.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
2tall
-
Posts
54 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by 2tall
-
-
If you are > 50 years of age, why do this when u can get a retirement visa for 800K THB bank deposit balance?
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
maybe they can ply their spy-junk to gullible thais but the real world got huawei sorted out big time! Their CEO banged up by RCMP trying to flee hong-couver and extradition to US looming! Good on them. She's going down big time.
-
4
-
2
-
who really cares about this bloke and his retarded diatribe. The only thing that matters is MAGA while UK goes into the toilet....39 baht to the pound. Sucks to be in the uk. U can have have this corbyn turnip and mayor "taliban-raghead" knan-ski....555!
Priceless!
-
- Popular Post
7 hours ago, Ozman52 said:"President Donald Trump insisted on Sunday that he never called Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex and the wife of Britain's Prince Harry, "nasty", despite an audio recording of an interview showing he did.
Key points:
Mr Trump said the comment was 'fake news' and demanded an apology from media outlets
The audio recording published by The Sun reveals Mr Trump said "she was nasty"
The comments come ahead of Mr Trump's state visit to the UK this week
The president was discussing Meghan in a recent interview with Britain's The Sun newspaper in the run-up to his state visit to the UK on Monday.
"I never called Meghan Markle 'nasty.' Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold!" Mr Trump tweeted.
Mr Trump, in fact, did use the word "nasty" to describe Meghan when asked about her comments about him during the 2016 campaign."
So much for fake news, and which liar got "caught cold". There is the possibility that he believes his own lies, caused by Alzheimer's disease short term memory loss.
he most certainly DID NOT call her nasty! He said and I quote: "I did not know she was nasty". So he didnt call her nasty even though she is a nasty low life dirt bag!
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
8 hours ago, Somtamnication said:
This beauty knows no bounds with his tongue (and fingers). What a shame, America!!!
ha ha ha...(555)...joke is on YOU....UK!
Sucks to be in uk, lol!
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, cmarshall said:
Not true at all. Mueller and his team indicted the Russians, Manafort, Flynn, Papadopoulous, and rest to a total of 34. Butina and Cohen were indicted by other DoJ prosecutors. Where did you get such an idea?
"....Former Donald Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and his longtime business associate Rick Gates were indicted by a federal grand jury on 12 charges, including conspiracy against the U.S ...."
https://nypost.com/2017/10/27/grand-jury-approves-first-charges-in-mueller-investigation/
-
12 hours ago, cmarshall said:
Mueller will testify even if Nadler has to subpoena him to do so. Beggars belief that he thinks it is up to him to decide when his job is done. Many questions remain to be answered. Did Barr shut down the investigation which ended 2 weeks after Barr took office? Why did Mueller refer Cohen to the Southern District to be charged with perjury before Congress, but not Don Jr., Hope Hicks, or any of the other members of the Trump crime family? Why did he not subpoena Trump? Did Trump or any the others refuse to testify by invoking their Fifth Amendment rights? If so, that should have been reported. The public is entitled to hear all this and more directly from Mueller.
Mueller is mistaken when he claims in his speech that the Constitution prevents him from indicting the president. The Constitution is silent on the question and the DoJ policy was set by the DoJ and can be changed by the DoJ at any time. He could and should have identified Trump as an unindicted co-conspirator as Jaworski did with Nixon.
He apparently failed to investigate Trump's financial involvement with the Russians which is pertinent to Trump's public support for the Russian attack on the election. Mueller was specifically charged with carrying out the counter-intelligence investigate, as distinct from the criminal investigation, but instead turned that over to the FBI. No public report was issued.
Mueller failed to fulfill his obligation to the American people. Nevertheless, his speech yesterday is a pretty clear call for impeachment. I hope the Dems step up quickly to the task at hand.
"...Mueller is mistaken when he claims in his speech that the Constitution prevents him from indicting the president."
Mueller cannot indict anyone or anybody...his scope is limited to investigation only. Only GJ's can issue indictments.
