Jump to content

KETSUDA

Member
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KETSUDA

  1. On 5/11/2017 at 6:58 PM, petermik said:

     

     

    I can only repeat..........tried 91 and 95 on return trips 1,870 kms no difference in fuel economy just both cost more.

    p.s. DavisH "my car ran a bit rough on the first tank of 95 but then it smoothed out" <deleted> how did you know it wasn,t doing damage to the engine? and carry on using it :sad: silly in my humble opinion.

    Again with E20 (Shell/Caltex/Esso) I,m getting 20.3 kms/litre,speed on open roads 110/115 kms/hour,excellent for a car of its size :thumbsup:

    Sorry but you are wrong. Goes completely against engineering science. E20 has a lower octane rating which means it has to burn more to obtain the same power output as 91 or 95 octane so to obtain better mileage is impossible!!! Just ask any engineer.

  2. Drunken accidents are hard to believe sometimes. Seems incredible he could not have wrapped something round his arm his shirt would have done to form some pressure to slow the bleeding until he got help. Many years ago a friend of mine came home very drunk and tripped over a coffee table as he walked through his lounge and fell. He fell in an awkward way he basically sat down right on one of the coffee tables legs. Yes it went right up his anus and killed him.

  3. On 1/18/2017 at 0:38 AM, anotheruser said:

     

    I would say yes, Japanese beef is good and for A5 it costs. However we should keep in mind there are other types of beef where wagyu isn't appropriate. 

     

    I would rate American beef or Scottish above Australian but as Australia is close it is considered the best. In Thailand it probably is.

    American beef is mostly corn fed and loaded with antibiotics. NZ beef is mostly grass fed and antibiotic free. Up to you.

×
×
  • Create New...