Trump's crackdown on LA protests is pure hypocrisy

[JAG]

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

When you leftists were throwing nonsensical accusations at Trump when it was clear he would wipe the floor with your demented woke King? Problem was he was so clean you had to end the entire justice system to pull off a north Korean-esque style legal manouver that was as successful as the final Ocean Gate voyage.

Next....

 

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

When you leftists were throwing nonsensical accusations at Trump when it was clear he would wipe the floor with your demented woke King? Problem was he was so clean you had to end the entire justice system to pull off a north Korean-esque style legal manouver that was as successful as the final Ocean Gate voyage.

Next....

I have taken the liberty of running your post through "Google Translate" but I'm sorry, it still didnt make any sense!

[JAG]

55 minutes ago, JimGant said:

 

 

Plenty of info on this subject on Google. My beef is not with Holland (Netherlands) for being smart enough to stay neutral -- but with stupid Americans, like President Wilson, that somehow believed America needed to get involved in European affairs -- with a subsequent -- and unnecessary -- high price in lives. And a high price, in not allowing Germany to arrive at an amicable surrender, but instead be shamed into a harsh treaty that lead to WWII. 

 

Anyway, weirdo Trump's divorce from Europe is pretty much what most of America, whose ancestors left Europe to get away from their problems, endorse. 

Given the "nationalist antics" weirdo Trump is stoking in the USA, many of those who your ancestors left behind view the prospect of such a divorce rather amicably!

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, JAG said:

 

I have taken the liberty of running your post through "Google Translate" but I'm sorry, it still didnt make any sense!

Do you think the protestors that broke windows, lit fires, damaged cars or committed violence of any kind should be prosecuted?

[kevozman1]

2 minutes ago, JAG said:

Given the "nationalist antics" weirdo Trump is stoking in the USA, many of those who your ancestors left behind view the prospect of such a divorce rather amicably!

 

Personally I am of a mixed opinion of the concept of nationalism, but however just to remind you and others that if you have a legit problem with nationalism then Thailand is an incompatible destination for you as it's a highly nationalistic society (as you already know but I just like hypocrisy to be pointed out).

[Hummin]

24 minutes ago, connda said:

I've wanted to do that to Main-Stream Reporters.  Give that officer a gold medal and a box of rubber bullets! 

 

Adam Mockler brakes down the incident. Australian authorities is furious about the happening 5 years after Amelia Brace another Australian journalist was beaten up by police
 

 

 

[dutch boy]

1 hour ago, JimGant said:

 

 

Plenty of info on this subject on Google. My beef is not with Holland (Netherlands) for being smart enough to stay neutral -- but with stupid Americans, like President Wilson, that somehow believed America needed to get involved in European affairs -- with a subsequent -- and unnecessary -- high price in lives. And a high price, in not allowing Germany to arrive at an amicable surrender, but instead be shamed into a harsh treaty that lead to WWII. 

 

Anyway, weirdo Trump's divorce from Europe is pretty much what most of America, whose ancestors left Europe to get away from their problems, endorse. 

Smart enough to stay neutral but life was not a picnic in the Netherlands during WW1. My grandparents have shared stories of their suffering during this period, even to the point of starvation. The Dutch tried to stay neutral during WW2 also but that did not work for them. 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, kevozman1 said:

 

Personally I am of a mixed opinion of the concept of nationalism, but however just to remind you and others that if you have a legit problem with nationalism then Thailand is an incompatible destination for you as it's a highly nationalistic society (as you already know but I just like hypocrisy to be pointed out).

 

Do you want nationalism or globalism? That's the choice.

 

Do you want your home country to be more like the nation you grew up in, or more like the countries of the citizens from around the globe that are trying to get into the nation you grew up in? 

 

The left are globalists. They generally want to destroy the family unit, and they want open borders and mass migration. 

 

The left has worked hard to make nationalism a dirty word. The need citizens to denounce their culture, that's why the attack it, and flood the country with illegal aliens to dilute it.  

 

Nationalism is not a dirty word.

[Yellowtail]

5 minutes ago, Hummin said:

 

 

 

 

Was the report ordered repeatably to move back and was refusing? 

[kevozman1]

27 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

Do you want nationalism or globalism? That's the choice.

 

Do you want your home country to be more like the nation you grew up in, or more like the countries of the citizens from around the globe that are trying to get into the nation you grew up in? 

 

The left are globalists. They generally want to destroy the family unit, and they want open borders and mass migration. 

 

The left has worked hard to make nationalism a dirty word. The need citizens to denounce their culture, that's why the attack it, and flood the country with illegal aliens to dilute it.  

 

Nationalism is not a dirty word.

