new2here
-
Posts
1,001 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by new2here
-
-
Just another example of the rampant inflation in Thailand. In 'normal' countries prices might increase by at the most five per cent, but in Thailand it is often 20 per cent or more. And that, obviously, is why Thailand is no longer the bargain that it once was.
And again, we have an example of the anger and aggression that lurks just below the surface here. Maybe the rapid price rises are a small part of that.
This to me is a key. If I ran it, I would “peg” any increase - or decrease - to that of the annual operating cost index inflation adjusted... so each year there would most likely be some level of change - be that B0.50 up or even 0.25 down, whatever the math reveals.
What I would avoid is a situation where no increase are put up for X years - say 3 years for example - they are put up some percentage.. it’s my opinion that the conversation will only be about the new fare hike and nothing about the fact there was no increase in past years... it’s human nature as I see it.
So... I would insure that *any* mathematically supported increase or decrease in cost, was implemented yearly... I guess IMHO, it’s publicly more palatable to do an annual 1% rise or the like, than it is go with 0% for 3 years, then a 4% hike in the fourth year... only the 4% is going to get coverage - not the fact that the preceding 3 years where without increases.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app -
This has been discussed several times before. Some schools pay for WP issuance and renewal, some don't. It's also been mentioned before 'new regulation' is just fluff, in fact there is no rule from the Ed. ministry in regard to who pays.
I agree. Plus the whole work permit issue isn’t really under the Ministry of Education per se. The permitting process really is the domain of the Ministry of Labour. So I personally would be hard pressed to see a situation whereby regulations set by Ministry A would be automatically and unilaterally applied to processed that fall squarely under the jurisdiction of Ministry B - unless Ministry B “signed off” on such or such regulation was unilaterally imposed by larger governmental/court action.
I do agree that some, I dare say the majority, of schools do pay (either upfront, upon issuance or reimburse after contract fulfillment) for cost of the work permit for their teachers. My opinion is that the opposite is true for the cost of extensions of stay (for employment purposes) — that seems to me to usually be borne by the employee him/herself. However there will always be exceptions.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I was kind of on his side.... UNTIL the allegation (I say allegation as this is reported and not backed up by independent evidence) that the SIM was removed and data wiped... THAT to me is hard to now justify a “I was trying to return it” mindset..
I wasn’t there.. haven’t seen all the evidence.. but for me, it’s hard for me to see a credible reason why one would want to or need to remove the SIM and wipe the data (again, IF in fact that is what happened) if the true motive was to return the item to its rightful owner.
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect- 7
-
In the current climate, I simply wouldn't hand over any rent or deposit money until and unless the landlord fills in the TM30 form and provides the additional documents required.
In fairness though, both my current and my previous landlord did just that without me even prompting them - but from this report and similar ones in the past, it's obvious that some (many?) landlords aren't familiar with their duty to report a foreign tenant yet. Ultimately it's us, the foreigners, who will be screwed.
I agree. I’ve had several close friends who’ve been in this situation. Not that their landlord simply wasn’t willing to do so- only that they were wholly unaware that such regulation was in fact mandatory.
While not in Bangkok, each time my friends ran into this issue, they asked an IO from their local office call their landlord and explain what the mandate is, what’s needed for compliance and the process.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app -
Can planes doors be actually opened during flight? Answer...NO. The door is like a plug being pushed into place by the internal compression, and I would also guess that there is some kind of electronic lock controlled by the pilot.
For safety reasons there is no remote “locking” function on any cabin door. Each door is its own stand-alone unit and operates irrespective of how the others operate. The only functionality is either to arm or disarm the slide inflation upon door activation, and this is always a manual function by cabin crew.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app -
For start, airlines should seriously consider keeping a proper restraining devices and not have to do with some bits and pieces of makeshift seatbelts as air rage nowadays becomes more frequent, and someone should take his doctor license away, this man is not fit to come near patients period...
Many airlines do in fact have them. They tend to use a plastic-cuff style — like a massive “zip-lock” cuff that can’t be undone, only cut with high pressure cutters. You see these on riot control teams commonly. But what each airline uses or has is somewhat dependent on the country they originate (and what laws, of any say on the matter) and individual airline policy (after internal discussion with departments like security, legal/risk management and operations)
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app -
There is one thing to be a whistleblower, and thats a good thing. The world would be much sorrier place without them
However Manning and Assange released thousands of totally unredacted documents, putting at risk the lives of agents and civilian informants.
