Jump to content

Thailand aims to become high income country in the next ten years


webfact

Recommended Posts

To get there, would mean the education system needs to churn out a smarter generation

Then that smarter generation, will do the maths and discover that its a hopeless endeavor when those in power remain bufoons in their logic

Then to get anything done, this smart generation will need to copy how the bufoons get things done and the place ends up corrupt and stupid again

Its a vicous circle that the old generation cling too and pass down to their children....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ah yes stick a uniform on them and they know everything. The only people who will be in the high income in ten years will be the Military generals.

Just out of interest anyone know if they've raised their own wages?

rijit

Oh I don't think they are bothered about wages.

They're peanuts compared to the " income opportunities" opened up by being the people in power!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen a lot of negative comments in this thread, but let's try to make a real evaluation of this statement:

1. "High Income Country" is a term that refers to a country with a nominal GNI (Gross National Income) per capita of US$ 12,735 or above.

This threshhold changes every year, according to the inflattion in a few major economies.

2. You can see the list of countries by GNI per capita here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GNI_%28nominal,_Atlas_method%29_per_capita

3. Thailand currently has a GNI per capita of US$ 5,410, which puts it in the "Upper-middle-income" group

4. In order to reach the threshhold of US$ 12,735, the Thai GNI per capita in US$ needs to grow by 135% (((12,735 / 5,410) - 1) x 100)

5. How long would it take?

If the GNI per capita grows by 3% per year (quite fast, but achievable), it would take Thailand 29 years to reach the "High Income Country" threshhold.

If the GNI per capita grows by 5% per year (very unlikely), it would take Thailand 18 years to reach the "High Income Country" threshhold.

Personally, I think a 3% per year growth rate is much more realistic than 5%. It may be even lower, at 2-2.5%.

If I had to make a bet on this, I would put it at 35-40 years (so around the year 2050/55).

You assume a stable GNI in the West. What makes you so sure that Western GNIs will not decline?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so while Thailand aspires to be a high income country, meanwhile China is seriously looking for new ways to reduce labour costs..............blink.png

http://www.scmp.com/tech/enterprises/article/1786484/building-work-starts-first-all-robot-manufacturing-plant-chinas

Not everything can be done by robots.

Take into account that Thailand has advanced medicine and is very good in caretaking professions.

Even today's massage girl might be tomorrow's physiotherapist, eg.

The caretaking family might be a way of life for future pensioners, etc etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen a lot of negative comments in this thread, but let's try to make a real evaluation of this statement:

1. "High Income Country" is a term that refers to a country with a nominal GNI (Gross National Income) per capita of US$ 12,735 or above.

This threshhold changes every year, according to the inflattion in a few major economies.

2. You can see the list of countries by GNI per capita here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GNI_%28nominal,_Atlas_method%29_per_capita

3. Thailand currently has a GNI per capita of US$ 5,410, which puts it in the "Upper-middle-income" group

4. In order to reach the threshhold of US$ 12,735, the Thai GNI per capita in US$ needs to grow by 135% (((12,735 / 5,410) - 1) x 100)

5. How long would it take?

If the GNI per capita grows by 3% per year (quite fast, but achievable), it would take Thailand 29 years to reach the "High Income Country" threshhold.

If the GNI per capita grows by 5% per year (very unlikely), it would take Thailand 18 years to reach the "High Income Country" threshhold.

Personally, I think a 3% per year growth rate is much more realistic than 5%. It may be even lower, at 2-2.5%.

If I had to make a bet on this, I would put it at 35-40 years (so around the year 2050/55).

That's around the same time that bkk will have partially sunk into the sea.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This explains why a bear i Pattaya cost 180THB in many bars and so on.

Western prices in a third world country.

And then "why do less tourist spend time here?"

Classic asian culture. "We have sold 50% less = lets rise prices 50% to cover that"

The work ethic Thai people is huge. They are legendary hard workers: if there is good management.

And this is the biggest problem in Thailand: Their fanatical nationalism. In their backbone a foreigner can't know better since they are not Thai.

Spend some time and read the TH national anthem. If my I said the same thing in my home country I would be in jail for "racism".

But maybe this is why many /I love Thailand. The buddhist culture.

Everyday I see motorcycles drive 50+KM/h on walking streets. "Mai pen rai".

99% time tourist and other walkers manages to avoid getting hit by the bike. The 1% time when people are hurt: "Its Buddhas will".

Taking responsibility like germanic culture don't exist. No self criticism.

(Its amazing how much progress Thailand have done economically the last 25 years. People earn on average 3 times more money. Compare with west. I haven't got a rise last 15 years since all money is used in Sweden to immigration so they can kill the ethnic population quicker)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Along with high prices to match and the end of the Tourist trade, Tourists who like this part of the world will go to Burma, Cambodia or Vietnam, where prices will be more realistic. As usual no forward thinking or looking at the big picture or the affects of a hike in living standard costs but no rise in associated services or standards. Of course I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at somewhere like Singapore that dragged itself from the dirt to be a thriving leading example of how things can be done, with the type of government they had, in a very small geographical space, and that it took a few decades to get there, yet still considered a success story....

Then look at Thailand which is substantially larger, and it's agricultural base more than service or manufacturing, and a 'different' level of education. I would expect that to achieve this would even with optimism, be a multi-generational endeavour.

I would suggest the pursuit of happiness rather than maximum baht in pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This explains why a bear i Pattaya cost 180THB in many bars and so on.

Western prices in a third world country.

And then "why do less tourist spend time here?"

Classic asian culture. "We have sold 50% less = lets rise prices 50% to cover that"

The work ethic Thai people is huge. They are legendary hard workers: if there is good management.

And this is the biggest problem in Thailand: Their fanatical nationalism. In their backbone a foreigner can't know better since they are not Thai.

