Jump to content

Who will never vaccinate except if forced to for visa reasons ? and do you think that they will force us ?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I hope Darwin takes care of the problem of anti vaxers.   https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-who-made-fun-vaccination-efforts-social-media-dies-covid-n1274922   And sometimes

hi, I cannot find any information but until now it seems that no country has forced vaccination for expats to renew visa ?   do you think that it will happen here ?   it would be s

More likely Darwin will take care of people allowing experimental substances into their bodies. If they aren't dangerous, why are all the manufacturers indemnified against any and all problems ar

Posted Images

8 minutes ago, placeholder said:

But here's your original claim: 

"Covid Vaccines did not meet the true vaccine definition so wording of definition was changed. You pick your own source."

 

As that Merriam Webster article I linked to  shows, the definition of vaccine has been repeatedly changed because as science advanced, earlier definitions became outmoded. Luddite much?

Yes in his original claim e says something else and insinuates that this is some kind of evil conspiracy. Now all of a sudden he changes his tune.   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, robblok said:

Yes words were changed the definition was made more clear. If you really read what you posted you too would understand that this is a lot about nothing and like placeholder says the definition has changed a lot over the years. That is what happens when science evolves. 

I was attacked at the onset of my post, that it wasn't true. Only when you see it is true you and others try a different approach. Oh and now it's science evolves, nice one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure if Thailand will force everyone to get the vaccine, but not having one will become increasingly more difficult and inconvenient. International travel will become impossible without one, and you may not be allowed back into Thailand ever again, if you left.

 

Just suck it up and do it. I am not a vax person, but I made an exception for this. Not worried about Gates following me around. LOL. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I was attacked at the onset of my post, that it wasn't true. Only when you see it is true you and others try a different approach. Oh and now it's science evolves, nice one.

no you claimed something else that the definition was changed so covid vaccines would fit the definition. However in that same article its explained that this is not the case. You don't even read your own article. It has absolutely nothing to do with some large conspiracy like you insinuated. All what is true is that the definition of vaccines has been updated. Not your other claim. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I was attacked at the onset of my post, that it wasn't true. Only when you see it is true you and others try a different approach. Oh and now it's science evolves, nice one.

And then your contention that "Covid Vaccines do not meet the true definition of vaccines" was criticized by me. And as I have pointed out, it wasn't a true definition of the vaccine but an outmoded one. And, in fact this has been the history of the meaning of vaccine. It started out meaning the pus from a cowpox infections. IAs the history of the word shows, it's scientists who get to decide what the relevant facts are to determine what is and isn't a vaccine. Not dictionaries.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

I am not sure if Thailand will force everyone to get the vaccine

Sorry to contradict you, but for expats, I would say that it is as certain as anything can be, that a double vaccine and maybe even boosters,  will at some time be required for visas and renewal of  extensions of stay. If I were the Thai authorities, that is what I would certainly insist upon. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

Any link I provide you'll discredit the source, Covid Vaccines did not meet the true vaccine definition so wording of definition was changed. You pick your own source.

So you make two claims, but at last give us the link:

 

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

So this has become you're witt us or agan us, opinions aren't allowed, names created for those who dare question the authorities.

 

https://www.mahoningmatters.com/local-news/why-did-cdc-change-its-definition-for-vaccine-agency-explains-move-as-skeptics-lurk-4319035

Why would I or anyone else wish to discredit this link?

 

The article clearly outlines the reason for the change in definition, which was not as you asserted because the ‘vaccines didn’t meet the true definition’.

 

The article provides an insight into the ‘with us or gainer us’ behind the ‘conspiracy’ insomuch it’s being promoted by Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky - no surprises that he’s a Republican.

 

What he is not is any kind of medical professional and has no education or experience on the field of virology or vaccines.

 

Not a problem, the article gives an explanation for the definition from the CDC, which is replete with medical professionals and virologists.

 

So:

 

1. Your assertion that your link would be discredited is unfounded. 

2. Your assertion for why the definition was changed is unfounded.

 

Thanks for posting the informative link.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bottom line ignoring Visas per se is that no one is getting past immigration without double vaccination and certificate to prove

 

You either conform or you aint coming into or remaining in Thailand....period

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, placeholder said:

And then your contention that "Covid Vaccines do not meet the true definition of vaccines" was criticized by me. And as I have pointed out, it wasn't a true definition of the vaccine but an outmoded one. And, in fact this has been the history of the meaning of vaccine. It started out meaning the pus from a cowpox infections. IAs the history of the word shows, it's scientists who get to decide what the relevant facts are to determine what is and isn't a vaccine. Not dictionaries.

Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.”

 

The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

 

It's just a coincidence this change happened now. I think not.

