maximadz

I recently received this by emai (it was sent to the staff at LICMU having a meeting today)l and Matt said it was okay to post:

Dear All,

I do think it is a very good idea to set the record straight. Here are some facts that I am happy to provide evidence for anywhere and anyplace:

....

I would be liable for nothing; however, I am still willing to pay 40%) and LICMU should refund 60%. As it stands at the moment, I have so far refunded over 800,000 baht while LICMU has refunded NOTHING.

I do not believe this is fair and welcome any meeting with LICMU in a court of law to decide this matter. I will, of course, be attending with ALL my evidence.

All the best,

Matt

Hello everyone! I was just reader here until now, but today I have my 5 cents to this thread.

I like this message, to be honest. That fact that Matt is going to refund 40% make this looking more realistically for me. I just don't believe that businessman, who Matt certainly is, was going to pay for someone's else faults. I however want my 100% (~130% to be precise). I believe that the right way to get money back is to sue CMU (or that company who received money according to our receipts). I'm not alone here with such thoughts perhaps, so maybe we could share lawyer expenses? I think local lawyer is able quite easily collect information about all the legal entities involved and pick right one to sue. BTW: If others who share this idea can trust Matt enough then we could address him to use his lawyer?

Regards,

Max

Hey guys, is anyone interested in? Last week I changed my visa to 2xTourist at Lao. I guess many others have done the same, so we have plenty of time to run it legal way. Not as plenty to sit here and dispute who was Matt "Dr." or "Mr." but enough for constructive things. Maybe I suggest something so obviously wrong that no one reply, so give me a hint, please.

Max.

I recently received this by emai (it was sent to the staff at LICMU having a meeting today)l and Matt said it was okay to post:

Dear All,

I do think it is a very good idea to set the record straight. Here are some facts that I am happy to provide evidence for anywhere and anyplace:

....

I would be liable for nothing; however, I am still willing to pay 40%) and LICMU should refund 60%. As it stands at the moment, I have so far refunded over 800,000 baht while LICMU has refunded NOTHING.

I do not believe this is fair and welcome any meeting with LICMU in a court of law to decide this matter. I will, of course, be attending with ALL my evidence.

All the best,

Matt

Hello everyone! I was just reader here until now, but today I have my 5 cents to this thread.

I like this message, to be honest. That fact that Matt is going to refund 40% make this looking more realistically for me. I just don't believe that businessman, who Matt certainly is, was going to pay for someone's else faults. I however want my 100% (~130% to be precise). I believe that the right way to get money back is to sue CMU (or that company who received money according to our receipts). I'm not alone here with such thoughts perhaps, so maybe we could share lawyer expenses? I think local lawyer is able quite easily collect information about all the legal entities involved and pick right one to sue. BTW: If others who share this idea can trust Matt enough then we could address him to use his lawyer?

Regards,

Max