 

Like I said i'm mixed when it comes to nationalism, on a conceptual level, but it's not a deal breaker for me, I can hang out with people who are nationalistic. When it comes to Western leftists, I can't relate to them nor do I want to as they support disorder, weakness and degeneracy. Many of them are the most brainwashed people in this realm that I have encountered.

 

Modern Liberalism is to benefit the elite and the 1% who pretend/act as if they endorse this ideology. The rest of the pea-brain buffoons outside the 1% who are fooled by Modern Liberalism, or those of such low genetic stock that it's their revenge against society, should be looked at with disdain.  

[ericthai]

11 hours ago, FolkGuitar said:

I saw the same... on January 6th. Only then police were killed by the mob seeking to take over the United States.

Live ammo time? So you are suggesting that Americans shoot other Americans? 

Hey, that's not the America I grew up in.

That's North Korea. That's Russia. That's any dictatorship. That's NOT America... at least, it wasn't America.

you saw police being killed at the January 6th riots???

That's weird, maybe it was the woman protester you saw getting shot by police.   

 

How many officers were killed at the capital on the 6th?  = 0 

How many died = 5  one had a Stroke a few days later, it was most likely brought on by being hit with a fire extinguisher.

The other 4 all committed suicide days and months later. The main stream media like to push that they all died that day.   

[ericthai]

8 hours ago, JAG said:

As far as I can see it is the Governer of The State of California who has the right to initiate, direct and control the deployment and use of The National Guard, and retains primary responsibility for law enforcement in the State. Now, whilst I understand that there are certain legal steps which will empower the President to take over those responsibilities, it is far from clear that those legal steps and requirements have been met. The questions of legality, and with them criminality, seem to lie with the Federal side.

I think the "Commander and Chief" can call in the military when a good amount of citizens from another country has taken over areas of the USA by force waving the flag of their home country.....I believe this would be considered an invasion in any other country.  

[Peabody]

14 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Deporting people who came into the country illegally and have no legal right to be in the country. Am I missing something here? 

The ability to think?

Due process.

[mogandave]

1 minute ago, Peabody said:

The ability to think?

Due process.

What due process are illegal aliens entitled to? 

 

What due process are illegal aliens that have had deportation orders issued against them entitled to? 

[FolkGuitar]

13 minutes ago, mogandave said:

What due process are illegal aliens entitled to? 

 

What due process are illegal aliens that have had deportation orders issued against them entitled to? 

Oh, the sheer unmitigated ignorance...  Unbelievable!  And I'll bet you call yourself an American patriot, right?

Due Process Rights in America: Application to All, Including Illegal Aliens

Everyone physically present in the United States—including undocumented immigrants (often referred to as "illegal aliens")—is guaranteed due process under the U.S. Constitution.

Constitutional Basis

• The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person (not just citizens) shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law

• .

• The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that these protections apply to all people on U.S. soil, regardless of their legal status

• .

[SunnyinBangrak]

39 minutes ago, ericthai said:

I think the "Commander and Chief" can call in the military when a good amount of citizens from another country has taken over areas of the USA by force waving the flag of their home country.....I believe this would be considered an invasion in any other country.  

Im thinking Trump might want to call in someone with a stellar record of quashing violent leftist dirtbags. Get Kyle Rittenhouse in charge of restoring law and order in LA. In fact, make him the emergency governer of California before the whole state is lost forever.

[mogandave]

2 minutes ago, FolkGuitar said:

Oh, the sheer unmitigated ignorance...  Unbelievable!  And I'll bet you call yourself an American patriot, right?

Due Process Rights in America: Application to All, Including Illegal Aliens

Everyone physically present in the United States—including undocumented immigrants (often referred to as "illegal aliens")—is guaranteed due process under the U.S. Constitution.

Constitutional Basis

• The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person (not just citizens) shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law

• .

• The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that these protections apply to all people on U.S. soil, regardless of their legal status

• .

So you do not know, I thought not.

 

 I know everyone has due process rights, I never said they did not. And while those rights are the same for everyone in a criminal court, they are not the same not the same in an immigration court. 

 

Secondly, anyone that has had a deportation order issued against them has already had due process in regard to whether or not they can be deported. 

[dinsdale]

1 hour ago, Peabody said:

The ability to think?

Due process.

Due process for MS13/Tren de Aragua members, murderers, child rapists, fentanyl drug runners, human traffickers etc who are in the country illegally? To say these people should be protected and not deported immediately or thrown into US jails if crimes have been committed in the US is lunacy. If they are on a TPS the courts DO NOT have jurisdiction. @mogandave is correct 

"rights are the same for everyone in a criminal court, they are not the same not the same in an immigration court. 

 

Secondly, anyone that has had a deportation order issued against them has already had due process in regard to whether or not they can be deported."