JordanJames
-
Posts
34 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by JordanJames
-
-
You should write where in Thailand you are, as it will hard to end them with EMS haaha
Good luck,
Ah sorry, I did put that I would bring them to anyone in Bangkok, but guess I should have also mentioned I'm in Bangkok Thanks!!
I live up near Chatuchak Market, close to Central Ladprao.
Oh and just to add, I'm not one of those annoying people who gets animals and then dumps them as soon as they have to leave Thailand. I've lived here for almost 14 years and always planned on staying, which is why I got them (they're my third pair -- I've had rabbits in Bangkok for 12 years, but my other two pairs died a couple of years ago)......but then an opportunity came up back in Europe for a few years that I can't pass up. Otherwise, I'd still be keeping them.
-
I'm looking for a new loving home for my two rabbits, as I'm leaving Thailand at the end of the month for two or three years so can no longer take care of them, and I really don't want to have them put to sleep.
They are both female, and are a bonded pair, so they need a new home together.
The youngest just turned a year old, and the other one will be two years old next month. I have owned them both since they were eight weeks old, and both are in very very good health.
They are indoor rabbits, so need a home where their new owner will let them stay in the house, and with a reasonable amount of space to play and to run around.
They also have complete run of my apartment, although tend to spend most of their time either underneath the sofa or in their pen , but they do love to be able to run around when they feel like it. They would probably prefer a home without young kids, as they are not used to kids at all and frighten easily, but older kids would probably be okay.
As for food -- they get fed three to four times a day, and while they eat basic rabbit pellets, they also eat a large amount of veggies -- kale, Chinese celery, holy basil, Thai basil, cilantro, lettuce and carrots usually. They also get a piece of banana every couple of days, which they love.
Yes, I am aware they are very spoiled , and I probably treat them better than most people would, but I'd love to find a home for them where they are as well taken care of, as they really are lovely.
Of course, they are free to a good home, and they will come with a month's supply of pellets plus two or three weeks supply of hay, and some fresh veggies. I can also dismantle their pen and let you have that (it's made up of shelving cubes, so you can erect it in any shape or size you want), along with the little chairs etc. that they use while they're in it, if you do not already have somewhere to keep them.
Please let me know if you'd be interested in taking them. I'm more than happy to bring them to you in a taxi if you are in the Bangkok city limits somewhere, so you would not have to schlep to me to get them.
And here's a photo -- they really are very cute and have great little personalities, so I'm really hoping I can find them a lovely home. Thanks!!!
-
Friend just emailed me to say his problem was the Immigration officer inputted the WRONG incoming flight number, which is why his wasn't accepted.
See. Sadly with this system you have to trust the Immigration office at the airport can read your flight info correctly.
That seems odd since the flight number is not a required entry. It dose not have a * beside it. Perhaps they just told him that because it was easier to explain.
I select other because I didn't fly in and the flight number box goes away.
No he says they showed him the flight number they had. Different than the one he had put on his entry form and on his plane ticket. So obviously their mistake. I've even just tried it omitting everything that's not starred and still doesn't work, so the only thing I can think is they have something incorrect in their system as all of my info is completely correct.
-
Friend just emailed me to say his problem was the Immigration officer inputted the WRONG incoming flight number, which is why his wasn't accepted.
See. Sadly with this system you have to trust the Immigration office at the airport can read your flight info correctly.
-
Can't get past the first page either.
Inputted all my info, hit the submit button and all I get is a box popping up saying 'for more info contact immigration'. No reference number given.
I last arrived in the country in October, 2014 so OBVIOUSLY should be in the system. The online system is simply NOT working.
Typical Thailand. Can't even get an online form to work properly.
Oh and not due to report until May 6th, so within the 7 day window. And in Bangkok.
KNEW it was too good to be true to actually be able to do this on line, it being TIT and all.
The is system is certainly working for many people. Just go back a few pages in this topic and you will find posts by people that did successful reports.
Perhaps try again and double check everything is correct that you entered. The important ones appear to be passport number. date of birth and nationality.
Tried everything on 3 different browsers, just to be sure. All info correct, double and triple checked, within the 7 day window, and still not working.
