MarvinKh

On 1/19/2017 at 2:34 AM, shaggy1969 said:

My god man,that image is huge!!!

 

I would say,on the whole it is a good attempt!

 

A couple of things that did catch my eye,were the harshness of the brightness in the waves and also midway down the right hand side of the waves,something went amiss with the stitching,but that would be only to be expected on a fast moving subject,like waves.

 

 

The right side u mentioned wasn't there, i cloned some waves n filled in. It was a sloppy job, need to work on that. Thank for the feedback, I'll try harder or, go smaller :) 

What a horrible way to go. May she RIP. N those two scumbags rot in jail. 

2 minutes ago, optad said:

Very busy with the whites top and bottom. Maybe less is more .. but you have skills i don't.

Thanks for the feedback. I agree with you now then I think about it, less is more. I'd better not get too overboard with stitching n huge megapixels output, I doubt I'd print billboards anyway. 

Thanks for the heads up. Had pretty good deals there and pretty models to shoot. Came home with sore legs and minus a big chunk of my wallet. 

2 hours ago, phuketrichard said:

washed out water, way to over photo shoppped for me

Thanks. I will have to work on it. 

Tony recently did a video on this, and it seems like pretty good editing softwares for free. I have no personal experience with any since I'm on photoshop cc and lightroom on monthly subscription. You can check out the video here

Not so super moon