Alex456

Don't waste your money, unless your wife is beating the child, you will not be given sole custody, no matter what she did in the past.

Thanks for the reply. Just heard today from the PI (one of the most reliable in Thailand) that I am the only husband she had and my son is her only kid. Got a very comprehensive report with registration numbers and all so it's 100% real. I will have to go for 50% custody for me to have say to my son education and everything else. Thanks again

Hello everyone,

I am wondering if any of you can help me. I am trying to get full custody of my son at the moment here in Bangkok. I was legally married and my name is in his birth certificate. I made the mistake of not having a translator when I signed the divorced papers. When I got it translated all we agreed at the time was OK except for one line where my now ex-wife stated that we were together for a longer time.

Here are the facts: We were together for a period of 4 years. We were legally married for 3 years and 9 months. However on the divorce paper she stated that we were together for a period of 6 years and we were legally married for 3 years and 9 months. This is a false statement on her part.

The only reason why someone would do that, as far as I can see from what I found online, is to cover up for not complying with the 310 days waiting time after a previous divorce or married already (bigamy is not against the law in Thailand). She told me she wasn’t married when I met her and right now I am looking for dirt on her to reinforce my case. I am planning to hire a PI to run a background check when the time comes, however the curiosity factor is not letting me sleep.

Anybody out there, by looking at my case, can see any other reason outside the above ones? Perhaps I will be able to sleep once again.

Hello everyone,

I am wondering if any of you can help me. I am trying to get full custody of my son at the moment here in Bangkok. I was legally married and my name is in his birth certificate. I made the mistake of not having a translator when I signed the divorced papers. When I got it translated all we agreed at the time was OK except for one line where my now ex-wife stated that we were together for a longer time.

Here are the facts: We were together for a period of 4 years. We were legally married for 3 years and 9 months. However on the divorce paper she stated that we were together for a period of 6 years and we were legally married for 3 years and 9 months. This is a false statement on her part.

The only reason why someone would do that, as far as I can see from what I found online, is to cover up for not complying with the 310 days waiting time after a previous divorce or married already (bigamy is not against the law in Thailand). She told me she wasn’t married when I met her and right now I am looking for dirt on her to reinforce my case. I am planning to hire a PI to run a background check when the time comes, however the curiosity factor is not letting me sleep.

Anybody out there, by looking at my case, can see any other reason outside the above ones? Perhaps I will be able to sleep once again.