Just talked to a friend, he had same problem. Ended up having to go to Immigration in BKK yesterday and they couldn't tell him why it wasn't working. It should do but it doesn't.
My guess? Someone at Immigration has entered my information incorrectly in their computer system so it's not matching up. Can't see what else it could be, especially as I'm not one of those people who have never left Thailand for 10 years. I've only been back in country for 6 months and just got new visa 3 months ago. It should not be this difficult. But.....it's Thailand. So..... it is.
-
Can't get past the first page either.
Inputted all my info, hit the submit button and all I get is a box popping up saying 'for more info contact immigration'. No reference number given.
I last arrived in the country in October, 2014 so OBVIOUSLY should be in the system. The online system is simply NOT working.
Typical Thailand. Can't even get an online form to work properly.
Oh and not due to report until May 6th, so within the 7 day window. And in Bangkok.
KNEW it was too good to be true to actually be able to do this on line, it being TIT and all.
-
Quick question for US citizen applying for retirement extension (for a friend, not me, and yes, actually for a friend - an elderly gentlemen who is applying the first time and seems a bit confused??)
He's American.
What does he currently need?
Just the letter from the US embassy
2 photos
Copy of passport
Anything else? He seemed to think he might need paperwork saying no criminal record?
And, as far as cost goes?? I've always heard 1,900 baht but, when I checked the Thai Consulate website in the US it's showing $200, which is equivalent of over 6,000 baht.
Can anyone clarify current cost? And, like I said, he IS applying for retirement extension for first time - not sure if that makes any difference, as I've never applied for one.
Any help on absolute particulars needed (as much as can be absolute with Thai immigration) before I send him off to Chang Wattana next week would be gratefully received.
What kind of visa and entry does have now? If he does not have a non immigrant (non-o) visa entry he will have to apply for that that first.
If needs the visa he will need two income affidavits from the embassy. One for the visa application and another for the extension of stay. The fee is 2000 for a non immigrant visa.
The fee for the extension of stay is 1900 baht.
A medical certificate is not required for an extension of stay.
All he will need for the visa and extension applications is copies of his passport photo page, visa, entry/permit to stay stamp, TM6 departure card and original income affidavit,
The $200 is for a OA visa application at the consulate. All extensions if stay cost 1900 baht at immigration.
Tourist visa with about 45 days left on it.
Just spoke to someone else who just got his last month with a tourist visa. Direct change to a non-o at immigration with just one letter? Said definitely did not need two letters???
And sorry, forgot to say thanks Just trying to be very sure about this, as I don't want to send him back to the US embassy for a second letter (and another 50 bucks spent) if he doesn't need one.
All that person got was the first step of getting the "non-o" visa. He still needs to do the 2nd step which is getting the extension of stay which will require another income affidavit.
He can do the change of visa status to get a 90 day non immigrant visa entry at any time now up to the last 15 days of his entry. He will need to complete TM86 form and attach a 4cm X 6cm photo to it and have the passport copies I mentioned before.
Then after 45 days or more he can apply for the extension stay.
Just checked with him.
No, he definitely has his extension of stay. He applied for it the same day he applied for and got the non-o and had it stamped into his passport a week ago. Said did not require a second letter. They used a copy of the letter for the non-o visa, and then the original for the extension based on retirement. Told him his next step is just the 90 day reporting.
-
Just did the retirement extension days ago. They wanted plenty of proof (which I had). I provided bank statements from the usa that showed how much I was withdrawing at the atm each month (I had six months worth). Also showed him my military retirement id card. They wanted the affidavit (had that too)...but that would not be enough, by itself. My problems was that i did not have a copy of the id card for the owner of the house I rented. We were going to have her come in, but they later said..."no problem".
In Bangkok? because that's NOT what I'm hearing from anyone who had this done in Bangkok. (Remember, every immigration office in Thailand is different - Bangkok usually goes by the book)
Nothing more needed than affidavit from US embassy, according to friend who did it last month (about 3 weeks ago).
And I've never heard of anyone being asked for a copy of the ID card for the house they're renting. Not in Bangkok. So, I'm guessing you're not in Bangkok?
