Antonymous

This makes no sense at all.

I'm glad that you've said this. There are many people in these forums who were not here at the time, or who simply haven't researched the news, and have got a distorted, one-sided, view of what happened.

Alternatively, the OP's company can indeed sell the house to the buyer while he (the OP) continues to 'own' the company after the transaction. In that case the buyer would own the house outright. Perhaps that's what he wants to do? It is not stated by the OP. And if that is the case, then he would want to pay the money into the company account and to receive proper receipts from the company (not from the OP personally) that the transaction is approved by the company. The OP would have a problem doing that without a company bank account. The OP would also then need to add the proceeds of the transaction to the company P&L, adjust the balance sheet (assets). If he wanted to close the company he'd have to pay the appropriate taxes, etc. None of that would be a burden on the buyer.

Of course the buyer has a bank account. It is the OP's company (the legal owner of the house) that doesn't have a bank account. I don't know how the OP managed to fulfill legal requirements (such as paying employees, maintaining a P&L account, balance sheet, audited annual accounts, etc) without a company bank account, but that's not the issue. If the OP has shares in the company he could in theory sell those shares to the buyer for the price of the house. This would require the minutes of an extraordinary general meeting of the directors/other shareholders of the company to approve this transaction. The buyer would then be saddled with being a shareholder of this shell company. The house would still be on the company balance sheet presumably. If I was the (potential) buyer I wouldn't get involved in such a transaction on any account.

'these items will feel a void one would think'. Sadly these poor items will go to the trash without ever having felt a warm moist void. RIP.

Hard enough to hit only the lower body of a moving target from ground level, but firing from an elevated position, very much harder. The police should not have been firing on protesters from that position, if they had any consideration for not fatally or seriously injuring them. That said, I am saddened to see some of the protesters using violence. This only incites a stronger reaction and it does not endear the Thai public to their cause.

Called ‘Antigonish’ and usually referred to as ‘I met a man who wasn’t there’ is a poem written by William Hughes Mearns in 1899. One of the few I recall verbatim from learning as a child. Yesterday, upon the stair, I met a man who wasn't there He wasn't there again today I wish, I wish he'd go away... When I came home last night at three The man was waiting there for me But when I looked around the hall I couldn't see him there at all! Go away, go away, don't you come back any more! Go away, go away, and please don't slam the door... (slam!) Last night I saw upon the stair A little man who wasn't there He wasn't there again today Oh, how I wish he'd go away...

Longan fruit was first imported to Thailand from China in the 19th century. The Thai name for longan is lamyai. Therefore longan and lamyai are the same fruit.

You could be right. He's a big fella with a killjoy attitude. An anagram of his 20 letter name and title in English 'Dr Pheerayuth Sanugoon' gives: 'Huge proud hater. Annoys' Sums him up I think.