Jump to content

Antonymous

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Antonymous

  1. 2 hours ago, spornb said:

    The sale and purchase agreement was done in the land office, and included only land and buildings, in the narative bit

     

    It did not include what was NOT included

     

    There was no written agreement for us to stay and caretake for three months, YES on my behalf a major mistake

     

    Problem is two danish and one thai are all lying together in unison

     

    In court again yesterday Thai lady as registered owner said they paid 4.0 M for the land and buildings and 4.0m for the non listed F and F

     

    The exhusband says we have no contract to stay for three months I reply they have no contract for the moveable F and F

     

    Her ex husband then said he would release all if we paid back 500,000, I replied blakkmail if in all honesty they had paid 4.0 m for F & F make no sense to sell them back for just over 10% of cost

     

    Now adjourned until dec 5

     

    These two have apparently been involved in similar scams in the past, and had the assistance of the police so we understand

    I don't think you know what a Sale & Purchase Agreement is. You say above that:

     

    "The sale and purchase agreement was done in the land office, and included only land and buildings, in the narative bit"

     

    This is flat out wrong. The S&PA is a contract entered into at the time that an offer is agreed. It sets out, inter alia, the full details of the property for sale, any conditions that apply, the amount of the deposit that has been paid (usually on the date of the S&PA), the final sum to be paid on closure and the expected date of closure (ie the date that the property will be transferred at the land office).

     

    The S&PA is a private contract between seller and buyer and it is not presented at or to the Land Office. The land officers never have to see it. It is often the case, for example, that the actual selling price in the S&PA is higher than the selling price declared to the land office. This is so that transfer fees and taxes will be minimised.

     

    From what you have told us so far, it appears that you never entered into a S&PA.

     

    Then you've said that:

     

    "In court again yesterday Thai lady as registered owner said they paid 4.0 M for the land and buildings and 4.0m for the non listed F and F"

     

    So you sold the property for 8 million baht, right? Before the offer was made, did you mention (better yet write) that the land and buildings were to be sold separately to the F&F? Did you ever agree what proportion of the total selling price would be F&F? Unless you had these important details written into the S&PA the buyer cannot claim to have paid 4 million for the F&F.

     

    My guess is that at the time of the transfer in the land office you all agreed to state a lower selling price of 4 million for the property to avoid paying higher fees and taxes. Is that what happened? If so you lied and had better be careful what you state while in court. If I'm right, I assume that the buyer is using this anomaly to suggest that the other 4 million that they paid must have been for F&F. Of course this is nonsense.

     

    End of the day, you are screwed if you didn't have the nouse to get a proper S&PA drawn up, signed and witnessed at the time you accepted their offer. Taking this to court may end up in a heap of trouble.

     

     

    • Thanks 2
  2. Normally when you sell a house the Sale and Purchase Agreement will state what is included in the sale and what is not. You did have a Sale and Purchase Agreement didn't you?

     

    So check what was stated about the furniture and other belongings in the house. Included in the sale or not? If stated that you would remove certain items then you may still be in your right to do so, even though you have been evicted already.

     

    Within that S&PA you should also have stated clearly your agreement to remain in the property for three months and what responsibilities that would confer on you. Clearly you didn't and that was expressed verbally, which I'm afraid has no legal standing.

     

    If you employed a lawyer or a real estate agent to handle the sale and they did not draw up a proper S&PA, you might have some recourse to sue them, but this is Thailand and your chances may be slim.

  3. 38 minutes ago, david555 said:

    If you are curious to know ...Here a little life expectancy tool ..... 

    Be honest to fil it in , do not cheat yourself ????

     

    Life Expectancy Calculator (johnhancockinsurance.com)

    Thanks for this.

     

    Of course our state of health and life expectancy are critical factors in the decision about when to retire and what to do in retirement.

     

    Plenty of folk seem to be of the opinion that they may kick the bucket sooner than expected and therefore they should live an old life of maximum hedonism, heavy drinking, etc.

