The writer is correct.  The left is a total and utter failure in the USA and the UK. 

 

 

https://open.substack.com/pub/andrewsullivan/p/how-utterly-lost-is-the-left?r=qaup1&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

 

How Utterly Lost Is The Left?

 

From UK's Labour to the response to Charlie Kirk in the US, it's paralyzed.

 

 

The other day I sat, slack-jawed, reading Kamala Harris’ book — which was not easy to do with my eyeballs permanently rolled into the back of my head. (On one issue that killed her campaign, trans policy, she still hasn’t got the slightest clue what she’s talking about.) At one point, I even tried to imagine what America would be like today if this woke lawyer had actually won last year.

 

Then it occurred to me that we already kind of know. We actually have a pretty good test case of exactly that: a center-left lawyer-politician coming to power last year after a massive immigration wave had discredited and ousted the previous incumbent. Enter Keir Starmer, my high school frenemy, and now prime minister.

 

But unlike Harris, Starmer has at least shown signs of understanding his problem: he kicked the far-left Corbynites out of the party, called out anti-semitism, and in his big speech to his party’s annual conference this week, spoke proudly of flying the Union Jack, saying “we placed too much faith in globalization.” In office, he backed Israel’s war against Hamas strongly for a year-and-a-half, followed the science by banning puberty blockers and sex changes for kids, tightened immigration rules a bit, and pursued deregulation of the private sector, especially housing.

The disposition of the left is simply a rampant mental disorder of psychosis.

2 minutes ago, novacova said:

The disposition of the left is simply a rampant mental disorder of psychosis.

This is a fact. 

Topic fails to meet forum rules and requires a sign up to read.

 

General approach and policy.

 

We maintain a strict policy of accepting links or content only from mainstream and recognized media sources to ensure that information posted by members is both verifiable and trustworthy. We strive to remain impartial, prioritizing content that meets these standards and removing content that, in our opinion, does not.

 

Consequently, we do not accept content from social media platforms unless it originates from a credible, professional, and qualified source. This approach is essential for upholding the integrity and credibility of the information shared within our community."

 

Topic is CLOSED