gdf

Three of Three

Four of Eight

Four of eight

I recently took a former Thai employee of mine to court over failing to pay back a loan, the sum was considerable and warranted being pursued through the courts. I attended the Court on seven occasions and the Thai person never once attending and only submitted their testimony via their lawyer. Whilst the questions that they (The Thai) leveled at me had to be answered under oath their testimony was not. I lost the case despite the Court noting that the loan had been made and the transfer and paper trail with regard the money was clearly seen to be used by the person concerned. I feel the Court had sent a wrong message to the individual with regard this theft, the person now claims that they do not owe me anything as the courts have cleared them of the debt by stating that there was no loan agreement in writing so there could be no loan. Should common sense not prevail to show that justice can be seen to be done in Thailand.<BR clear=all>