Jump to content

petgunya

Member
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by petgunya

  1. We just checked online and neither the Ministry of Foreign Affairs nor TAT official website make any reference to the "unlimited land border crossing" provision having been formalized!

     

    So we just rang to Maisae Immigration who confirmed the 2-walks per calendar year limit is still in place. We then rang to Chiangmai Immigration who also confirmed the 2-walk restriction and said we can use the option of a 60-day extension for the 1,900 baht fee. So I think that settles it. The “unlimited walk entries” is not yet formalized (and for all we know may never be).

    • Like 1
  2. 9 hours ago, bumofdabeach said:

    Depends on what type visa you have. Non o multiple entry is no problem but if visa on arrival there is limit. Keep in mind this is last month of calendar year

    Sent from my SM-J250F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
     

    Thanks for your reply. I had a Multiple Entry Non-O which expired in August and so the next exit I did in October was on an expired visa and same day return I got a 30 day walk in entry stamp (the 1st one for the year) valid till November 26th upon which I did a 2nd exit and walk in and again got a 30 day entry stamp but unlike previous years there was no written or verbal notification as to the 2 walks per year limit. As I thought I was going to be leaving to go home for Xmas I didnt bother inquiring further but now I'm not going so I thought I'd check into it before going the 1900bht 60-day extension of stay route for the time being.

  3. Is anyone aware of any updates on the subject of the previous announcement of unlimited land border crossings?

    On November 26th 2018 I did a 2nd land border crossing at Maesai/Tachilek but unlike previous years I didn't get any written or verbal notice regarding having reached the calendar year limit for border crossings. I was just waved through as per normal procedure.

     

    I will check with immigration but thought I check in here first to see if anyone had any relevant information.

  4. 3 minutes ago, jeab1980 said:

    Wasnt in any way trying to annoy you or undermine your extremely good post. I suspect the guy having a hissy fit was after a TV there i belive now you have to show funds for this in Savannakhet now. I seem to recal some threads on it on here

    No offense taken at all. Yes it seemed strange that the guy was freaking out and clearly was telling his wife that they wanted to see bank statements. He repeated that several times and seemed to be in shock over it. 

    After seeing him coming away from the window visibly distressed and carrying on about them wanting to see bank statements, my immediate thought was "oh,.. well it seems the golden days at Savanakhet have ended and now they're asking to show bank statements". I wasn't really concerned as I had Kasikorn bank statements with me just in case, even though they didn't show a 400k balance, they did show over 40,000/mthly income so that should have been fine.

    But if I wasn't asked for any bank statements for my Non-Imm 'O', then why was the English guy asked,.. and what kind of visa might he have been applying for?

  5. 59 minutes ago, Boycie said:

    Could you please explain more. I thought the reason people went to Savannakhet is because they do not have to show proof of funds?

    Yes,.. Savannakhet consulate staff did not ask me to provide any proof or show of funds at all. They gave me a 12 month multiple entry visa based on marriage but I still need to do 90-day exit/entry runs as the visa allows for a maximum of 90 days per visit.

    As another poster has pointed out, I can get an extension based on marriage at any immigration office within Thailand provided I show adequate funds (which I think is either 400,000baht in a bank account for the past 3 months,.. or a monthly income of at least 40,000 baht per month. Don't quote me on that as I am not 100% certain and will be checking the actual requirement myself prior to applying).

  6. 34 minutes ago, jeab1980 said:

    Hes getting confused i belive. Savanakhet you can get non o based on marriage showing no proof as we know.

    For some reason he thought or thinks you can get an extension based on marriage there to. As we all know Extensions based on marriage (not a marriage visa)( an extension of your non o) is only available in country at immigration offices.

    I thought he was a wee bit confused when i was reading about what his wife asked at consulate

     

    I wasn't at all confused. I was simply under the impression (as I believe many people who read these threads on Savannakhet visa trips are also), that it was possible to get a marriage visa (not a Non-Imm 'O') from Savannakhet without showing any proof of funds and which permitted one to stay in Thailand for 12 months without the need to do 90-day border crosses. That summation was arrived at after reading countless posts on this forum over many years.

