CG1 Blue

21 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Was her body harmed, though?

Of course she was harmed. She didn't land on a mattress! 

Why you're trying to justify what that POS did I don't know. Well, actually I could have a guess...

12 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

What I wrote above should be clear. From a 10s video we don't know what actually happened.

I would love to hear his version of what happened before that video and why he did what he did.

Maybe what he did was wrong. Probably what he did was wrong. But maybe he had a good reason.

I saw enough lying women. And I saw very aggressive fighting women. Looking at the press, lots of women ruined the lives of innocent men. Not all women are innocent - that is my point. 

So you think if the woman was a bad person and did something wrong to him, it's ok to violently throw her across the floor like the guy in the video did. 

Wow. You learn a lot about people in these threads. 

7 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I understand retaliation.

Many women want to be equals everywhere. Let them be equal everywhere. 

So let's get this clear. Are you saying if a woman / girl has made you angry, you would throw her across the floor like the guy did in the video? 

2 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

You think really it makes any difference if there died 26.000 or 30.000 civilians? Pathetic.

13.000 Hamas fighters? Really? They all got a sticker on their shirt: I'm a Hamas fighter? 

Man, you're a nuisance with that nonsense. 

It's weekend. Have a drink.😂

It sounds like you've already been on the drink

5 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

You missed the massacre, murdering 30.000 of innocent women and children in Gaza??

Do you have any independently verified proof that 30,000 innocent women and children have been massacred in Gaza? 

Even the Hamas terrorists admit that over 10,000 of the dead were Hamas. Plus of the remaining 20,000 there might just be some adult males. Or do Israeli bombs only kill women and children? 

Exaggerating really weakens your argument. 

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No.

 

I’m stating the possible consequences not the definite consequences.

 

Why would a crowd of 'peaceful' demonstrators possibly attack the Jewish man? 

34 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

It makes sense to stop the guy in his tracks. Avoid a possible altercation. How many in the march are there more as anti Jew than pro Palistine?

 

It's just like football fans being segregated. 

 

It only takes one person or a small majority of idiots to start. 

 

The police took the correct decision. And, yes, I believe if a Muslim tried the same thing during a pro Isreal march, the police would do the same 

What it proves is that the so called pro-Palestine demonstrators are dangerous if they are rubbed up the wrong way.

I don't think the same can be said of the Jews in the UK. 

If a group of protestors are dangerous and intimidating, the police shouldn't placate them, they should remove them. But it's easier to remove the one peaceful guy and turn a blind eye to the intimidating ones. 

If you watched the video you can see the aggressive black guy towards the end talking to the Jewish guy in quite a threatening way. 

10 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That said, had the officer not intervened and the ‘breach of the peace’ he was concerned over had occurred, we’d be reading about something a lot more disturbing than a bit of activist performative grandstanding.

Are you suggesting that the 'peaceful' protesters would have attacked the Jewish man? 

2 minutes ago, billd766 said:

I agree with the first half of your post though I am not so sure about the second part, where the mad mullahs will be unable to resist using their new nuclear weapons.

 

Their military leaders will point out that by using them the mullahs will actually be ensuring their own destruction, that of their country plus that of their Shi'a religion, with no guarantee of the complete destruction of Israel, nor would their be any chance of destroying "the great Satan" that they call the USA.

I'd like this to be true, but the way the Iranian regime has conducted itself over the past few decades I just cant see them acting rationally. 

2 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Before the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was signed under the Obama administration, Iran’s breakout time – or the time it would have taken for Iran to gather enough fissile material to build a weapon – was only two to three months. 

The JCPOA was designed to increase Iran’s breakout time to one year or more. This was achieved by requiring Iran to reduce its stockpile of uranium by 98%, and keep its level of uranium enrichment at 3.67% — significantly below the enrichment level needed to create a bomb.
 

As of now, the situation has changed. Iran’s nuclear program has been advancing. According to estimates from February 2024, Iran can now make weapons-grade uranium (WGU) for seven nuclear weapons in one month.

This is a significant reduction in breakout time compared to the period immediately after the JCPOA was implemented. However, it’s important to note that Iran has not made the political decision to produce nuclear weapons, according to Western and Israeli intelligence.