-
I have send an email message requesting costing details for an elite visa, have yet to receive any response from them. I question their veracity.
-
4 minutes ago, yodsak said:
Depends which office you use
what does?
-
be the last ship you ever hit!
-
1
-
-
the 3 stooges puffin out their bird like chests in the above pic put more emphasis on spouting off on how stupid they are with budda alcohol bans than they do for cop killers (red bull cop killer).
What a pathetic bunch.
-
On 5/14/2019 at 8:52 AM, OneMoreFarang said:
Obviously Trump won't listen. He needs a distraction from all his personal failings. And his fox "news" watching supporters will never know that Trump is the problem and not Iran. Iran complied with all the details from the agreement. The USA broke it.
hmmm....u best get on with factual current events before making uninformed statements.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/01/why-trump-extended-iran-nuclear-deal-timing-north-korea/
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
absolute rubbish stats, total fake nonsense reporting. The usual BS ineptness so ingrained in everything thai.
-
3
-
1
-
The Huawei's of china will say ANYTHING to ANYBODY to advance their cause. Lying is not only acceptable it's encouraged in chinese society. Believe NOTHING from these people.
-
2
-
-
A different tack here, but, anyways what are the likely scenario and options for retirement extension renewal if applicant fails to maintain the minimum bank balance of 400,000 Baht? I see this requirement becoming "watered down" significantly and just eliminated soon!
-
I maintain 3 passports (all different countries), one is Thai. Keeping all 3 is simple, no issues.
-
1
-
-
On 3/25/2019 at 9:11 AM, Ahab said:
The full report can never be released due to legal restrictions on grand jury testimony being publicly released. The Attorney General of the USA has pledged to release as much of the report as legally permissible.
Probably get leaked at some point? That would create a mega shit-storm.
-
apply local logic: "this would not have happened if you didn't put a mosque there"
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, Time Traveller said:
The thing is, Income is a very subjective term as is really depends up each countries laws over what is considered income. For example, selling investments in many countries is considered income as the sale of an asset is considered a Taxable event.
The problem is Thailand immigration are morons. The only way effective way to determine someone's income is a copy of their individual tax filing because lying on that has serious legal ramifications. Immigration would save so many headaches and wasted time if they just required every applicant for extension of stay to show their tax returns.
Yes, show the tax return...the one I fudged up...full of make belief or the one that needs to be "certified" by the UK/USA/Au et al embassies that don't do certifications?
-
1
-
-
why is this even news? This dude a shareholder in this website?
-
On 3/9/2019 at 9:23 PM, DrJack54 said:
First of all the following is not made up story. I travel a LOT. Even on your suggestion ...i need to trot off to imm immediately after return. On April 1 I need fly au. I fly back bkk April 23. 7.30pm. April 24, I fly Osaka mid afternoon. etc etc. When the "F" do I take bank book to imm. Most of my year is similar. Retirement does not mean living in boom docks village for the year.
Why the "F" do you need a retirement extension and all the paperwork , reporting , etc if you travel so frequently...throughout the year and remain in the country less than XX (30) days??
-
It appears that possibly this "return date" portion of the document is not part of the actual immigration order but rather an added after thought by policeman joe there... for whatever self serving reasons are under consideration.
Nowhere in the doc does it state any requirements to return to immigration for a bank-book/balance update, only at the end of the doc, outside the rule box, its official nature as part of the amended immigration rule(s) thus is questionable.
-
they just increased it.... with the new rule requiring minimum balance before and now after extensions. Its just another way of increasing the required cash/spending in thailand.
-
every local Thai bank I have used since 1999.
Boeing delayed fix of defective 737 MAX warning light for three years: U.S. lawmakers
in World News
Posted
Oh, I think not.
Why haven't there been more crashes with airlines like SW, United, and numerous other airlines that operate 100's of these aircraft daily, Training, pilot skill, maintenance, etc perhaps?