Loiner

No tag, no cushy hotel or benefits.

Fury about some sort of disrespect to the Leader of a corrupt and badly governed old soviet, but happily spews a constant barrage of foul abuse at Boris. Sheer hypocrisy?

Because it’s not the UK, the land of plenty, where the streets are paved with our benefits.

Well that’s a troll post if ever I saw one. How do you get away with it? Give us a clue.

I don’t know how they manage to do that. You have to ask one as they are pretty good at it. Haven’t you got a Rumanian mate on speed dial to tell you? How many millions went to Poland in child benefit? Great scam - anybody managing to do that for Thai kids? I often use stereotyping. It saves a lot of time and is usually accurate, or the stereotypical would not be commonplace enough to arise.

So how have 6.1 million of them applied for settled status? Anything to do with their benefit claims?

I’ve seen many of them loitering around sequestered Britannia hotels. Terrible places but free and better than a mud hut. I haven’t been able to check but these must be the ones with the porte cochere paved with gold.

Not true at all. We very rarely hear anything from racists and bigots. MSM does all it can to censor anything it does not agree with. All we do hear is the bleating of lefty activists and bleeding hearts.

Hardly a home goal as the rule ignoring French were not meeting their own EU responsibilities under the Dublin Agreement anyway. Of any home goals were scored it was them. Has they sorted out the scroungers at point of entry, and Merkel not invited another million, I dare say many in the UK would have swung to a Remain vote. They lost out on all our contributions and a lot of trade.

Because those are their rules. The Dublin Agreement.

Here sir! It’s absolutely true: Somalian and Kurd able bodied fighting age men who cowardly ran, leaving womenfolk, to try lie and cheat their way into UK benefits. Ukrainian women and children refugees, who’s men stayed to fight for their country. Big difference eh, what’s racist about that? Any comparison of skin tone is purely coincidental.

That’s us not those already from overseas.

They are not refugees, they are sponging bogus asylum seekers. Their status is law breaker as soon as they arrive illegally by dinghy or the back of a wagon. So jail and deportation.

We don’t do baying or outrage and leave that for Lib/Lab/Rejoiners. They usually have time for that while we’re at work. We also don’t find the policy appalling, on the contrary rather appealing. That’s why Boris got his landslide victory. Nobody here enjoys protection from ECHR. We don’t need any because UK is not the type of country it was set up to protect against. Our Magna Carta has worked for our rights for 800 years. The ECHR and ‘uman rites has only worked for those who come here to abuse them and our country.

Little wins. Wait for the next boat load.

Probably just building up even more public opinion against the ECHR. When it gets close to needing votes for an election he will kick the ECHR into touch and enjoy another landslide.

Although the UK did not actually need to, in this case some more of the spongers were saved and the flight did not take off for the remainder. What has failed to be pointed out by the gloating virtue signallers and posters here, is that the UK does not always follow what the ECHR thinks.

See the facts above. Your interpretation does not matter.

No. This is only your interpretation of what you hope would be the case to prevent Article 16 being invoked.

It may have had a real need when it was established by the UK. Since then despots and rogue state members have been allowed to stain its’ reputation. It means nothing and those states who continually break its’ rules know that they can continue with impunity. The UK has nothing to learn from, or be party to, rulings from another European toothless tiger with only hot air implications. Boris should fill the plane and send it tonight.

Some people don’t realise or admit there are plenty of examples where the UK does not agree or comply with the wishes of the ECHR. There’s no real need to and no real implications.

As opposed to self awarded honorary doctorates from the Garouniad school of blinkered lefty studies and misinformation.

Here’s a fact for you: The Vienna Convention does not contain anything about The Withdrawal Agreement or The Northern Ireland Protocol. What you have done is cherry pick and quoted something that you think supports your position.

While ever we were part of the EU our Supreme Court was not supreme. They are now. Some people like to think our courts are still bound by the whims of another organisation the tin pot ECHR. They are not.

Those posters have no idea about international law or any of the matters they rabbit into about. They simply parrot each other after reading something from their Grauniad that was quoted by some lefty Boris hating self declared eggspurt. .