     

    I'm the opposite. I want to live as long and as healthy a late life as possible.

     

    When Covid began spreading in Thailand I doubled my efforts to lead a healthy lifestyle, improve my sleep patterns and worked hard on my weight, fitness, blood pressure and cholesterol. I changed my diet and added supplements to boost my immune system. I've been getting regular health check-ups.

     

    So...I just took the test in your link. My life expectancy currently is 88, according to this test.

     

    I took the test again and entered all my metrics as they were 18 months ago. At that time my life expectancy was only 78.

     

    So there you have it. I've apparently added a possible 10 years to my life, with some thanks to the pandemic scare!

     

    Hope that may inspire some of you to make the effort too.

    • Like 1
  4. A big cheer for Chiang Dao, the most beautiful area in Chiang Mai and one of the best in all of Thailand.

     

    From the UNESCO site:

     

    Doi Chiang Dao Biosphere Reserve is located in Chiang Dao District of Chiang Mai Province in Thailand. It is the only region in the country to be covered with sub-alpine vegetation, found also in the Himalayas and in the southern part of China. Many rare, endangered or vulnerable species live in the 85,909.04 ha biosphere reserve, such as the Lar Gibbon (Hylobates lar), leaf monkey (Trachypithecus phayrei), Chinese Goral (Naemorhedus griseus), Tiger (Panthera tigris), or Clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa).

    The landscape abounds with caves formed by the infiltration of rain water through limestone formations. The largest and most important of these is Chiang Dao Cave, from which the biosphere reserve takes its name. The cave is associated with the legend of Chao Luang Chiang Dao, the king of all spirits, who is believed to reside in the towering Doi Chiang Dao mountain; both are revered as sacred places. A Buddhist temple in the Lanna style marks the entrance of the cave. The cave and mountain attract many visitors each year, and a model for visitor impact management was implemented. Ecotourism, birdwatching and stargazing are further local tourist attractions.

    Agriculture using a traditional gravity-based irrigation system called Maung Fai is a notable activity in the site, where local practices and knowledge have been maintained over almost 800 years.
     

    https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-steps-efforts-biodiversity-conservation-designation-20-new-biosphere-reserves

    • Like 2
  5. 39 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

    The majority of us are not "unquestioning." We believe in that science thing. FULL of questions and answers based on facts.

    Since when did ‘science’ become an all knowing God? Since when did ‘science’ become elevated to a position of unquestioning belief and following?

     

    How about the FDA? Do you believe that they follow the ‘science’? If so do you throw scorn at those who question public policy based on FDA approval and directions because they are ‘unbelievers’?

     

    Sadly this is what it has come to.

     

    Let’s look at the FDA for a moment. It is not the bastion of integrity and honesty that we might hope for in a regulating agency and they have a history of making serious blunders in the drugs that they approve, all based on ‘science’ of the day. Here’s a quote from a recent New York Times article that addresses this:

     

    “Since the 1980s, the F.D.A. has been approving more new drugs, at a faster pace, and with fewer and weaker studies to support their safety and effectiveness. The agency has also been faulted for poor oversight of the clinical trials used to decide whether or not a drug is safe.  

     

    Both Donald Trump and President Biden have referred to F.D.A. approval as the “gold standard” of drug safety. It is a pretty tarnished gold.”

     

    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/02/opinion/fda-drug-approval-trust.html

     

    And this. Please read this carefully and then perhaps re-assess your judgement of those who are skeptical:

     

    “Researchers at the Yale School of Medicine found that nearly a third of those approved from 2001 through 2010 had major safety issues years after the medications were made widely available to patients.

     

    Seventy-one of the 222 drugs approved in the first decade of the millennium were withdrawn, required a "black box" warning on side effects or warranted a safety announcement about new risks, Dr. Joseph Ross, an associate professor of medicine at Yale School of Medicine, and colleagues reported in JAMA on Tuesday.”

     

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/05/09/527575055/one-third-of-new-drugs-had-safety-problems-after-fda-approval

    • Confused 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...