Thrilla

Couldn't this POS make more money in Germany ?

You can get laid on Soi 22 ?

Impound their taxi for a week and jail 'em for a week ..the taxi owners will make the drivers pay the weeks rental and start being a little more careful about the drivers they rent to.

How generous, as I'm sure he and certainly his wife & children would never have stooped to using the current stinking facilities

They could be 50% right

Is it just me, or does this seem like a botched / amateurish effort ? Put me in a speeding cab with a bucket of thumb tacks and I could injure several people in that part of BKK - even after the shops had closed. Either mistimed or someone looking for attention - it will be interesting to see where this goes.

Or, there is the possibility of a False Flag...

I concur, If you have a look at whats happening all over the world, no pun intended MrWorldwide haha, my feeling this is a false flag event as well..... lets scare everyone into thinking they need protection from the crazy terrorists...

With the well documented and proven mendacity of the Thaksin/red shirts I doubt Prayut needs to stoop to your ilks mentality

I don't think the US government would have a problem with anyone speaking with Republicans and Democrats. The point is there is now NO freedom of speech here.

The US government isn't in a state of 'martial law' because of a corrupt and incompetent government killing it's own citizens.

'The point is' you still have the freedom to post your misleading tripe here on ThaiVisa

Did they get James ?

Not even the best drummer in the Beatles so the joke goes.

Get a new jokebook - the reality is, Ringo swung hard like no other drummer at the time.

He was known as the best drummer in Liverpool ...that's why they got him in the band !

There were more skilled players such as Mitch Mitchell, John Bonham, etc, etc but no one had that compelling straight ahead Ringo swing

Boonsong turning yellow ?

Going to a private funeral is hardly provoking others, were there yellow shirts there to provoke? They were sending off a friend who would probably be honoured by their gesture. I find it disgusting that people not associated with the deceased would want to destroy his funeral.

How exactly did this "destroy his funeral" ?

Everybody peacefully complied

I find it disgusting that 'people not associated with the deceased' would intentionally pervert an OP to imply a 'destruction' that never happened !

They're not trying to push an amnesty bill through at three o'clock in the morning ..are they ?

Who is the junta to say what people can or cannot wear to a funeral to show respect to a friend. When one of my close friends died we all wore blue. This was his request and if the police tried to stop us then they would have probably had a riot on thier hands. A total dictatorship telling people how to mourn and grieve and extremely offensive and sickening.

Making overt political statements at a funeral in these troubled times is not necessary but 'extremely offensive and sickening' and an obvious provocation !

How about some dignity and decency ?

Probably an ancient remedy that's been used successfully for hundreds of years

"Most NLA members want Yingluck to clarify the exact figure of losses of the scheme,"

I doubt she can clarify anything.....she never knew anything she was never capable of being a PM.

The only thing she's good at, is crying and thanking people 3 times.

you forgot shopping as well....

........and First Class World Travel. She does have one skill which may come in handy, perjury, though she is apparently inept at that as well.

I am really starting to wonder how many young teenage members we have now on TV with responses like these? Sounds like the comments I usually read on youtube, I guess next they will bring up is her mulberry boots as the "smoking gun" proof against her for corruption and conspiracy. Seems that serious debate has left the building.

Indeed, no "smoking gun" frivolity is being applied, serious debate and serious charges have her now in the court building answering serious questions - did you not notice ?

And that's 'Burberry' !

how can they impeach someone who does not hold office??? it's absurd

How can posters keep presenting this absurd inanity ?

The 'legal point' is to ban politicians for their past transgressions

Please try and keep up

your grasp is... well... less than a 'Thrilla' there is no 'legal point' that you proffer i suggest you leave the Chang alone and concentrate on the issues? now let's start again? she holds NO office so HOW can they impeach her? get it?

ok have another swig

Oh I comprehend this - and the language better than yourself -

The stark reality is, there she was on Friday defending herself - did you miss it ?

how can they impeach someone who does not hold office??? it's absurd

How can posters keep presenting this absurd inanity ?

The 'legal point' is to ban politicians for their past transgressions

Please try and keep up

No it is you that must keep up.Various senior lawyers and legal academics have queried the use of the impeachment instrument in the case of someone who holds no office and under a constitution that no longer exists.Any crimes committed by politicians can be dealt with laws under the existing statute book - except of course those guilty of sedition and high treason that have awarded themselves free pardons.

But being impeached she is !

As I said ..please try and keep up

how can they impeach someone who does not hold office??? it's absurd

How can posters keep presenting this absurd inanity ?

The 'legal point' is to ban politicians for their past transgressions

Please try and keep up

This guy's an obvious walking bust, what took them so long ?

I don't know Neversure, you answer the question. I Policed on the streets for over 2 decades. I carry a lot of wounds from carrying out my duties diligently and never taking a step backwards. I've been shot at, stabbed, kicked, punched, wrestled to the ground. I put myself between angry men and been involved in so many incidents they've all blurred together.

I never hid in an office and I never delayed getting to an incident. I've been in more than my fair share of scraps and dangerous situations. I've been to sieges and a few if my mates never came home from jobs, I was on scene several times when this happened. Nothing glorious about any of it.

Maybe you think I am a coward, I don't care.

What I am is though, is alive. I survived what I was exposed to and wi all the experienced I gained I formed an educated professional opinion that in these types of situations that people like the tactical police that are in attendance in Sydney are the ones that should have the firearms.

Sure, if a guy like LUST just happened to be there, all the better more, but LUST is LUST, I am me and you are not. You may be really capable with your rifle or side arm, but you haven't trained for,this type of incident and more than likely you arnt proficient in dealing with a situations where either a.) innocent people are in The fire line or b.) under fire yourself. The last thing the professionals need is some whacko shooting from the hip at this point. Take that as a Fact.

I've been shot at, have you? Let me tell you, I must be a coward because when it happened I remember wishing I was somewhere else, but I didn't run and stayed and did my job.

The stuff I'm saying is exactly the same information The Police Commissioner of NSW will say, I guess by your measure, we are Both wrong.

Anyway, all I can say is thank god, nobody of skill and mindset is in the building today....as it's most likely just going to complicate the situation.

You're certainly not a coward.

I've been shot at, mortared, rocketed, bombed etc and life is easy after that but your avatar is really <deleted> creepy & disturbing

Uhhhhmmm