greenchair

11 hours ago, baansgr said:

Eking out on 40k a single man. Me and three kids live very nicely on 30k a month, and we can even afford to go to Ramayana water park this weekend. Food, utilities just about everything except booze is cheap here.

If I had a dollar for every young lady that said she was pregnant, then faked losing it ,to get someone that she loves back. 

Well, I'd be a millionaire. 

There are worse things. 

Move on now. 

1 hour ago, joebrown said:

I haven't bothered looking at CSILA for at least a year, and before then never shared a post of their's on Facebook. It'll be very interesting should they be targeting farangs for sharing on Facebook. It might be quite entertaining to see how big a hole they can dig for themselves.

The people that shared it are living in Thailand. 

They are most likely thai. 

I really hope this lady comes forward with her dna evidence. It would be too dangerous for her to come to thailand, but at least that would show that an event of sexual nature did in fact accur. 

9 hours ago, cyberfarang said:

So what`s stopping her?

What's stopping her is that after a 1 day investigation by big joke, no court case, and no judgement, bj and the leaders of the island have decided that nothing happened and the case should be closed. Prosecutions against several people have been filed. He and his cronies have threatened to file cases against this 19 year old girl, and she would likely face arrest with no bail if she set foot in Thailand. This is an age old tactic of rich against poor, where the original case is aborted with no trial, followed by several countersuits. The goal is to force the original accuser to drop the case. Sad to say, it works almost every time. 

I have had this done to me and a couple of other thaivisa posters the same. 

Masters of trickery, all of them. 

From what I have read of marital law, foreigners are entitled to use the same law as everyone else even though you cannot own the land. 

If the property is bought at the time of your marriage, even without a will, you are entitled to 50 percent share. The other 50 percent is shared between you and the heirs, so if 2 children then you would be entitled to a third each. At the time of buying the house  (if married)  then by law both signatures are needed so I imagine that information is kept. I am not sure, but I think they can't sell the land without your signature. If you have your marriage certificate and her death certificate, I think you can go to the district office and get a copy of the land titles. 

Then you can take the children to court for them to either buy your share or sell the property. 

It depends greatly on these issues. 

1. You are legally married with a certified marriage certificate. 

2. You bought the property at the time you were married. 

3. Proof that you used your own money or her money that was earned during the marriage and not before the marriage. 

Whose money did she buy them with? ?

Isn't it marital property? 

5 hours ago, prakhonchai nick said:

My man sells all Bowmans pies for 65baht..!

Who's the man? ?

Until they have a proper welfare programme, that provides elderly, single parents, unemployed and various other groups with a livable payment per month , they have to let people work in anyway they can. The jobs of begging, motorcycle drivers and street hawkers is similar to a person receiving a benefit in the west ,albeit they have to get out of bed. 

In the west money is taken from the rich to pay the less fortunate and keep them off the streets. I think the rich should not get everything. Let the people make a living or pay the taxes so they can stay home. 

1.It's a cheap rice cooker. 

It should be non stick Teflon. 

2. Also I add a teaspoon of oil to the rice which helps a lot. 

3. Always fill pot with water half an hour before washing. All the rice will remove easily. 

On 5/6/2018 at 10:35 AM, RBOP said:

"Sexual activity with an HIV positive person poses a negligible risk of transmission where that person is taking HIV treatment as prescribed and has maintained a suppressed viral load based on consecutive tests done every four to six months In cases involving sexual activity between HIV-serodiscordant partners, the risk of HIV transmission is negligible where:  The partner living with HIV takes their treatment consistently, and has a viral load less than 200 copies per ml of blood (i.e., a suppressed viral load) on consecutive tests done every four to six months. o This is true whether a condom is used or not, and regardless of the sexual activity at issue;  Studies found zero transmissions under these conditions, though a statistical risk of 0.00- 0.28 transmissions per 100 person-years could not be ruled out.

 

"Consistent with the relevant SCC jurisprudence, the criminal law should not apply to persons living with HIV who have engaged in sexual activity without disclosing their status if they have maintained a suppressed viral load (i.e., under 200 copies per ml of blood), because the realistic possibility of transmission test is not met in these circumstances. A person living with HIV who takes their treatment as prescribed is acting responsibly." 