It was Udon. And it is not policy. It is just done case by case. In my case, possibly they required a bit more. Possibly because of 4 years of tourist visas and such.
Also....some people may find some "fishing around for possible issues that would be normally overlooked). They can, and will, ask for anything they want...over and above written rules, if they have doubts. They had doubts about my residence...obviously.
Perhaps easy going in Bangkok for everyone else? I am curious to that.
Ah, that makes sense then. Thanks for clarifying.
As far as I know he does have income back up stuff, so should probably tell him to take it just in case. Thanks!
And yes, Bangkok always seems 'easier going' in that they usually go by the 'letter of the law', unless anything looks fishy, at least in my 13 years experience with them (never had a problem or been asked for extra paperwork and don't know anyone without other issues who has).
Thanks again.
- 1
-
Just did the retirement extension days ago. They wanted plenty of proof (which I had). I provided bank statements from the usa that showed how much I was withdrawing at the atm each month (I had six months worth). Also showed him my military retirement id card. They wanted the affidavit (had that too)...but that would not be enough, by itself. My problems was that i did not have a copy of the id card for the owner of the house I rented. We were going to have her come in, but they later said..."no problem".
In Bangkok? because that's NOT what I'm hearing from anyone who had this done in Bangkok. (Remember, every immigration office in Thailand is different - Bangkok usually goes by the book)
Nothing more needed than affidavit from US embassy, according to friend who did it last month (about 3 weeks ago).
And I've never heard of anyone being asked for a copy of the ID card for the house they're renting. Not in Bangkok. So, I'm guessing you're not in Bangkok?
-
Quick question for US citizen applying for retirement extension (for a friend, not me, and yes, actually for a friend - an elderly gentlemen who is applying the first time and seems a bit confused??)
He's American.
What does he currently need?
Just the letter from the US embassy
2 photos
Copy of passport
Anything else? He seemed to think he might need paperwork saying no criminal record?
And, as far as cost goes?? I've always heard 1,900 baht but, when I checked the Thai Consulate website in the US it's showing $200, which is equivalent of over 6,000 baht.
Can anyone clarify current cost? And, like I said, he IS applying for retirement extension for first time - not sure if that makes any difference, as I've never applied for one.
Any help on absolute particulars needed (as much as can be absolute with Thai immigration) before I send him off to Chang Wattana next week would be gratefully received.
What kind of visa and entry does have now? If he does not have a non immigrant (non-o) visa entry he will have to apply for that that first.
If needs the visa he will need two income affidavits from the embassy. One for the visa application and another for the extension of stay. The fee is 2000 for a non immigrant visa.
The fee for the extension of stay is 1900 baht.
A medical certificate is not required for an extension of stay.
All he will need for the visa and extension applications is copies of his passport photo page, visa, entry/permit to stay stamp, TM6 departure card and original income affidavit,
The $200 is for a OA visa application at the consulate. All extensions if stay cost 1900 baht at immigration.
Tourist visa with about 45 days left on it.
Just spoke to someone else who just got his last month with a tourist visa. Direct change to a non-o at immigration with just one letter? Said definitely did not need two letters???
And sorry, forgot to say thanks Just trying to be very sure about this, as I don't want to send him back to the US embassy for a second letter (and another 50 bucks spent) if he doesn't need one.
-
Quick question for US citizen applying for retirement extension (for a friend, not me, and yes, actually for a friend - an elderly gentlemen who is applying the first time and seems a bit confused??)
He's American.
What does he currently need?
Just the letter from the US embassy
2 photos
Copy of passport
Anything else? He seemed to think he might need paperwork saying no criminal record?
And, as far as cost goes?? I've always heard 1,900 baht but, when I checked the Thai Consulate website in the US it's showing $200, which is equivalent of over 6,000 baht.
Can anyone clarify current cost? And, like I said, he IS applying for retirement extension for first time - not sure if that makes any difference, as I've never applied for one.
Any help on absolute particulars needed (as much as can be absolute with Thai immigration) before I send him off to Chang Wattana next week would be gratefully received.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Hahahaha - all you guys supporting the military junta and their new 'visa crackdown' last month. Bet you're not supporting them now.