    Clearly I wasn't paying close enough attention, and clearly that was the wrong impression as I soon found out at Savannakhet. I knew that I could get a 12 month Non-Imm 'O' anyway so I wasn't really too bothered either way. The English guy ahead of me at the consulate window also seemed to be under the impression that he would be getting a "Marriage Visa" and was visibly freaked out when the consulate staff insisted upon bank statements (maybe there was some other reason for them asking for bank statements. I don't know and I didn't talk to the guy as he seemed to be quite stressed out over the issue).

    With regards to your comment "As we all know Extensions based on marriage (not a marriage visa)( an extension of your non o) is only available in country at immigration offices." You'll have to pardon my ignorance there because I wasn't aware of that, and I suspect that there could be one or two others that didn't/don't know that either.

    Now its all clear and I'm grateful for having the updated knowledge and experience that I'm sure will be of some considerable assistance and comfort in the future.

     

     

  7. 1 hour ago, dotpoom said:

    If it's ok I'll wait for the paperback edition. Sorry, just being funny but a bit long for me.

    Some people don't like reading a lot of text. That's fine and I appreciate that. Next time I might make a video which I'm sure would be a lot more entertaining. The main thing I wanted to convey was as much detail as possible as I found that similar informative posts really helped me in preparing for this trip. Cheers :smile:

  8. 1 hour ago, ubonjoe said:

    I think the officer was commenting about the 2 visa exempt entries per calendar year at land border crossings rule.

    Yes that's right Joe. My visa expired in March and a got my last 90 day stamp the day before it expired, That took me to June when I then did my first 30 day walk-out/walk-in at Masae which was valid till July 12th upon which I did another walk-out/walk-in at Masea (my 2nd and final walk in allowed for the next calendar year) valid till August 10th. Chiangmai Immigration told me that I could have got a 60 extension based on marriage for 1,900bht if showing 40,000bht monthly income, but I decided to go and get a new 12-month visa instead at Savannakhet instead of putting off the inevitable for another 2 months. 

  9. Thanks Ubon Joe,

     

    that's very useful information.

     

    Yes I am married to a Thai and we have 3 Thai born children.

     

    The 60 day extension would cost B1,900,.. is that correct? And are they likely to require seeing any proof of cash on hand or funds at Chiangmai office?

     

    Can you confirm that the border walk-in stay limit is currently 15  days or has it reverted back to 30?

  10. I have a similar issue to the OP but with a variation.

     

    Currently have a multiple non-O visa (family) which expired March 17th 2017.

    I went to Masae border on March 16th and did and exit and walk back in and was given 90 days no questions.

    That stay expires June 13th 2017.

    I was intending to fly back to Australia to renew but that's now not possible for a month or two.

    What options do I have to extend stay without leaving the country?

    I assume that if I did another Masae walk out - walk in trip that I'd only get 15 days and not 30. Is that correct?

    For  immediate time being cannot show proof of funds including any 20k bht (not that that has ever been requested before)

     

    Thanks in advance for any input and clarification.

     

  11. Has this been published in the Royal Gazette and thus making it a law?

    It is a ministerial regulation not a law. The reason for it not starting until March is for the 60 day requirement from the date it was published.

    A couple of relevant observations here;

    If its a ministerial regulation and not a law, then how could it be administered with any lawful relevance?

    Even so, March 20th is 60 days hence from Jan 23rd, which doesn't occur for another 11 days. Does that indicate some anomaly or is the March 20th date a discretionary "buffer" date applied by the ministry?

    Despite this prospectively being only a ministerial regulation and not law, - that probably would make no difference to the overstayer that voluntarily departs the country after March 20th and receives a red stamp ban from the immigration officer who is simply following his directives and as far as he's concerned it "is" law or at least lawful enough having come from the superior officers of the Immigration Bureau.

    Any subsequent attempt to board a flight to Thailand by the overstayer with an annotated ban would fail, and thus the significance of whether the ban was lawful or simply a ministerial regulation would make zero difference to the person banned!

    My point being,.. whether or not this becomes a law on March 20th won't make any difference to voluntary departers who will receive bans upon exit by immigration officers who are simply doing their job. It may have some relevance to those being caught and prosecuted who subsequently go before a Thai judge, who then one would assume is obligated to act according to the law and not to ministerial or bureaucratic policy.

    Your thoughts on this Ubon Joe?

×
×
  • Create New...