earlinclaifornia

39 minutes ago, retarius said:

I tend to think that the jury has been picked with an eye to conviction. Let's face it, it is simply a political trial, and evidence doesn't matter. We then come to sentencing and then several state and federal appeals. Something tells me that the democrats will live to regret destroying the credibility of the whole legal system dragging these years old issues into partisan courts......two can play at that game. 

Typical MAGA getting destroyed with reality. Tears flowing these days alot from you all! Don't worry there is always 2028!

6 hours ago, thaipo7 said:

TUG - I  know you would have something to say here.  Before I get to educating you.  I have to make a remark on one thing you said.  About the Supreme Court throwing shade Trump's way.  Who is getting all the shade?  Corrupt Joe Biden and his millions from China and Ukraine to every member of his family.  Nothing done.  51 CIA managers siding with Biden saying Hunter's laptop was a Russian Hoax, sweetheart deal to Hunter Biden, 17% of the voters for Biden said that had they known about the laptop they would not have voted for crooked Joe.  Garland sits on Hunter not paying taxes on $3 million earned in Ukraine, letting the Statute of Limitations to expire, Joe Biden not pay his taxes in 2017 setting up two S corporations to keep from paying his Medicare taxes.  20 LLCs set up with million flowing from China where there were no employees, no executive officers, no product produce or sold to the Chinese and Trump may get a little shade from the Supreme Court?  Do you even know the BS you are spreading?  You and the other Leftists.

 

What are some of these underhanded stuff that Trump has done.  I have been over 3 years trying to find out from Biden lovers like you and so far not one person has given an answer on the Left.  Be the first.

 

Disgraceful behavior from Trump?  What the hell is an open border, letting in terrorist from all corners of the world?  Joe lies about everything.  Job created, inflation that he caused is coming down, $1 trillion of new debt every 100 days to keep all the Leftist organizations well funded, pays of school loans when the Supreme Courts says he does not have the authority.  Buy votes which is illegal.  Paid off debts of corrupt Democrat unions and Democrat run cities and states.  The corruption of Biden and his administration are too numerous to list.  Executive orders coming out of his as when ever he finds a new way to harm America.  He has all of Obama's people in his administration and picks the most radical people he can find for the Supreme Court.  He is Obama's third and I pray he does not become the 4th.  He is keeping a Presidential nominee tied up in the courts when he should be out there drawing the crowds that Biden can only dream about.  Trump can only be tried in DC, NY, GA where they know Trump can not get a fair trial.  In DC 95% of the people voted Democrat in 2020.  All the judges from Garland down to the courtrooms are Democrat.  Jack Smith was supposed to be approved by the Senate but the hell with that.  They just put him in a position with unlimited Prosecution powers and you have to balls to say, Trump may get a bit of shade given to him.   Your way off base.

I could not stop laughing reading the first two sentences. Let me go finish I needed this LOL

5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

The common denominator among the trials is the delay tactics used by the Trump attorneys.

 

Perhaps rather than conspiracy theories, you should think about Trump's actual defenses against the charges.

That is all this idiot has is BS hating those not MAGA, he hopes get crushed.

Meaningless ignorant Fox cultist. I hope his misery comes to pass. See his lifeless ranting come November 5th.

Still waiting for the Big to show the Biden  "political persecution" !! 

11 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

Has continued into a politically-motivated trial, yes. Happens when the victim can't be intimidated into silence or capitulation.

 

 

Yup, that's some of what the Biden admin, cronies, and thugs are continuing to try to do, and more, with additional subtleties to add in. And no, I'm not going to get into one your bickering loops, as you'll end in silence only to try a different one. It's a religion. 🙂 

 

 

 

 

Just more for you to add to your denials:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/arizona-grand-jury-indicts-11-232335673.html

18 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

Sad. That's not at all how it works with political persecution. "Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime," Lavrentiy Beria famously said. What wasn't a crime, becomes a crime (with law enacted retroactively if necessary) or is simply alleged to be possibly a crime that'll have to be defended at ruinous cost, possibly (even probably) before biased jurors. Ruination of a career may be threatened:

 

Jay Bratt, the special counsel’s lead prosecutor, allegedly threatened Trump staff member Walt Nauta’s attorney, Stanley Woodward, with sabotaging his judicial nomination to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia if he could not get Nauta to turn on Trump, according to a newly unsealed motion originally filed in June 2023.

     --https://thefederalist.com/2024/04/24/here-are-the-3-most-shocking-discoveries-just-unsealed-in-trump-classified-docs-case/

 

Indictments, to which our more feminine members cling religiously, don't mean a lot, as a good prosecutor can get a ham sandwich indicted. No defense is presented.

 

I'll leave it at that, because you're too naive for this discussion, and it's the usual waste of time attempting to educate.

The political persecution in this case has moved into a criminal trial.

Political persecution can refer to political repression, which is when a state entity controls a citizenry by force for political reasons. This can include:

Fear tactics like torture, extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, and political imprisonment

Restricting civil liberties like freedom of movement, association, speech, and assembly

Internet censorship

Unfair administrative hurdles for registering demonstrations

Ban on political parties

Restricting access to information

Tracking the political opposition

Acts of violence 

1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

And the Daily Wire was just a rehash of the NYTimes article which is paywall.

Shugerman gives the prosecution some benefit of the doubt, writing that they could still “have some latitude to develop their case during trial.”

3 hours ago, Roo Island said:

It's an opinion piece.

The Daily Wire does not claim to be without bias. We’re opinionated, we’re noisy, and we’re having a good time.

removed due to paywall.

2 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

And that presumes that Stormy actually ever saw it.

Maybe the Judge will have Trump come to the bench and settle the argument?

17 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Stupid irrelevant post. One lone wolf madman.

The Trump cult has done a hostile takeover of the entire republican party.

You're beyond the pale -- basically a maga cult bot. Bye.

No cure for the MAGA Cult. The only one move I have seen on here is a couple of them admit Trump is not about to win this election.

3 hours ago, giddyup said:

Watched it until the end, but must admit was pretty bored with it by then.

I'm at ep 4 and it being a true story I had been planning on finishing.

https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2024/04/18/trump-speaks-ny-hush-money-trial-jury-seated-daniel-dale-digvid-lead.cnn

1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Please don't break anything when Trump gets reelected.

Come on even you have to believe in the reality of what a "wild time it will be " LOL

Your hope is he breaks everything, I bet.

6 minutes ago, impulse said:

I don't worry about the polls so much when I see the contrast between Trump's visit to a bodega in NYC and Atlanta Chik-Fil-A and Biden's swing through Pennsylvania.

 

Like night and day.  Even in blue areas like Atlanta and NYC.

 

 

Ah yes the two staged media events captivate you I bet!

3 minutes ago, scorecard said:

Re the jury selection. If enough folks cannot be 'accepted', what's the alternative?

 

I'm assuming that somewhere in the relevant act there would be an alternative - all possibilities covered. 

 

And i'm assuming there is an alternative because i'm believing that the case cannot be simply cancelled because 'no jury'.

You do know it is expected to have the 17 jurors seated Thursday, Friday? The process so far says one in five that were awaiting after dismissing those identified as preducial, say they believe they can serve. The opening arguments will then begin on Monday. That is the current assessment.

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

It was a tough assignment but be honest she hasn't performed well. A lot of that is about people just not liking her though.

What VP has performed well in the past?

1 minute ago, scorecard said:

She has been very quiet since becoming VP.

On the other hand prior she was impressive. 

For the life of me I can not figure why on earth Joe assigned her to resolve the border crises. Seemed like a death sentence. The on going trouble fist started after Reagan!