This is going to KILL the tourist industry. But we all know this. And we all know the junta will be backpedelling in a month when they finally realize all the tourists are going elsewhere.
I left Thailand a month ago. Have no interest in ever going back and am now currently telling everyone who will listen to avoid the place until it's back to a democracy.
The Thai junta are killing the economy with their draconian laws. But...that's to be expected.
Meanwhile, I'm currently in the US enjoying a nice glass of wine after a couple of beers at happy hour (whoops - you won't be enjoying one of those anymore)
Chock Dee. I'm sorry - I can't stop laughing!
- 5
-
ROTFL. There was no 'skirting around the rules'.
I'm a citizen of an EU country so, for me, I can live in any EU country for at least 6 months with no need to do anything. After that, in most countries, I'm required to register and pay taxes.
There you go - you can now return to skirting around the law in your own neck of the woods...
Skirting the law? What? On valid tourist visas, as a tourist, traveling all over Thailand and spending my UK-earned income?
I'll be sure to tell everyone I know when I get back to Europe, DO NOT VISIT THAILAND as apparently tourists are 'skirting the law' in Thailand if they spend more than a couple of days in the country.
Personally, I'm guessing the Thai government would rather have me than so many of the farangs currently in Thailand on 'retirement visas' and 'ED visas' yet illegally teaching here. But, they'll no longer have that option as I'll be spending my hard-earned money in Europe.
But do expect to hear me laughing when the next round of visa clampdowns hits you and you are then one of those 'skirting the law' - ROTFL.
Done here. TV never disappoints me. Nor the farangs that troll the forums.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I can't understand why everyone is saying it is 'illegal' to stay on tourist visas? Then why do they issue triple entry visas that give you the ability to be a tourist for 9 months that have to be used within a certain period of time. If they issue these visas and tell you that you are able to use them how can it be illegal? Do you have to be constantly moving to be a tourist? I've stayed in Thailand for longer as a tourist. I don't work, I am travelling a bit in the country but the majority of the time I stay in one place because I like it. If you are complying with the rules and simply have a visa that the Thai consulate has issued you how are you doing something illegal?
Most countries give you 3 month, 6 months or even 1 year tourist visas. This system is/was about $$$ much $$$$ . Actually what Thai Immigration is doing now is pretty unfair, for many years everyone tells yet it is okay you can do that. They pretend to you what you are doing is okay. Come here stay, spend your money. Visa tours, other foreigners and even immigration officers told you how it is done. Now in just a few weeks they start to clean out these people who build a life here....
I'm a citizen of an EU country so, for me, I can live in any EU country for at least 6 months with no need to do anything. After that, in most countries, I'm required to register and pay taxes.
I have no problem with that and, if Thailand allowed me to do that, I would have done so if I wanted to stay a long time. As they won't, the European country I eventually settle in will be the beneficiary of my income and my taxes. And without having to do any more bloody visa runs :) (I won't even get into the idiocy of Thailand giving you a 6-month tourist visa and then requiring you to leave to get the last 3 months activated).
Oh and Malaysia is another option if I decide to come back to Asia for a while down the road. An immediate 90 days at the airport for free, and another 90 days given at the immigration office within Malaysia with no need to do visa runs to get it. Now there's a country that understands how making it easy for people to visit and travel benefits them. Thailand? It will be decades before they finally get it.
And, on that note, I really do have packing to do. Don't want to leave anything behind by mistake :)
- 5
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>
I can't understand why everyone is saying it is 'illegal' to stay on tourist visas? Then why do they issue triple entry visas that give you the ability to be a tourist for 9 months that have to be used within a certain period of time. If they issue these visas and tell you that you are able to use them how can it be illegal? Do you have to be constantly moving to be a tourist? I've stayed in Thailand for longer as a tourist. I don't work, I am travelling a bit in the country but the majority of the time I stay in one place because I like it. If you are complying with the rules and simply have a visa that the Thai consulate has issued you how are you doing something illegal?
