FILE PHOTO: NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci addresses the daily press briefing at the White House in Washington, U.S. January 21, 2021. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo

 

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, said political divisiveness contributed significantly to the "stunning" U.S. COVID-19 death toll, which on Monday surpassed 500,000 lives lost.

 

The country had recorded more than 28 million COVID-19 cases and 500,054 fatalities as of Monday afternoon, according to a Reuters tally of public health data.

 

In an interview with Reuters, Fauci on Monday said the pandemic arrived in the United States as the country was riven by political divisions in which wearing a mask became a political statement rather than a public health measure.

 

"Even under the best of circumstances, this would have been a very serious problem," Fauci said, noting that despite strong adherence to public health measures, countries such as Germany and the UK struggled with the virus.

 

"However, that does not explain how a rich and sophisticated country can have the most percentage of deaths and be the hardest-hit country in the world," said Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a top adviser to President Joe Biden. "That I believe should not have happened."

 

While the United States has just about 4% of the global population, it has recorded nearly 20% of all COVID-19 deaths.

 

"This is the worst thing that's happened to this country with regard to the health of the nation in over 100 years," Fauci said, adding that decades from now, people will be talking about "that horrible year of 2020, and maybe 2021."

 

For most of 2020, Fauci served on then President Donald Trump's White House Coronavirus Task Force, a job that often put him at odds with the president, who sought to downplay the severity of pandemic despite contracting COVID-19 himself, and refused to issue a national mask mandate.

 

Trump at times even attacked Fauci's credibility, undermining his public health messaging.

 

The nation's failure cannot all be laid at the feet of Donald Trump, Fauci said. "But the lack of involvement at the very top of the leadership in trying to do everything that was science-based was clearly detrimental to the effort."

 

His personal low point came when several states and cities disregarded the Task Force's phased recommendations for how to safely reopen the country after spring lockdowns.

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, said political divisiveness contributed significantly to the "stunning" U.S. COVID-19 death toll, which on Monday surpassed 500,000 lives lost.

 

He called that disregard by several governors and mayors "incomprehensible to me (when) you could see right in front of your eyes what was happening."

 

"When the American spirit is so divided, that really, really made me sad," he said.

 

Fauci said the emergence of more contagious variants of the coronavirus, especially ones from South Africa and Brazil that have been shown to reduce the immunity from natural infections and vaccines, have made it challenging to predict when the nation will be able to put the pandemic behind it.

 

Fauci and Biden have said the United States should return to something approaching pre-pandemic normal life around Christmas. That could change, he cautioned.

 

The variants also change the equation when it comes to herd immunity, in which a population becomes protected from infection because of high levels of immunity from vaccines or infections.

 

Asked whether that is still achievable, Fauci said, "I think we can get herd immunity at least against getting sick."

 

(Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen and Michael Erman in Maplewood, New Jersey; Editing by Bill Berkrot)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-02-23
 
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I want to take back everything I said about the politicization of the mask issue. But I don't think I can:

North Dakota House passes bill forbidding mandatory mask wearing

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Jeff Hoverson (R), called mask mandates “diabolical silliness,” characterizing them as a conspiracy run by “unelected, wealthy bureaucrats who are robbing our freedoms and perpetuating lies,” the Herald reported.

The number of COVID-19 cases declined after Burgum's mask mandate. The Herald also notes that health experts have attributed the drop to a combination of factors, including restrictions on businesses and increased social distancing.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/539993-north-dakota-house-passes-bill-forbidding-mandatory-mask-wearing

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, candide said:

I remember them going full steam with a barrage of posts! "It's like a flu"; "It's just Dems and MSM creating panic", "more people die from flu"; "experts! Which experts?", "death numbers are inflated", etc

Of course, a few months later, the same posters claimed that it was not only Trump who underestimated the accuteness of the pandemic, but also the Dems and MSM.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

We saw it clearly demonstrated on this forum, Trump supporters and right wingers in full denial over the virus and the means to fight it.

I can only think of one rightwing member who accepted and argued the case for the danger the virus posed and in favor of public health measures, including the wearing of masks.

The rest were frequently posting misinformation, playing down the virus and arguing against masks, lockdowns and isolations.

 

This is an example of why I say the "T___p thing" stopped being politics after he was inaugurated and became a personality cult (arguably it was even before the election).  The proof of it is he could say ANYTHING (and has!) and his followers will accept it, agree with it, and defend it.  And they still do.  If he was more adept at Christian scripture the cult would be a full-on religion by now.   But with preachers claiming from the pulpit that the election was stolen and that DT was anointed by god, this mess is still getting uglier.

 

https://www.npr.org/2021/02/21/969539514/disinformation-fuels-a-white-evangelical-movement-it-led-1-virginia-pastor-to-qu

 

https://www.npr.org/sections/insurrection-at-the-capitol/2021/01/13/955801878/how-did-we-get-here-a-call-for-an-evangelical-reckoning-on-trump

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

I doubt he has legal exposure for policies (more like LACK of policies) that he led while president. 

 

I think Jingthing is correctly referring to "sovereign immunity."  I am not going to open that can of worms by trying to explain it.  But, if it does interest you, that's how to get more info about it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""