The Historic Deal that Will Prevent Iran from Acquiring a Nuclear Weapon | The White House (archives.gov)

Iran nuclear deal: What it all means - BBC News

What to Know About Iran’s Nuclear Program: Breakout Time (fdd.org)

An Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear weapons programme is unlikely – here’s why (theconversation.com)

The counter argument being that Iran's extremist regime can never be trusted. A regime that terrorises it's own citizens. 

Lifting sanctions gave the regime more funds to sponsor their proxy warfare in the region, and probably enabled them to continue the development of nukes in secret.

Also the JCPOA 'sunset' clauses meant that Iran would be free to develop nukes at a later date. 

2 hours ago, candide said:

Not really (but maybe not as worse as expected).....

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn02784/

Fact is we're not facing the disaster that many predict (wish for): 

On 5 February, the OECD published updated forecasts for the world economy. The OECD said that global growth was resilient in 2023, with inflation falling faster than expected. Modest global growth is forecast for 2024 and 2025. The OECD forecasts UK GDP to grow by 0.7% in 2024 and by 1.2% in 2025 (unchanged from its previous forecast made in November).

http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN02784/assets/39a3d50a-49be-4a0d-a804-c818cca109a6.png

It won't let me paste the table!! But the UK is well positioned versus Italy, France, Germany and the Eurozone for 2024

18 minutes ago, Chivas said:

 

Dear oh dear utterly....am lost for words !

Referendum won on a pack of lies from the Grifters Johnson Mogg and Co to further enhance their bank balances

 

If the Ref. was re run tomorrow of those that would vote you'd see 90% want an immediate return and only 10% to remain in this catastrophic situation we are currently in

 

Of course unfortunately it will mean adopting the Euro as that was made quite clear when we left but thats a small price to pay

Where did you get that 90% figure from? 

There are some people who might not realise that Covid and two major wars are the things causing the financial crisis, and they might be easily persuaded by remoaners to blame Brexit. 

But I'm sure the majority are smarter than that. 

90% 🤦‍♂️

9 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

As per my last post, I'm in the UK now and REAL inflation is at leat 15% - many prices have doubled since 2020 in line with the amount of money printed from thin air since the flu rebranding of 2020

I'm also in the UK and I agree prices are much higher and people are struggling. The ONS data shows that inflation is slowing and wages are rising, but it'll take a while before the people really feel the benefit. 

I agree with you that the global Covid lockdowns caused massive financial damage that might take decades to recover from. It's amazing that people seem surprised about what happens when you shut down the economy for months and print loads of money. 

19 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

 

They strip out food and energy prices and include things like flat screen TVs to massage the numbers so they look acceptable.

 

By real world (or 1980s inflation measurements) UK inflation is approx 15-20%.

 

They keep that quiet as can't have the peasants demanding 15% pay rises.

Gotta juice those corporate profits.

 

You're thinking of Core CPI which is a different measure. 

Core CPI (excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco) 

https://cy.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/bulletins/consumerpriceinflation/march2024

2 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

 

Source or youre making it up (again).

 

Anyway, how can you tell from your barstool on soi buakhao.

Thjose fumes are obvs doing your brain in.

Here you go. Don't tell your tik tok friends, they'll be upset

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/articles/ukconsumerpriceinflationbasketofgoodsandservices/2024

3 hours ago, Summerinsiam said:

It is very telling that even its most ardent supporters are unable to name one thing that has improved since Brexit, even the ideoloically driven idiots that were responsible for it.

When will you remoaners ever learn. The massive improvement is that we're no longer answerable to a bunch of no names in Brussels. 

The fact that we've fared no worse than other EU countries throughout the disastrous Covid lockdowns and two major wars is a huge bonus!

35 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Right, so some prices have fallen.

 

Recent data is inflation is still above the BOE target of 2% 

 

And those price decreases of yours.

 

Over what period are you measuring the price?

 

 

BoE target inflation rate is 2%, with a 1% max divergence either side, so effectively anywhere between 1% and 3% is acceptable. 

31 minutes ago, BigBruv said:

Do you mean like Israel is doing in Gaza now?

No I don't. I mean if Hamas had the means they would DELIBERATELY wipe all Jews off the map. And all other 'infidels' for that matter. 

That is different from Israel targeting Hamas and killing civilians in the process. 

Neither are good, but the Hamas' mandate and intentions (and despicable actions) should concern you at least as much as the Gaza casualties.