Spend some time and read the TH national anthem. If my I said the same thing in my home country I would be in jail for "racism".

But maybe this is why many /I love Thailand. The buddhist culture.

Everyday I see motorcycles drive 50+KM/h on walking streets. "Mai pen rai".

99% time tourist and other walkers manages to avoid getting hit by the bike. The 1% time when people are hurt: "Its Buddhas will".

Taking responsibility like germanic culture don't exist. No self criticism.

(Its amazing how much progress Thailand have done economically the last 25 years. People earn on average 3 times more money. Compare with west. I haven't got a rise last 15 years since all money is used in Sweden to immigration so they can kill the ethnic population quicker)

It's amazing how Farangs accuse Thais for being nationalistic while at the same time they bash Asian refugees and immigrants for coming into their home countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Douglass North writes in his book Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance :

"The inability of societies to develop effective, low-cost enforcement of contracts is the most important source of both historical stagnation and contemporary underdevelopment in the Third World."

Edited by Rama
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This explains why a bear i Pattaya cost 180THB in many bars and so on.

Western prices in a third world country.

And then "why do less tourist spend time here?"

Classic asian culture. "We have sold 50% less = lets rise prices 50% to cover that"

The work ethic Thai people is huge. They are legendary hard workers: if there is good management.

And this is the biggest problem in Thailand: Their fanatical nationalism. In their backbone a foreigner can't know better since they are not Thai.

Spend some time and read the TH national anthem. If my I said the same thing in my home country I would be in jail for "racism".

But maybe this is why many /I love Thailand. The buddhist culture.

Everyday I see motorcycles drive 50+KM/h on walking streets. "Mai pen rai".

99% time tourist and other walkers manages to avoid getting hit by the bike. The 1% time when people are hurt: "Its Buddhas will".

Taking responsibility like germanic culture don't exist. No self criticism.

(Its amazing how much progress Thailand have done economically the last 25 years. People earn on average 3 times more money. Compare with west. I haven't got a rise last 15 years since all money is used in Sweden to immigration so they can kill the ethnic population quicker)

It's amazing how Farangs accuse Thais for being nationalistic while at the same time they bash Asian refugees and immigrants for coming into their home countries.
Bash?

They might moan, but these countries have long histories of taking in refugees and migrants. Centuries of it.

Thailand can't even see fit to sort out the hill tribes.

Edited by Thai at Heart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did someone forget t tell them high income = high living costs? Do they think pad thai will still cost 30 baht when everyone is earning 50K a month? Look what has happened to prices when Yingluck told everyone to pay 15K minimum wage. Talk about the land of make-believe!!

Indeed, for many many years now, neither party understands the most simple economics.... More money, more inflation and higher cost of living.....

cheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at somewhere like Singapore that dragged itself from the dirt to be a thriving leading example of how things can be done, with the type of government they had, in a very small geographical space, and that it took a few decades to get there, yet still considered a success story....

Then look at Thailand which is substantially larger, and it's agricultural base more than service or manufacturing, and a 'different' level of education. I would expect that to achieve this would even with optimism, be a multi-generational endeavour.

I would suggest the pursuit of happiness rather than maximum baht in pocket.

It actually took Singapore 20 years to reach the high income country (using per capital income of USD12,735) from independence to 1990. It is now a developed country and the 10 richest country with per capital of USD56,000. Thailand is in much better economic shape than Singapore in the 70s. Moreover Thailand has more natural resources and a large population and a fast developing neighbouring countries which Singapore does not have. Thailand will have to grow 5-6% GDP for next 10 years which is possible if we have a discipline government and a visionary leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes stick a uniform on them and they know everything. The only people who will be in the high income in ten years will be the Military generals.

Just out of interest anyone know if they've raised their own wages?

rijit

Who needs wage increase when they have corruption? Corruption money is tax free too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen a lot of negative comments in this thread, but let's try to make a real evaluation of this statement:

1. "High Income Country" is a term that refers to a country with a nominal GNI (Gross National Income) per capita of US$ 12,735 or above.

This threshhold changes every year, according to the inflattion in a few major economies.

2. You can see the list of countries by GNI per capita here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GNI_%28nominal,_Atlas_method%29_per_capita

3. Thailand currently has a GNI per capita of US$ 5,410, which puts it in the "Upper-middle-income" group

4. In order to reach the threshhold of US$ 12,735, the Thai GNI per capita in US$ needs to grow by 135% (((12,735 / 5,410) - 1) x 100)

5. How long would it take?

If the GNI per capita grows by 3% per year (quite fast, but achievable), it would take Thailand 29 years to reach the "High Income Country" threshhold.

If the GNI per capita grows by 5% per year (very unlikely), it would take Thailand 18 years to reach the "High Income Country" threshhold.

Personally, I think a 3% per year growth rate is much more realistic than 5%. It may be even lower, at 2-2.5%.

If I had to make a bet on this, I would put it at 35-40 years (so around the year 2050/55).

Spot on. Absolutely correct as the example of Malaysia show.

Malaysia entered the lower middle-income economies in 1969 and joined the upper middle-income countries in 1996.

Malaysia has been in the lower middle- income economies for 27 years, and is now stuck for 20 years in the upper middle-income trap (in 2014) with average growth from 2000–14 at 2.6%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely, perfectly on track.

1% of the population consisting of the heads of the Junta, the RTP and others at the trough will be fabulously wealthy.

The rest of the population will be scratching around in the dirt looking for the money to buy fertilizer for their next rice crop.

Developed countries are distinguished from third world countries because of the size of their middle classes.

From what I have seen in the last year, the middle class Thai business owners I know are having their financial interests decimated.

On its current path Thailand is heading back to the stone age.

Edited by Bulldozer Dawn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""