'You are correct in everything you say, but for every honest decent person wanting to do this there are countless undesirables who take advantage of a lax system to live and work illegally in the country. How can immigration and border control tell the difference? Criminals have money too...
As for multiple entry tourist visas I think the idea is you would be travellling around the region and using Thailand as a first and last destination, thus allowing hassle free re-entry at the border - not reside in the country for 90 day intervals, repeatedly doing border hops.
So, while it is technically legal to do it, the fact that you are intent on living in Thailand contradicts the reasons you gave when applying for a tourist visa. A loophole.'
How is it a loophole? There is no rule that says you have to leave the country? It can't be designed for going in and out because they offer 15-30 day visa exemptions that cover that for genuine tourists. If they didn't want it to be used that way there would be a rule that says you need to leave the country within x days and they wouldn't offer extensions.
How can they tell the difference? They can't, which is why people who are genuinely tourists and not working nor criminals are genuinely at a loss to know what to do
This argument has played itself out so many times here...
If you are staying in hotels, touring, eating in restaurants every day then yes, I agree you are a tourist.
If however, you have bought property, own vehicles, and consider this your permanent home - then no, I do not agree you are merely a poor hard done by tourist; you are exploiting a loophole by lying when applying for a tourist visa.
I've always thought you'd have to be nuts to buy any kind of property in Thailand. The country is far too unstable and has been for as long as I've been working here, coming here or here as a tourist. You couldn't pay me to buy anything in Thailand that would prevent me leaving at the drop of a hat. In fact, I'm actually amazed at the farangs that do and have just presumed they have money to burn.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I can't understand why everyone is saying it is 'illegal' to stay on tourist visas? Then why do they issue triple entry visas that give you the ability to be a tourist for 9 months that have to be used within a certain period of time. If they issue these visas and tell you that you are able to use them how can it be illegal? Do you have to be constantly moving to be a tourist? I've stayed in Thailand for longer as a tourist. I don't work, I am travelling a bit in the country but the majority of the time I stay in one place because I like it. If you are complying with the rules and simply have a visa that the Thai consulate has issued you how are you doing something illegal?
It's not illegal. It's just the TV crowd who are desperate to prove it's only those 'abusing the system' who are being targeted.
Wonder what they'll say when it's their turn up at the podium? Where will the support for the military junta's new rules be then?
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
"I have been living here on and off LEGALLY on tourist visas"
A small point - tourist visa does not grant you right of residence - only a non immigrant visa allows stays of longer than 90 days.
Not about to lecture you on visa abuse but if you skirt around the rules knowing fully well you do not comply with regulations then you can hardly cry foul when prevented from re-entering the country...
Both you and your money are very welcome - just choose one of the many legal options available. And please stop complaining about options that do not exist.
Why don't you just buy an elite card as you are so flush? Sounds like 500k is not a lot to you?
ROTFL. There was no 'skirting around the rules'. I AM a legal tourist and I did choose the 'legal option'. Definition - in the country WITH a tourist visa, traveling around Thailand, staying in various hotels and resorts etc for an extended period of time as a tourist. Why is this so difficult for some people to understand? That there are those of us who are under 50 and do have money and don't need to work. That may not apply to you. It does, however, apply to a fair number of us.
And, btw, I have the right visa. I've always had the right visa. A visa that was given to me by 3 different Thai embassies with no questions asked. Why? Because I don't work here or anywhere else and I have plenty of money to support myself as the bank statement I was asked for at one embassy proves.
Besides, there haven't been any rules about back-to-back tourist visas for years, so you can keep going on about a 'not legal' visa as much as you want. The fact is the tourist visas I have had to be in Thailand AS A TOURIST were completely legal. Until the Thai military junta have now decided that from now on they're not.
Hilarious really when you consider the Tourism Authority of Thailand is already saying tourist numbers will be down by several million this year. They're about to fall a lot more.
No worries for me though. In most other countries, people like me are who they want. Those who spend extended periods of time in the country, travel around and spend a lot of money while they're there.
And get the right visa? Which one would that be? The retirement visa I'm not old enough for? Or the ED visa they're now clamping down on and that will allow me to study something I don't want to study? Now those are the dodgy visas.
