4 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

More empty assertions and personal comments. 

 Kinda done with you tbh

7 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Are you wholly ignorant of the English language? It's an extremely common idiom / collocation. If you went to university please don't admit it. 

I point out that you don't even understand the evidence you introduced and consequently you launch into a rant instead of acknowledging your defective understanding And the proof of how empty your comments are is that you conclude with a prediction about your movement's glorious future.

Did you just buy yourself a new super duper crystal ball?

5 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 Kinda done with you tbh

Actually, it's with yourself you're done. As in done in.

56 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

This moron is part of the blob. What are you talking about ffs?!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_C._McCarthy

In 2019, McCarthy authored Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency, alleging that the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration colluded to rig the 2016 election against Trump, who endorsed the book in September 2019.[36] McCarthy defended Trump amid calls for his impeachment in 2019 over the Trump–Ukraine scandal wherein Trump sought to intimidate the Ukrainian president into starting an investigation of the allegedly corrupt business dealings of Hunter Biden, the son of Trump's political rival, Joe Biden.[37][38] McCarthy expressed a belief that Trump's actions regarding the incident did not reach the level of impeachable conduct.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_C._McCarthy

The first 2 Supreme Court big 'merit' cases will start next month. So far in Trump version 2 it has only issued "shadow docket" emergency rulings.

 

The 2 cases are the firing of Fed Reserve member Cook and the IEEPA tariff case.

2 hours ago, KhaoHom said:

 

As I stated, he will have his day in court.

 

You joined up here and all I see is Leftist pot stirring non stop. You're a one man propaganda machine. Unsurprisingly. 

 

Obviously, a multi account user. No question about it

Wonder if he/she/it has even made a post on Thailand, this being predominantly a Thai forum? All I see is political nonsense. 

3 hours ago, KhaoHom said:

Great job on the copy paste and subsequent analysis 🤡

Of course he cites Comeys arguments. Typical. Support the criminal. Its the same crap he was writing before his reincarnation under his present identity. 

3 hours ago, sungod said:

Wonder if he/she/it has even made a post on Thailand, this being predominantly a Thai forum? All I see is political nonsense. 

Why do you wonder?

6 hours ago, KhaoHom said:

Case Against Comey is Based on Prosecution Lies

 

Presumably, very presumably this is correct - which it is not

 

It will all shake out in the court system as it did for Trump. 

 

Our political institutions are ruined, the lower courts full of activist judges, but appeals and SCOTUS are still the glue holding the republic together.

 

The criminal will have a fair trial then hopefully taken out back of Congress and hanged like the treasonous dog he is

 

Great job on the copy paste and subsequent analysis 🤡

 

The issue becomes one of harassment and the misuse of the  DOJ to target  people. it brings to mind the dark  period of the McCarthy era.  Repeated  actions like this could     be the downfall of the Trump administration. People  grew weary of Trump's follies.  midway through his last administration and it may well happen again.

Sen. Cruz To James Comey: You Were Either Deliberately Corrupt or Woefully Incompetent

https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-to-james-comey-you-were-either-deliberately-corrupt-or-woefully-incompetent

 

How about both Deliberately Corrupt and Woefully Incompetent. There is so much evidence that the FBI and Justice Department were weaponized by the Democrats. Comey needs to serve time for his corruption. 

As has been pointed out before, this case will never go to trial. Comey, Smith and James haven't been indicted because they are criminals, they've been indicted because Trump is a criminal.

End of story.

6 hours ago, KhaoHom said:

Finally, Trump had his days in court and beat all the raps. He was found innocent of the corrupt , political charges levied against him by the highest courts. 

What? Found innocent? It's another lie! 🤣🤣🤣

 

The cases have been dismissed by Cannon on procedural grounds (arguing that Smith had not been legally appointed).

“All I can say to Jake is I’m not aware of Jim Comey ever authorizing some other person to leak information,” McCabe told CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday.....

 

“I never asked Jim Comey to authorize any disclosure to the media because I didn’t have to. At that time in the FBI, there’s only two people who had the authority to make that decision independently. One was Jim Comey, and the other was me,” McCabe told CNN Sunday..

https://nypost.com/2025/09/28/us-news/comeys-ex-no-2-andrew-mccabe-not-aware-of-him-authorizing-leaks/

 

Knowing that, it's not surprising that Trump's crooked DOJ did not interview McCabe! 🤣🤣🤣

 

“And of course, if my interactions with Jim Comey nine years ago, in October 2016, was going to be the basis of this entire prosecution, it’s unbelievable to think that prosecutors wouldn’t at least want to sit down and hear what I had to say about it,” McCabe said, noting he “could potentially be a fact witness or just to understand what my perspective is, and that has never happened.”

 

McCabe says he hasn’t been contacted by FBI in Comey probe

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5525686-comey-mccabe-fbi-probe/

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Of course he cites Comeys arguments. Typical. Support the criminal. Its the same crap he was writing before his reincarnation under his present identity. 

They may be Comey's arguments but facts they're based on are incontrovertible. If you think that's not the case, then provide evidence to the contrary. I won't be holding my breath.

17 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

They may be Comey's arguments but facts they're based on are incontrovertible. If you think that's not the case, then provide evidence to the contrary. I won't be holding my breath.

Has there been a trial or hearing yet?

2 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

The issue becomes one of harassment and the misuse of the  DOJ to target  people. it brings to mind the dark  period of the McCarthy era.  Repeated  actions like this could     be the downfall of the Trump administration. People  grew weary of Trump's follies.  midway through his last administration and it may well happen again.

 

Oh please, 

 

Precisely what happened to Trump except this lot will see convictions.

 

Pot, kettle 

 

Kettle - pot

 

Doth ye protest too much 

A post containing a fictitious claim in relation to Donald Trump's criminal history was removed.

16 hours ago, stevenl said:

Why do you wonder?

You are right, I shouldn't.

Its just a troll/bot. 

1 hour ago, sungod said:

You are right, I shouldn't.

Its just a troll/bot. 

You know better.

But why wonder about the posting history of someone you care nothing about. Rhetorical question.

17 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

They may be Comey's arguments but facts they're based on are incontrovertible. If you think that's not the case, then provide evidence to the contrary. I won't be holding my breath.

Ill let the relevant and material testimony come out at trial. Meanwhile, hes gonna need a new lawyer.

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

You know better.

But why wonder about the posting history of someone you care nothing about. Rhetorical question.

Whats your fixation on this?