 

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/hivnd-vihnd/hivnd-vihnd.pdf

 

Yes, tell that to the hundreds of thousands of new cases every year. Hiv is making huge new comeback. It's a hideous disease and public awareness needs to remain high. If hiv sufferers are stigmatised by that too bad. 

On 5/4/2018 at 2:03 PM, cardinalblue said:

Is not one's disease status under the health privacy act?

 

 

Not if the person is going around deliberately infecting other people. Then it comes under the public safety and information laws. His picture can be on the front page. 

After what allegedly happened to her, she most likely will say thank you for banning a return to thailand. 

On 4/9/2018 at 12:07 PM, geriatrickid said:

This should shut up the contingent that always  bleats about there being no action against Thais. Most of the perps were Thai. 

He has arrested a couple of Thais for renting out 1 16 year old girl, a 13 and 15 year old boys. 

Hardly  a complete investigation. The likelihood that she was the first girl before getting caught is slim. A proper investigation would likely uncover dozens of victims and likely several years younger than 16. As usual big joke races threw like a whirlwind only to move on when the true investigation should begin. Like the rape victim on KT. Goes for a few days, no dna on rocks, no dna in the room therefore no rape occurred. Close the case and prosecute her back.It's ridiculous. 

When he wins the sticthed up election , how is he going to function without section 44 ?

The lady obviously wasn't aware that her underpants could be seen, therefore an innocent transgression. 

The photograph should be aware that taking a picture under the skirt of an unaware unconsenting woman is illegal. Then he posted that picture on social media, violating the computer crime act. 

He is a pervert and should be treated as such. 

Despicable person. 

It amazes me that since his death, not a single person has come forward to accuse him of abuse. 

Which leads me to believe that he was always innocent. I hope he gets many more awards. But I would love to see an exoneration of all the lies that he was accused of. 

Rip Michael. 

So is it an offence to stand in front of a monument and take a photo now. 

I don't see anything offensive about the picture at all. 

OMG. 

Really nothing to worry about when having that mother of laws computer crime act at your disposal Sir.

That's great. 

Punishments to army personal that are a crime under the criminal code should be transparent and a matter of public record. 

What is the punishment for 3 men beating 1 man to unconsciousness? 

20 sit ups? 

13 hours ago, rosst said:

An interesting take on the offence and had he just admitted what happened, I MAY go along with you, but, he tried to bribe and intimidate and lie his way out of it, Bury the bastuard I say. 

Seriously ? he shot 1 black panther and a bird .

Then ate some of the parts with an age old belief that it would increase his virility. 

As for bribing. 

The only people to blame for that are the government officials themselves. One minute they are insisting on bribes and have a standard price list, then they are as pure as the driven snow and look flabergasted that someone offered a bribe. 

The official at my kid school did a big speech about the one that gives the bribe is as guilty as the one that takes it. Followed by we are a government school, we don't accept bribes. 

Half the kids in special programmes paid their way in after that speech. Apparently the lower the test score, the higher the bribe price. No receipts of course. 

When it comes to bribes government officials change like the weather. 

13 hours ago, Lungstib said:

Thats true.

 

"Why don't you go down to jatujak market. His case is a drop in the ocean".  The markets full of black panthers?

 

"I do believe he was set up by the restaurant owner that he met 2 years ago". I dont. He had been before, enjoyed shooting, organised his friends to come. Asked for special permission.

 

"This is nothing to do with the panther". This is all about killing protected wildlife.

 

"He is the director of several important companies and someone wants him out". Maybe, but he got himself into this all on his own choice.

 

"He has been hounded well beyond what he deserved just because he is rich". Rubbish, if he was poor he would be in Jail.

 

"It is a first offence". True, first time he was caught.

 

"He should get a suspended sentence". Why?

I didn't say the market is full of black panthers so stop lying. I said it is full of endangered species being sold under the table.

If you have ever read the criminal code which you obviously haven't. Section 56  says the judge can take into account age, past record, behaviour, occupation,  whether he has been imprisoned before and if he is likely to commit the offence again. After considering all that the judge can give a suspended sentence with conditions such as probation, restitution and such. First offenders in most civilized countries including thailand recieve a suspended sentence. 

It's standard.