That's not a whistleblower or a journalist, that is a traitor
This to me is where I have issues with his actions.. I agree.. I think the idea of a “whistle-blower” is a good thing.. I support laws that protect good-faith whistleblowers... but.. my supports isn’t unlimited. I think there can be cases where whistleblower actions can have real life risks to individuals.. and I think it’s fair to also acknowledge this is issue as well.
I do support Assange and his actions as a collective? I think the fact that it brought to light some government actions that I think are improper - is good... but I can’t also overlook the larger situation and that to me has clearly raised concerns for me.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app -
Ok, 300% does seem ambitious, but private hospitals are businesses.
This to me is an issue... I do think that as a private, for-profit enterprise, they do and should price themselves to in order to produce a return on equity that fairly, adequately and appropriately compensates their shareholders who have put up (with possible investment loss risk) assets to form and run the business.
That said, I am not wholly against some form of price controls that insure reasonable access to said services.
I think it has to be a balance.. I don’t think you can run - from a cost or revenue perspective - a state/public hospital the same way you can (or should) a privately owned hospital.
To me the state really shouldn’t be in the marketplace to turn a net profit on their healthcare system — this doesn’t mean it should run at a loss, but I do think that as a state enterprise, it’s *primary* focus should be on delivery of services to the public...
At the end of the day, if you somehow regulate the market such that investors can’t earn a return that reasonably compensates them for taking the investment risk to run a health care facility, then I suspect you’ll see less investment in that sector - and that would mean the public sector would have to be equipped to handle the demand.
I think a key here is fair and full price disclosure... I would be a bigger fan if required up-front price disclosure was mandatory and implemented.. That way, one could make an informed consumer decision.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app- 1
-
Another example of the GREEDY ARMY and police in charge of thailand wanting more money in fines and also the harrassment of tourists , they are so stupid they harrass tourists the people who spend money here in thailand , its about time to go to a different country im seriously looking at it now
Respectfully I have to disagree. It sounds like (only from what’s written and how I am interpreting it) the check point was already there... so I don’t know that I can agree with “harass” as the check point would be in place for everyone who passes. The other part is that (how the money is used or handled is a separate matter) the so long as what was cited/ticketed was in fact in violation of the law, then again, I can’t really call it harass either.
I’m not saying the RTP are wholly blameless or act with best intentions everyday- but for me to agree to a claim of “harass” I have to see the the citizen was largely not violating the law at the time and/or wasn’t suspected of doing so at that time.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app- 1
-
I would wonder why can’t they use a more low-tech method... I recall that in some places they use a toll ticket or similar instrument as the means to identify you and your “start time” .. and when you pass the next/exit toll booth, they now can calculate the time it took you to travel between the two points.. and if mathematically the only way you could have made it from point A to point B was by excess speed, then a fine is imposed right then and there.
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect- 1
-
What if they still have to take you if you refuse to buy a ticket - which I understand to be the case.
I suspect what will happen (and is common for many carriers) and many carriers legal contract with you permits, is that the existing onward/return tickets value will be used as the principle means to “pay” for your repatriation...
Also remember that so long as the carrier that is tasked with repatriating you is the same carrier who issued your ticket (that means the first 3 numbers of your e-ticket) they can always make changes to it— even if your ticket had you flying out of Thailand on a different carrier (I.e. interline) that issuing carrier has a lot of control over it and, by association, the funds/value it represents.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
-
does anyone know best way to send money from bkk to usa bank....
Lots of ways... but I think you need to know some specifics of the money - what’s it’s origin, the total amount, the timeline that it must arrive in the US, your (as the sender) and the receivers risk tolerance to loss (in the case of carrying cash) and fees.
I’ve done lots of international transfers via BBL to my US account - but since I work, and have supplied my work credentials to BBL, the process is quite easy... I’ve also taken cash - in excess of $10,000... and so long as I’ve filed the required US FINCEN form upon arrival, the matter went smoothly.. I’ve done it a few times with a paper bank check (which if over $10,000 still requires FINCEN) and that too was incident-free.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app- 1
-
It's a very busy area between Sukhumvit Road and the railroad. I have witnessed several, presumed drug busts in the day time, a few years ago while living close by. The dealer always runs away and always gets caught in the end. Not all the cops are always in uniform but it seems those big boots are the best for kicking the dealers. I mostly agree with the police, the tough measures are required in that neighbourhood. All I was saying that when the cops want to stop me after illegal u-turn or such, they should wear something official and not look like highway bandits.
