Jump to content

dufusdonald

Member
  • Posts

    179
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dufusdonald

  1. 5 minutes ago, simoh1490 said:

    Do share, we'd love to hear them.

    I already did. It goes back down to 1 million in 2020.  So why would anyone deposit 25 million now only to have to send it all back?  So, the bottom line is why would they change it and really you would rather keep your money in a Thai bank than a US bank?  I have to assume you are Thai then which is fine.  

     

    I have an automatic monthly transfer set up with a Thai bank here for my rent. Just today the landlord sent me an sms where is last month's rent? I was traveling. I was not aware. What happened? Who knows. I had to redo it.  I have had many problems with airlines not accepting the Bangkok Bank Credit card as well. Just saying.

    • Like 2
  2. 5 minutes ago, simoh1490 said:

     

    The DPA has threatened to reduce the amounts of coverage for the past ten years, at the last moment they always leave the amounts as is. But hey, I'm sorry to interrupt your Thai bashing with some facts, that was rude, please continue.

    If stating facts is "Thai bashing" my sincere apologies.  You might wanna read some of the real Thai bashing posts here. The website you gave me states the "facts" which you conveniently left out.

    • Like 2
  3. 6 minutes ago, blackhorse said:

    I don't know any one who lost even 1 baht through a bank shutdown here

    However I do recall financial institutions Going down in the USA sub prime crisis

    Also had brits transfered their cash to thai baht in a thai bank they would be laughing now.

    Your theory is flawed

    What theory are you referring to?  All I stated was that the US banks insure for up to 500K and that no one has ever lost a penny from a closed down US regardless of how much was deposited there.  I would imagine the US government would be the safest place to invest in as many countries do.  

    • Like 1
  4. 6 minutes ago, simoh1490 said:

     

    6 minutes ago, simoh1490 said:

    haha. And it appears to go back down to one million in 2020. Why would that be?  Plus, I could not read what the fine print might say. 

  5. Yes,  of course. I know many. Prior to this month all you needed was the letter from the Consulate. Immigration never asked for verification of income.  

     

    And as someone else stated and as I did in a post a week or so ago most Americans at most get about 45000 baht a month from social security. That leaves you 20K short.

     

    There is the third option that you multiply what  you make in SS times 12, take the total and deduct it from the 800k and deposit that 3 months prior to the expiration of your extension of stay and you are good. 

     

    Of course even if you deposit the 800k you can pull it out the next day.  The whole thing is a joke here. Why you need 3 months prior?  It's a farce.

    • Like 2
  6. The US Consulate still provides the letter BUT Immigration requires proof.  So the letter means nothing in reality. Another epic scam.  And it used to be you could simply show your Social Security being deposited in a US bank.  Now, not so sure.  

     

    You could even have a million bucks cash in a US bank and be refused renewal. Even God cannot understand why he did what he did.  lol

     

    I suspect the Thais want the 800000 baht (27K US) in their banks cause they need the dough. I also suspect they must get a cut from the Consulate for the 1500 baht fee (I heard now it is 2000 baht but not confirmed).

  7. 10 minutes ago, steve73 said:

    As a retired UK expat in Thailand it's unlikely that Mr U has sufficient funds to initiate a case against Mr M.

    So the decision to proceed will be ENTIRELY dependent on the lawyers.  If they think they can win a case on a no win - no fee basis, only then will Mr U need to agree to proceed.  At that stage it may be worth playing a few lawyers off against others (even US vs. UK) to get the team most likely to win and with the highest net payout.

     

    As an aside...

    The headline of this thread is a little confusing and IMO, makes no sense... Did Mr U approach the lawyers, or did the lawyers approach Mr U..  

    ie.   ...says he (was) approached by US, British...... add the "was" and they approached him.

    or   ... says he approached (by) US....  delete the "by" and it was he who approached them..

     

    Perhaps deliberate confusion to generate more forum traffic...?  (What, me cynical?)

    Nah, just poor reporting as with the newspaper that claimed Unsworth played an "integral part in rescuing the kids from the cave". He did not. He is NOT a diver. He made a phone call like any concerned human being. Musk did a whole lot more than this guy did and had a whole lot to lose if they did use the sub and kids died.  And for what? To be abused by a whole lot of couch potato no nothings.

  8. 2 hours ago, surangw said:

    did Mr. Unsworth  slander  Musk's  little sub or his motives ?

     

    Actually both. He attacked Musk saying he did it all for PR which if you have been paying any attention at all I have proven (see link or tweets) was 100% false. And second he said the sub was useless and had no chance to work which is incorrect since it does work but was not used. Then he told him to stick his sub up his ass.

    • Like 2
  9. 4 minutes ago, JLCrab said:

    So by reports and video from BKK, Mr. Unsworth has traveled back to UK presumably to determine his legal options. Stay tuned.

    He couldn't do that with a phone call? Nah, he's just trying to get some mulla outta Musk.  He probably went back for other reasons not known. Maybe an outstanding warrant for an unpaid traffic ticket or something.  Who knows. lol

    • Like 2
  10. I would highly recommend all the bashers here might want to review all of Musk's tweets made back and forth. It appears someone originally sent him a tweet asking for his help. Keep scrolling down and read all the tweets and then I want any sane person here tell me he did it for PR.

     

    I am sure the apologies will start flowing Musk's way. 

     

    Here is the link:  https://twitter.com/elonmusk

    •  

     

    There is a video showing the sub with an individual in it risking his life to show it works.  Dozens of people working their asses off for PR?  

     

    I'd use a derogatory word to describe Unsworth but don't want to get  kicked off here. Clearly he and the the bashers here are j.......

     

  11. 12 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

    "I assume the apologies will be forthcoming from the bashers?

    Why?

    There is a diver who asks for help (understandable and very nice of Musk to help) but it says nothing about requirements needed or that the solution offered is any good in this special circumstances.

    Beyond silly reply. Thai engineers were in contact with Musk engineers. Do your homework

  12. I am surprised that we have not heard from any lawyers here.  I would be quite interested to know the thinking from a lawyer not some num nut here where they think Mr Unsworth would have to file a lawsuit if he chose to.  Twitter home office is in California.  Then again does it matter where Musk was when he made the tweet?  If he was 40k feet in the air what country is that?  

     

    Anyone have any "factual" commentary?  

  13. 1 minute ago, AdamTheFarang said:

    You want us to apologise to Musk!!!!!!!!!! I think you are getting Libel mixed up with Slander not a surprise that you are uneducated but on a site that uses nicknames good luck with that. Now please have a break. No more replies to your boring bait. Ok pal.

    I took it as if you were speaking to me. And no one is forcing anyone here to respond or even be here. It has been mostly me against all the bashers here.  I'll give it a rest when the personal attacks stop.  Searching for holes in the mountain is not an instrumental part of the rescue as the writer stated. Sorry.  And I am still waiting for proof from anyone that Musk did it as a PR stunt. If the Thai divers are upset with you all it must mean you all are uneducated fools for attacking Musk. 

    • Thanks 1
  14. 2 minutes ago, AdamTheFarang said:

    You agree that calling someone a "pedo" is normal behaviour when the man has no complaints against him and is married. He has also said his daughter is very upset. Your bait is not working, please as another has said give the keyboard a rest.

    I did not agree that it was normal behavior to call someone a "pedo" ? On the contrary. Can you show show me a post of mine where I said that?  Where do you get off saying that? That is slanderous.  

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...