Like I said, no problem. I'm NOT married to Thailand, so leaving isn't a hassle for me. So, no, not complaining, just commenting before I leave. I do, however, think you will be one of those 'complaining' when the next round of clampdowns start and you're one of those targeted.
Anyway, not going to keep wasting anymore time here. I have packing to do. Good luck to those who aren't affected yet. Don't hold out much hope that will last much longer though. The junta is in power for at least another year.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I'm under retirement age so can't get a retirement visa, have no interest in studying Thai or anything else in Thailand, and I have income coming in from a business I own in the UK (around 200,000 baht a month).
Isn't this what the Elite Card system is for?
Do you pay any tax in Thailand?I don't work here and I'm a tourist so why would I pay tax here? I pay tax in the UK where my income comes from. If the Thai government wanted to give me a long-term visa so I could pay tax here, I'd pay tax here. They don't. So I don't.
And, no, you'd have to be an idiot to spend 500K on an Elite Card as it has little benefit except you're allowed to stay here.
Besides, I like Thailand but there are many other countries I like as much. 500K is close to 2 1/2 months living expenses for me in a more developed country like Spain or Germany, so why waste it on a pointless Elite Card when there are many other countries like Spain or Germany or the whole of the EU that I can spend time in?
Let's face it, the only ones willing to jump through the ever narrowing hoops the military junta is throwing at westerners are those with Thai families or who are desperate to remain in Thailand. I'm not married to a Thai and I'm not desperate to stay in Thailand. Hence.....back to Europe with my money. No problem.
- 6
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
And so it goes on..
The "just get a real visa" crowd must be starting to feel a little less sure of themselves.
Retirement visas are next according to a Thai I know at Thai immigration.
Wonder what the 'get rid of the scumbags' crowd are going to say then when they suddenly can't get a retirement visa anymore?
None of this is surprising though. The last time the military junta were in power the Thai economy was disastrous. Same thing happening again.
The "GET LEGAL" idiots with be culled in one swift swoop when they increase the deposit amount from 800K to 1.5million and require it remain in the Thai Military Bank for full 12 months of the extension.
That's what I'm expecting to see in the next few months. A massive increase in the amount of money needed for a retirement visa, which will eliminate a huge number of people on the ThaiVisa forum.
Personally, I'm glad I'm leaving Thailand over the weekend as it's no longer 'foreigner friendly'. And yes, permanently.
I'm under retirement age so can't get a retirement visa, have no interest in studying Thai or anything else in Thailand, and I have income coming in from a business I own in the UK (around 200,000 baht a month). After I stopped teaching here two years ago when UK business income suddenly went through the roof and I no longer needed to work, I have been living here on and off LEGALLY on tourist visas as I am a tourist (don't work here or anywhere else for that matter).
Now the Thai military junta has decided they don't want people like me and, so obviously, don't want my money either. No problem :) I'm moving back to Europe and plan on living various months of the year in Germany and Spain, as I know for sure they have no problem me living in either place 6 months of the year or bringing in my 5,000 euros a month :)
Bye bye Thailand. It's been nice, but I don't intend to spend any more of my hard earned money in a country this unfriendly to foreigners.
- 21
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
And so it goes on..
The "just get a real visa" crowd must be starting to feel a little less sure of themselves.
Retirement visas are next according to a Thai I know at Thai immigration.
Wonder what the 'get rid of the scumbags' crowd are going to say then when they suddenly can't get a retirement visa anymore?
None of this is surprising though. The last time the military junta were in power the Thai economy was disastrous. Same thing happening again.
- 6
-
They have only been doing ED visas for University studies for some time now in KL. Your school should of known that.
Not true. I know someone who got an ED visa for a language school at KL just last week.
This is new.
I came on to also report this, as a friend who is in KL just emailed me to say his ED visa was turned down too and he's studying at a university in Thailand. Same reason given. Now requires a university degree. No university degree, no ED visa for you.
-
I was in the CM Immigration office yesterday with my Thai wife renewing my annual visa and I had to sign a paper indicating these new rules.
