Jump to content

mrfill

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,598
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mrfill

  1. 2 hours ago, billd766 said:

    Apart from 7/11s which are franchise from CP I think, plus the gas stations which are also owned by big business, most of rural Thailand depend on the mom and pop shops and the food cars.

     

    So the money will go to the smaller people, which is where it should go.

    Indeed.

    Often political parties promise tax cuts - which are basically of huge benefit to the rich and of little value to the not so rich. These are usually funded by some imagined future growth but are essentially a hand out of money - lots to the rich, a little to the poor.

     

    This is really not much different, except it is of benefit mainly to the poor. A rich person with billions in the bank is hardly bothered about 10000bt whereas most of the population of Thailand would benefit greatly. Keeping it as a fixed amount also considerably reduces the cost of administering the idea. 

     

    Of course, those with money (who stand to gain only a little), will complain bitterly about 'them' getting more than 'ME' and will use as much propaganda as possible to squash the idea.

    • Like 2
  2. 1 hour ago, PeeJayEm said:

    I compared my UK and Thailand domestic electricity kWh prices for Dec22 to Feb23.  The UK rate was about 500% (yes 5 times) the Thailand rate.  50p vs 10p.

    Thailand as a net importer of oil, gas and coal is subject to the same basic global market pricing.

    So it seems that either the UK has some highly inefficient structures in its  energy delivery model or Thailand has a huge price bomb overdue to explode.

     

    Or it could be that the UK has allowed the generators to maintain and even increase substantially their dividends by setting a very high price cap and making the public suck it up. Thailand has chosen to cap at a much lower rate.

    • Thumbs Up 1
  3. MDMA is crystalline.

    And its not new. It was initially invented in 1912, 111 years ago.

    It was described by the UK's 'drug czar' as being no more dangerous than horse riding.

    And it doesn't put you to sleep or deaden your senses so it cannot be described as a 'narcotic'

    However, while the substance itself is basically harmless, the crude method of production and general carelessness means that a badly prepared batch can be harmful because of impurities (MDME), similarly if it is mixed with a more dangerous substance (which is very much a Thai way).

    I would suggest that Ecstasy is rather sophisticated and too 'low key' for the enthusiastic locals but an ideal thing for a politician to start trying to spook uninformed people with.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...