dimok

Also russian goverment now crazy nervous to all challenges, because of ukrainian crisis and western sanctions, and try to reply to all chalenges - can we wait an escallation? Dont know about Thailand, but in London russians are the first place property buyers, and Thailand is one of the main russians tourist destinations. Anybody in Thai goverment thought about this? Many tourists also come because of "it was like was". For examle when we lived on Phuket for a year 5 our friends familys visited Thailand as guests just because we lived there on a long stay term. How many ppl came to Thailand after visiting our web site, "following advertisement" i don't know, but much more sure. Tourism is a pyramide and this law is attempt to take off lowest brick.

On what grounds were you living on Phiket for a year? On what ground did you get the extension of stay? Irregardless you would still be more than welcome in Thailand. Unless you are saying you stayed without a permission to stay long time in Thailand, for instance abusing visas or visa exempt entries.

You think I would be allowed to live in Russia, the US or most other countries for a year or longer just because I'd like to and can support myself. Fat chance.

On Phuket we came with 3month tourist visa we get on Penang. Then we got 3 month medical visa, because my wife was pregnant, the rest 5 stamps was in Ranong border runs. Then we left to Bali for a month, an then propably again 2-3 stamps. Border runs is not good idea with a small child of course we prefer to extend them on Phuket, but moving to Malaysia for afew days even 1 time instead of 3 border runs more stress - so we did border runs.

Now we are in Pattaya. We had tickets to Kuala Lumpur where we was going to make 3 month visa in March, but in KL embassy was 100% declinein March. Time to go to Penang we didn;t have because bought tickets just for a couple days. Before us embassy in KL visited our more wealthy friends and got decline, so we even not decide to try to get visa - made just border run to KL - this is the only reason we have stamps not tourist visa now. If not this accident in KL with 100% decline, may be we wasn't worry so much - of course visa, more comfortable then then 3 border runs.

" I'd be prepared to bring copies of airline tickets and proof of sufficient funds though."

Air tickets is stupid thing - everybody know that exist ticket tarifs which allow return tickets. So this is just burecracy - ppl buy tickets, pass the border, and then return it to aircraft company - this visitors filter doesnt work anywhere the world. - stupid waste of time - for everybody.

About sufficient of funds, Well i have on accounts several million bahts, but the question in airport i meet at 15 of May was not suffient funds - it was notice that in my passport i have Cambodia border run and words - don't do this again. Well on 15 May it was words. Whats the next?

Also russian goverment now crazy nervous to all challenges, because of ukrainian crisis and western sanctions, and try to reply to all chalenges - can we wait an escallation? Dont know about Thailand, but in London russians are the first place property buyers, and Thailand is one of the main russians tourist destinations. Anybody in Thai goverment thought about this? Many tourists also come because of "it was like was". For examle when we lived on Phuket for a year 5 our friends familys visited Thailand as guests just because we lived there on a long stay term. How many ppl came to Thailand after visiting our web site, "following advertisement" i don't know, but much more sure. Tourism is a pyramide and this law is attempt to take off lowest brick.

"He said that Russians, South Koreans and Vietnamese in particular are in the spotlight."

Well, i am on spotlight. At the process of relocating, with part of assets in thai baht on account, on the border of signing buying property contracts. Whats then?

It is hard imagine for me that russians earn money in Thailand, while in Moscow wages are triple higher. Well, of course exist ppl who don't need money, but just need to support themselves on the sunny beach. Although i don't know anyone amoung my friends, i assume this. Whats the next? What i need to think and to do? To live on the spotlight each time explainig something to immigration officer or embassy stuff? Thailand is cool, but is it not too much to live on a spotlight just because of your nationality? They need to make fixed requerements, without this strange words - spotlight,.. nationalitys.... Really dont know what to do, prepared to relocation almost for a year((

Well, border and visa runs was stupid thing - because it was burning time and gasoline for free. Stamp and visa extensions better to make in immigration office in any town. But this idea sounds even more ridiculous. What is the difference between border and visa run? Why they decide that it is some kind of filter for illegal workers? Price of 3 border-runs aproximately the same as price of 1 visa run to the neighbour countrys, why at least they decided that illegal workers cant get tourist visa instead of stamp? Or point is that problem with visas in Kuala Lumpur is already started, and finally you willn't be able to get visa in any neighbour country?

What is the next?

And about investment visa - good idea to purchase property in country which massively kicking out tenants.Because genuine tourists mainly lives in hotels. Btw is there any hotel for 10 million baht? In condo lives ppl who stay for a long time and their quantity of course will decrease if things will go this way.

when a company and its assets are sold the land office does not get involved. that also applies if and when the company is dissolved. only after closing down the company the land office joins the party when the new owner transfers the chanote in his name.

The company can't get closed before the land has been transferred to a new owner. You can't close down a company that has assets.

Hello! Can anybody answer on more difficult question - wha will be solution in the case if company made leasehold on person and holding chanot with leasehold. company is abandoned by any reason - for example all shareholders died in one day). So it need to be closed by goverment, because nobody doesn;t support accountant etc, from another side it is holding chanot, and as i know it is impossible to transfer chanot with active leasehold - Land office refuse such transfers.

What will be in this situation. Holder of leasehold is safe?