Also there was a farang in there with his Thai wife, a couple of small kids, and what looked to be a couple of possible Thai relatives. I mentioned to my wife that that guy's Thai wife didn't seem to have a very happy face on. My wife mentioned to me that she overheard some of the conversation going on between the Immigration officers and that family. It seems that he overstayed by more than a year and they were going to be deporting him as well as place the 3 year ban on him.
I guess the thought is, be legal or don't get caught.
That has always been the case, which is why it's never a good idea to 'turn yourself in to immigration'. That's because you're still IN the country, possibly without the money for the fine, and dealing with an immigration officer who can basically do whatever he feels like to you - just like he can in any country in the world. Deportation and blacklisting was always a possibility in Thailand if you did this - even 10 years ago.
Instead, the right thing to do, which has always been the right thing, is you simply get to a border or the airport and leave.
Once at a border or at an airport, as long as you have the money to pay the fine and behave politely, you are never likely to face problems under the current system (you will when the ban law goes into effect) as you are obviously leaving and trying to fix the situation you are in. Sure, some borders are not allowing people to leave with overstays and are sending them to Bangkok to fly out, but they're not arresting them or causing any more trouble for them than that.
In my 15 years in Thailand, I have known many many many people who have had overstays, some of several years - one man of 10 years, and only one of them ever had a problem paying the fine, leaving the country, getting the suitable visa and coming back to Thailand.
The one who had a problem? Possibly the nastiest, rudest most obnoxious individual I've ever had the bad luck to meet and who couldn't be polite to anyone if his life depended on it. So, I'm sure he was his normal self when he tried to leave on an overstay at the airport. Sure, they let him leave, but I heard through a friend a few weeks later that he'd been put on a blacklist and wasn't allowed to come back for at least 2 years.
But going to an immigration office while on overstay, and particularly without the money to pay the fine (which could definitely have been the situation with the man you saw) and, yes, you could easily be blacklisted.
- 1
-
LOL, what I think is hilarious is a huge percentage of the people on here are obviously teachers, yet seem to be having problems understanding rudimentary English.
Visa ban not in effect, as I stated this morning after a phone call to Immigration, and that has now officially been confirmed by Thai immigration in a hastily put together notice, as they have obviously read these forums and probably can't believe a group of adults are having this much trouble with this.
According to Thai immigration officials (several of whom have been spoken to by several different people today - some on TV, some not), it wil not go into effect until September as it takes 60 days to approve it, which has been stated all along by a variety of Thai immigration officials (so the person posting about 'get out this weekend' is, yet again, stirring the pot).
And NO it's not retroactive. Seriously people.
If you had an overstay in the past - you paid your fine. Subject closed. It is NOT retroactive, as your 'punishment' for that overstay was the fine.
Honestly. I can't take any more of this. The sheer cluelessness is doing my head in. Good night.
-
^^ Has it been confirmed that the new regulations will come into effect in September?
As far as I'm concerned it has.
After all, who am I going to believe? The nice woman I spoke to this morning at immigration, and the two other people I know who also called immigration today and were told the same thing by two other immigration officials (men, not a woman), as well as the person who posted saying Don Mueang had also just told him the same thing, and the fact that NO official statement has been made about the date the ban goes into effect.
Or...some random rumors on Thai Visa by a bunch of farangs who haven't spoken to anyone at immigration, don't seem to understand there is a 60-day approval wait before this new law can be in effect, and seem to love stirring the pot by spreading misinformation and conjecture.
Hmmmmm. Let me see
On that note. I don't have any more time to waste on this. I know what immigration told me. The friend who has an overstay was also told the same thing (and yes, I actually DO have friends, and one actually DOES have an overstay). For the rest of you. Believe it or not. But I honestly don't see the point in you losing sleep over something that is nothing more than yet another TV rumor.
Bye and good luck with it.
- 2
Need Good Home for 2 Female Rabbits
in Plants, Pets & Vets in Thailand
Posted
Still looking for a good home for my two female rabbits.
They really are lovely, and need someone who loves pets, doesn't mind having indoor rabbits, and will take good care of them.
Please let me know if you're interested as soon as you can, as I'm leaving Bangkok at the end of the month and desperately need a good home for them before I go.