defeedme

wonder what he did to provoke that? didn't deserve to die but probably wasn't 100% innocent.

On 10/4/2017 at 1:18 AM, Artisi said:

No need, the first troll has already posted a pathetic request to bring on the trolls. Weak as piss comment. 

from the lack of responses it appears finally people understand the difference between this clown and a real bad guy. troll on.

I'm not defending him, but I bet most on here thinks this guy is worse than Stephen Craig Paddock ? Now there's a guy all resources should have been used to hunt down. lol bring on the trolls.

14 hours ago, sambum said:

Also - headline from Cambodian Press:-

 

"Convicted sex offender Jackson Matthew Hall in Cambodia using stolen ID of Tyler Doran Smith"

yea I'm sure the Cambodian Press is a very reliable news source lol.

Just now, transam said:

You stated all American women were guilty, then you said well maybe 50% were..You seem to be a bit confused ol' chap about guilt and innocence unless it suits you..

it's a generalization . You probably don't live in America so you wouldn't understand.

15 hours ago, tukkytuktuk said:

Ok found some more

Here are links to a few articles on him:

    http://www.cullmantimes.com/news/cullman-co-sodomy-suspect-arrested-in-limestone/article_75a62a26-25e1-11e5-90d2-cb90ed38df38.html

    http://www.hartselleenquirer.com/2015/04/08/man-charged-with-indecent-exposure-2/

    http://bailbondcity.com/alabama/madison-inmate-HALL/MCSO11JBN001431

interesting all from the same news source and the indecent exposure to a delivery woman is pretty funny. "Sgt. George Silvestri of the Decatur Police Department developed hall as the suspect." 

16 hours ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

It is because it has already moved past that stage, there is just an allegation made against him, he was already formally charged which means that the prosecutor believes they have enough evidence for a conviction, and then there is the fact that he chose to run, that move implies that he did not feel that he had a chance of winning the case, that he felt that he was going to be convicted, so what is actually wrong with going along with the belief of both parties?

ummm, because I'm an American and believe in the American Justice system specifically where you need to be proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt by a jury of your peers. "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law by a jury of one’s peers.”

15 hours ago, nausea said:

For what it's worth, another report. I don't recall seeing it on this thread. Repeats stuff we already know, but maybe fleshes out a few more of the details, for those who still retain an interest:

 

The online myStatesman wrote: “Hall was indicted in November 2014 in Cullman County on charges of first-degree rape and first-degree sodomy, the Cullman Times said. Those charges stem from the alleged sexual assault of his girlfriend’s 5-year-old daughter.”

“His bond on those charges was revoked in April 2015 after he was accused of exposing himself to a delivery woman in Morgan County,” myStatesman reported Hall was freed from jail the following June when he was indicted in Madison County on an aggravated child abuse charge for allegedly hitting a child, reported the Cullman Times.

 

 

the word allegedly was used twice.

On 9/25/2017 at 3:47 AM, Kadilo said:

Yet you are the one defending him. How strange. 

I'm not defending those charges or accusations, I'm defending the fact he has not been convicted and we are not 100% sure beyond a reasonable doubt he was not setup by his X Girlfriend. And if he does get convicted of those heinous charges, then let him rot in hell. Why is this so difficult for people to understand? 

1 minute ago, transam said:

So you have a prob with women but not pedos...........At last a full picture for us all...

American women , you didn't read the whole post.

8 hours ago, Kadilo said:

My compassion lies with his victims and them only. 

IF there are victims - only the trial and conviction will prove that.

On 9/25/2017 at 2:58 AM, Rc2702 said:

How evil US women are? 

If his case was so strong why he skip?

Foolish person whoever you are and the use of word paedophile is the only word that best describes this guy on the basis of the charges which he fled from.

 

It's not done not by a long shot. The news will carry this story until the case is heard and if charges are brought he will enter a prison knowing that justice is served through the courts first and then by his new housemates. It's ok he don't need teeth anymore for his new position.

 

 

so you have no clue how evil US women are? lol I guess you're not from the US. He's 24, probably can't afford a good attorney. You're foolish for calling someone that without a conviction. Obviously since you like to use that word so much it makes me question why.

On 9/25/2017 at 2:58 AM, mydee said:

Yes I agree,he is a vile little troll, but it is very tempting not to answer this illfounded views.

more name calling huh, the moderator already warned you or did you skip that post ?

1 minute ago, AGareth2 said:

it wouldn't go to trial unless there were reports

that's your opinion, could be just interviews with the victim or police reports filed by the X girlfriend.  Regardless, everything will be presented at trial.

3 minutes ago, AGareth2 said:

in the UK there would have to be more evidence of anal rape than a mother's say so

such as hospital reports

so I don't buy your story

those reports will be presented at trial, IF there are any.

2 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

Ah, but these allegations were made by the court in the US and immigration in Thailand, as they are both automatically considered trustworthy there was no police investigation necessary and they skipped straight from 'allegation' to accusation and issued the arrest warrant.  Trials never happen on allegation alone, the allegation is first investigated by the police and if there is evidence then a charge is issued based on what has then become an accusation, and then there is a trial.

correct. So whatever "evidence" they have will be presented at Trial. Evidence can simply be the X Girlfriend making stuff up.

2 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

Legal terms darling, wouldn't expect you to understand, but the former only applies to claims made against someone prior to an investigation, accusations are those that are made after evidence has been seen and charges are to be pressed.

they are similar but accusations have some proof, which can be made up, that's why there's a Trial.

12 hours ago, Rc2702 said:

So whats the deal with this delusional fool because it's like 4500/1 against.  Relative maybe? 

 

What's driving this joker.

 

Perhaps he's a pedo sympathiser. I'm up for pooling resources and removing them via a landfill. I'll happily dig.

 

 

more bullying and use of that word - i don't use that word and anyone that does probably is one. This is over, the trial with a jury will decide his fate. Done. Why does anyone care anymore? People are just making stuff up, saying i'm some sort of sympathizer? NO, the fact is he could have been setup by his AMERICAN X-GIRLFRIEND? Does anyone realize how evil some American Women are? we have no concrete proof he raped anyone. why is this so hard for you people to understand? He even says his lawyer has proof nothing happened. lots of dense people here. And no, i'm not related in any way to this guy, I've just seen too many setups.

16 hours ago, StevieAus said:

In my book raping a six year old ( if it occurred) is as bad as killing a person

well your book is pretty warped if you think rape and murder are even in the same league.

18 hours ago, JRUSA said:

Nooo, I think he proved himself to be a nonce..

19 hours ago, sambum said:

Wrong! He HAS skipped bail - FACT!!!

you still have to be convicted of the crimes he skipped bail for in a court of law !

21 hours ago, moondoggie said:

.Those are only allegations. Remember that!

thank you

21 hours ago, moondoggie said:

Just remember. He is innocent until proven guilty!

thank you

23 hours ago, AGareth2 said:

you don't have to be convicted to be a nonce

wrong :

3 hours ago, Kadilo said:

 

i've never mentioned that word once and anyone that does use that word probably is one. And alot of people here use that word ALOT.