I agree in that fleeing by the suspect is a bad move and allows for the situation to escalate.. that said, I also think that how that situation is addressed by law enforcement also matters.
I don’t think that a fleeing suspect should simply be allowed to flee without any police attempts to stop or restrain the suspect.. but.. I think those efforts to stop/detain have to be measured and take the safety of EVERYONE - that’s the suspect(s), law enforcement and the public - into account.. as well as the risk to property, be that public or private.
In this case, as it’s presented, I think the family squarely owns the genesis to the issue... it sounds like they knowingly chose to flee .. but the matter also appears to be handled in a manner that resulted in moderately serious consequences.. and the police owns that part. -
I don’t really have a huge issue with the need to register where a foreigner is living/staying while in the Kingdom.. yes, the optics may look bad, but in the end, to me it’s not a deal-breaker... do I think there’s a huge need to register foreigners? Not really- but it’s a national law - so it is what it is.
where I do have issue is the real-world risk that IF a landlord/housemaster/condo/hotel doesn’t do as the law requires them to do, often the foreigner is stuck.. and that to me is where the fix needs to be. I’ve also heard reports - albeit second hand - that some small apartments won’t rent to foreigners simply because of the added regulations (like reporting them to immigration) and other perceived issues/risks. True or not, I don’t know.. but I can see where this may occur.
I’m all for hitting the foreigner when they fail to do their 90-day reports- as that falls squarely on the foreigner... and in the same way, I think any failure to properly register a foreigner who is staying in the Kingdom needs to be squarely put on the landlord/housemaster, etc... each side has their role.
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect -
I agree with the general opinion... you’ll probably need to speak directly with KBank as I’ll bet they aren’t going to address account-specifics via an email-like platform.
I wonder IF you initiated the transaction with Iberia using their (Iberia’s) online platform (thus a CNP or Card Not Present coded transaction) or did you deal face-to-face with Iberia at like a city ticket office or the like?
I’ve had this issue - albeit with a BBL credit card - overseas before, largely because the transaction was auto-flagged as being fraud-suspected —— which I found out later was the programmatic result and based on a combination of several variables such the MCC or Merchant Category Code and transaction code CNP.
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect -
What I’m interested to see is what will the impacted schools do with any current (or former for that matter) students who benefited from the alleged criminal actions.
I’m also intrigued as to what will be the eventual outcome of the students (who initially applied to, but ultimately weren’t admitted to one of the impacted schools) suit that effectively claims they were denied admission due to an unfair/rigged or process.
Sounds like the schools themselves didn’t gain financially -so unjust enrichment sounds off the table, but I could see the possible use of Title IX as a potential means to ends.
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect -
Duty-free? Really! A lot of the products they sell can be found cheaper on the high-street. I don't even bother anymore, besides they haven't stocked Marlboro for years and It's only one of the biggest global brands.
I think what many people don’t fully realize is that duty-free sales at the airport really is only non-taxable.. this does not say that the BASE price (call me the MSRP) isn’t possibly higher than at traditional, non-airport retail channel may offer pricing.
I think this is also the reason that a fair percentage of items sold at duty free are things like tobacco, alcohol and cosmetics - all classes of products that tend to also carry high/higher levels of taxation.
From a sales perspective, it doesn’t make sense to devote retail floor space in an airport duty free type venue, to products that either don’t carry higher tax rates (thus the ability to highlight a large savings percentage) or whose base price is low (this requiring much higher volume sales) and/or don’t sell in sufficient quantities that then generate revenues sufficient to offset the cost per square/meter.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app- 2
-
I have submitted exactly on the 15th day and received my receipt with the stamp saying send in 15 day next time. Also I have sent reports 16 days in advance and received the receipt with no comments. I would guess that one day over is accepted due to mail delivery times.
Thanks, I am beginning to think the red stamp isn’t a “you did it wrong” type of warning (which is how I have personally interpreted it) but more of a general reminder.
The other part I can’t determine is what if 15 days just so happens to be a Saturday/Sunday/holiday. My guess is that you’d advance up (more than 15) and not push back (to less than 15) but haven’t gotten really clear guidance on the matter
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app -
I have a question that I can’t seem to get answered or by someone at CW with reference to the date or time that I can submit a MAIL in 90 day report.