 

 

 

Up until covid hit us we looked upon a vaccine as a stopper more or less. We felt sort of safe having kids vaccinated. When my daughter was born here in Thailand they gave her  many vaccinations or shots or whatever really smart people call them so they can feel smart. Now you're trying to say it's just a coincidence that the definition of vaccine changed.  

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, placeholder said:

But here's your original claim: 

"Covid Vaccines did not meet the true vaccine definition so wording of definition was changed. You pick your own source."

 

As that Merriam Webster article I linked to  shows, the definition of vaccine has been repeatedly changed because as science advanced, earlier definitions became outmoded. Luddite much?

Would I be out of line in thinking this is a side issue for a person who just wants to survive the pandemic?

Edited by cdemundo
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.”

 

The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

 

It's just a coincidence this change happened now. I think not.

 

 

 

Up until covid hit us we looked upon a vaccine as a stopper more or less. We felt sort of safe having kids vaccinated. When my daughter was born here in Thailand they gave her  many vaccinations or shots or whatever really smart people call them so they can feel smart. Now you're trying to say it's just a coincidence that the definition of vaccine changed.  

Its truly amazing that you keep on digging. No wonder normal people think lowly of antivaxxers.

 

Vaccines before were also not 100%, all they did is update things a bit nothing changed but some wording. Yes the covid vaccines are probably less effective then other vaccines. But nobody is hiding that, its been in the news all the time. Anyone who missed that must have been living under a rock.

 

Really if this is the best you can do to make a big problem out of something so small and think its a conspiracy. You must be bored.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I was attacked at the onset of my post, that it wasn't true. Only when you see it is true you and others try a different approach. Oh and now it's science evolves, nice one.

You asserted the definition was changed because the new vaccine(s) could not meet the old definition.

 

Your assertion was a falsehood, which is why it is being criticized.

 

You are not being attacked.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ozimoron said:

The ones with peer assessed publications in reputable journals.

You didn't give an names. Quite a few articles are appearing in reputable journals that are super dodgy. And not supported by the majority of scientists.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

So this has become you're witt us or agan us, opinions aren't allowed, names created for those who dare question the authorities.

 

https://www.mahoningmatters.com/local-news/why-did-cdc-change-its-definition-for-vaccine-agency-explains-move-as-skeptics-lurk-4319035

You fall for it every time. Not credible at all. Terrible. Social media is the WORST place to get your news from.

 

From that article:

 

Social media is calling bluff on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for modifying its definition of the words “vaccine” and “vaccination” on its website.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

So you think had Covid - 19 never appeared on the scene, the definition of vaccine would still have been altered. You think that well it was just time to modify the definition, it's all just a coincidence. 

 

 

Stop with your conspiracy theories. Jeez. Give it a rest. Please.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

So you think had Covid - 19 never appeared on the scene, the definition of vaccine would still have been altered. You think that well it was just time to modify the definition, it's all just a coincidence. 

 

 

Of course its no coincidence right now vaccines are in the spotlight. What better time to update some descriptions a bit to make them clearer. So no coincidence but no conspiracy either. Im not sure what you are thinking about but all the scientist call these vaccines vaccines. I havent heard anyone saying they are not vaccines. Maybe you listen to much to crazy people.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I tell you what I think.

 

Somebody fed you the falsehood surrounding the change in definition of a vaccine, rather than spending a little time checking* if that were true, it suited your own agenda so you posted the falsehood here.

 

* Had you read and inwardly digested the article you linked to you would have realized you were latched onto this falsehood.

 

Now, unable to defend the falsehood with facts, you resort to implying some kind of conspiracy.

 

As I said earlier:

 

There is no basis for your claim regarding why the definition was modified, you even provided a link to an article that clearly debunks the claim (which I thanked you for).

 

Rather than dreaming up ever more slippery ‘defenses’ I suggest you examine where you get these demonstrable falsehoods from and why it is you don’t check them before reposting them here.

The definition just like I stated and which yous guys vigorously claimed as false was indeed changed. But you go ahead and believe as you please. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe this, there are still people debating if they should get vaccinated or not. 24 pages and running. I simply can't believe this.

Go and get your shots (men, they are given free of charge!) and continue social distancing wearing one, but better two facemasks whenever you are outside of your home and wash your hands all the time, all the time. Get your kids 12+ years old vaccinated as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Dario said:

I can't believe this, there are still people debating if they should get vaccinated or not. 24 pages and running. I simply can't believe this.

Go and get your shots (men, they are given free of charge!) and continue social distancing wearing one, but better two facemasks whenever you are outside of your home and wash your hands all the time, all the time. Get your kids 12+ years old vaccinated as well.

Right away dad.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...