In the past, when I’ve done it, the new report slip (computer generated now and not the tear-off section of the TM7) was red stamped “Next time please send 15 days before the due date”. But I have always sent it well before— usually received (via EMS) around 18+/- days before.
However...
On this last report, I sent in my paperwork and it arrived at CW 18 days before but was sent back, the very next day, and I got a call from someone at Immigration that said I was too early. She said “15 days”...
I know that if it’s received LESS than 15 days they can (and I hear usually will) return it to you and now you’re essentially stuck doing an in-person report.
So... is it that I have to time it so that it’s received by CW *exactly* at the 15 day mark? Not 16 or 17 and not 14 or 13?
I called (and a Thai speaking friend asked) and was told the same “15 days”... but couldn’t/didn’t get clarity as to does 15 days mean ‘no less than..’ or ‘no more than’ or ‘exactly’
Also, IF it is in fact exactly 15 days, if that 15 day mark happens to fall on a non-working day (Saturday, Sunday or holiday) how is that accounted for.
I get it that CW doesn’t want reports coming in 30+ days early... not do they want reports coming in on the expiry date either... so the “15 days” makes operational sense. But I just can’t get a clear answer as to is it 15 days exactly, or what.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
-
I get the whole “tit-for-tat” idea... and generally I agree with it... but I also think from a real-world basis, this issue, isn’t one that will always be a true tit-for-tat.
I say that because it’s think there is the notion that a citizen of country A may be viewed by country B differently as an potential tourist as opposed the reverse, a citizen of country B coming to country A as a tourist.
Is that fair? Arguably no, but I do think it does real-world differences in citizenship and migration (be that short-term tourist like or long term)
After all, I do think there is a credible reason why a person coming from a country with overall low economic development and opportunities maybe viewed as a >possible
Perhaps it’s unjust, but from a national interest basis, I get why a country might do so.
As such, I can’t see a a situation where the EU would require US nationals to get a hard visa (like going the actual embassy or the like as opposed to an online ESTA-like situation) due to national economic and immigration interest basis.
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect -
I am an American, but still a ways off “retirement” age or being eligible (based on age alone) for any of the traditional US social programs...
That said, I DO support the IDEA of a single payer system... BUT... I am concerned about: a) the costs obviously and b) what does this do/would this do to an individuals choice to “opt out” or want to use an alternative system.
I do believe that things with our health care system are “broken” .... but I don’t really think that scrapping the system we have now - and for the most part have used since “day one” and moving to a radically different system on a wholesale basis is real-world doable without major issues.
To me, I’d prefer some fix (and I am versed enough on the angles that encompass our system to really speak knowledgeably) that maintains the overall system we have now, but makes overall improvements and does so without major costs impacts.
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect- 1
-
I agree that at times it feels like there’s little “help”, but I do think at times there can be legitimate reasons why it is as such.
Take the US diplomatic missions as one example - they don’t “authenticate” documents as genuine/real; like educational degrees... and that can be a roadblock for overseas nationals who need such for jobs, permits and the like.
But.... I also think that there is a fair question to be asked that because educational degrees (in most all cases) are issued by one of thousands and thousands of State-level public institutions or privately owned institutions, I can see why a Federal-level entity, like an overseas US mission, would not or could not be in a position to place the full-faith and credibility onto a document that a federal-level entity didn’t issue.
Could they (the overseas missions) do more? Sure, i think there’s always room for more... but I can see a legitimate reason why some things are just no-go for an overseas, national-level entity to do for a citizen/national.
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect -
While I agree the legalities leave you in an unprotected position, to the issue of pay. It is my own personal experience that corporate training - assuming you have to design the curriculum and not using the corporations own material - I might ask for around B1,000 to B1,500 per hour.
But there’s lots of variables.
How many people?
Transportation issues for you?
What’s your qualifications?
How many hours/days?
Etc
All of these issues can bump up what I’d expect or drive down what I would expect...
Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I thought I’d post the experience of applying at TCT for a NEW 5yr license. My best friend went today and I went with him - so my report is first hand. My friend applied as having a degree in education from a US college and not thru other methods like testing (those infamous tests that may or may not be offered anymore) or having a teaching license from another country.
TCT is currently renovating the first floor of the building where teaching licenses (both temporary 2yr and permanent 5yr) are submitted, so the whole process has temporarily moved upstairs to the 2nd floor of the same building. A numbered queue system is still used.
Here is what his application package included:
a) The KS 01 application filled out
Note that the accepting officer reviewed EVERYTHING on this form several times and verified some data against TCT records on their computer.
b) The Professional Evaluation form.
The accepting officer checked carefully that each person (you must have 3+ people) who was on your “evaluation” form also included a copy of their own TCT card to prove their teaching status and tenure.
c) Copy of current passport.
The accepting officer wanted to see the whole series of extension of stays to cover the time that was written on the KS01. So, in my fiends case, that was 6 years, so the officer wanted to make sure that a copy of every extension of stay going back 6 years was included.
d) Copy of work permit.
You have to submit a copy of every page that has any stamp or writing on it, even if that was written (or printed by Labour) on it. Only wholly blank pages can be omitted.
e) 2 identical photos.
Interestingly, before my friend, we saw a few teachers who were turned away because the photo was the wrong size - too big. It MUST be that exact size as listed on the KS01. I suspect this is because the second photo will be used for plastic license card.
f) fee payment.
You have to pay the fee before. TCT can’t accept any payments at their office. So you have to do the fee payment by Pay-At-Post. 500 baht plus B10 service fee. Make sure the name on the receipt matches your name as on your KS01.
g) Professional Development
The KS01 does not appear to REQUIRE proof of professional development to apply, but normally as a condition of getting a second or third 2yr waiver, there usually is an expectation (enforced or not is another issue) that you’ve done some professional development. So, my friend enclosed a copy of his certificates for each professional development event he attended going back 6 years.
h) Proof of Degree.
HERE is where things got interesting. My friend had a copy of his degree, a copy of his transcript and a letter confirming his degree and details, sent directly from the university in a sealed envelope addressed TO HIM and mailed TO HIM and not to TCT.
The officer inspected the envelope CAREFULLY before opening, to see if it was still sealed. He then opened it and took out the 3 documents. He CLOSELY checked them and ultimately stapled them together with the envelope they came in.
He said to my friend that at processing they will check that the university is TCT approved and the degree itself was acceptable, but that “most American Universities” and “Education” majors were TCT compliant. He also said that because the degree, transcript and letter weren’t mailed DIRECTLY to TCT, that he had to keep the envelope as proof of how the documents came to TCT.
The officer did specifically say degrees are supposed to be mailed to TCT from the foreign colleges, but that at processing TCT will check. So, in the end, his degree and such were accepted, but I suspect will be subject to secondary inspection.
After about :15 of paperwork inspection and a few minutes of computer entry work my friends was done.
The officer said that processing time is TWO months and the license - if approved (and he did say “if approved”) would be mailed to his school. My friend asked if it could be mailed to him as the school might be closed for summer break, but the officer said “cannot”
The officer explained that first the application would be “verified” (he didn’t state what that exactly entails) by TCT staff and if verified, would then be put to the “committee” for approval or denial. He did say that the committee meets a few times a month. Once approved, then plastic card license printed and mailed.
Here’s one issue he had. His current extension expires in May because that’s when his 3rd 2yr waiver expires. So the officer said that he could apply for another 2yr (which would be his 4th) just in case the permanent license wasn’t ready by then. My friend said that he has already had 3 waivers and the officer said that IF his 5 yr license wasn’t done before his current extension expires, to come and apply for another 2yr, but to be sure to inform the TCT staff that he has an application in process for a permanent 5yr and that he could get a 4th waiver because his 5yr license wasn’t ready - but that he had filed the application already.
At the end, he didn’t get any paperwork or receipt to prove he applied for a 5yr and unlike the 2yr waiver, he didn’t get any “return to get your letter” type receipt either.
All in all, it wasn’t a bad experience as I could tell. The accepting officer spoke quite good English and explained most steps of the process as he did them. A few of the earlier foreigners who I saw turned away appeared to have photo problems (wrong size), didn’t pay the fee earlier (can’t pay at the TCT itself) or was missing some papers. It appears that unlike Labour who I’ve seen accept an incomplete application pending you bringing in those missing/incorrect papers at a later time before final approval, TCT won’t accept an incomplete application or “pending” paperwork.
Hope this helps someone else applying.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
- 2
- 1
Private hospitals seek court halt on price controls
in Thailand News
Posted
I agree. I don’t think capping fees from a regulatory basis really fixed the issue per se... I do think requiring clear upfront pricing disclosure is a must .... and also agree that increased, fair competition would be a better long term fix for prices over an artificially imposed regulatory basis.
Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app