elmrfudd

January 10, 2020

4 hours ago, Sujo said:

Witnesses to trump asking a foreign govt investigate a political rival. Bolton and pompeo were witness to it. Mulvaney admitted it.

So those witnesses would be a great start.

I would start with the fake whistlblower Eric ciamarella and ICIG Atkinson to see who backdated the forms fraudulently submitted.

Atkinson was senior counsel to John Carlin. Carlin was Obamas NSD chief and chief of staff to Robert Mueller when he was the head of the fbi. Just a coincidence, the left will say of course.

Then we'll start on schiff and his staff to see who is perjuring themselves,if not all of them.

Pucker up ladies.

January 10, 2020

4 minutes ago, samran said:

I think for the chest thumpers, any opinion left of Genghis Khan probably fits that description.

So you are the intellectual standard? In your own mind, I am sure that is a fact.

January 10, 2020

21 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

She OWNS trump

She can't even own a pair of dentures that don't keep slipping. But she does hit the bottle alot.

January 10, 2020

1 minute ago, samran said:

If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck...

If it sounds like a load of s.. t and smells like a load of s.. t.....

January 10, 2020

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

A source that provides lots of evidence.

Whereas the Murdoch media empire is contradicting the experts by way overplaying the role of arson and lying about the supposed cutbacks in controlled burning whereas in fact the opposite is the case..

Bristol, you can't call one side a valid source of evidence just because you agree with it.

You do this constantly. As do most of the leftists. You only believe the NY times and the wapo when it is convenient.

Climate change has nothing to do with this.

Calm down.

January 10, 2020

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

But he didn't blame it on arson did he? And these fires are unprecedented, aren't they?

So now no arson has taken place?

Unprecedented? How would we know what happened thousands of years ago when no one was here to record it?

Get a grip. Climate change hysteria is not a sign of intellectual prowess.

January 10, 2020

3 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Yes, perhaps just "rightwing" would have been a better choice.

How Rupert Murdoch Is Influencing Australia’s Bushfire Debate

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/08/world/australia/fires-murdoch-disinformation.html

Wait, you quoted a left wing source for blaming it on a right wing source.... Can this be any sillier?

Droughts happen, lightning happens. Arson happens. Climate change has nothing to do with it.

Stop making stuff up.

January 10, 2020

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

The 25 Republicans who have announced their retirement at the next election seem keen to surrender what you repeatedly refer to as an election certainty.

Perhaps they know something you would rather not know.

There were even more in 2018, what does that have to do with a second presidential term?

January 10, 2020

20 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

He didn’t come across as a credible and honest man in the press conference. Give him credit for resurrecting Nissan fortune but he seem to think he is indispensable and he can do anything he want.

I found him to provide clear information and he clearly had demonstrated that the Japanese system is woefully corrupt.

The xenophobic history of the country is well known for making sure that outsiders are treated as such.

January 10, 2020

20 hours ago, Tchooptip said:

"a system where the conviction rate is 99.4 pct and I believe the number is far higher for foreigners," he said"

It makes me think of another Asian country that I will not name ????

... but maybe many will have guessed ????

The us govt has 93 percent. If they want to prosecute you, regardless of actual guilt, they will be successful. Perhaps we should be questioning whether the systems of all federal governments are actually fair, or are designed to be successful.

January 10, 2020

It is sadly hilarious to watch the blatantly Virtue signaling leftists in pushing this ridiculous fantasy.

We can only hope that she is the only speaker to lose her position twice.

And she gets better denture adhesive so she can stop that slippage.

January 9, 2020

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

How about bit of self reflection on how US destabilized the region and how about US intervention to help Shah dictatorial absolute rule over Iran and suppressed demand for democracy.

OK, agreed that the past administrations have been disastrously inept. Now a president wants to get out and you still want to moan and deride every single move to feed your ideology.

What is your solution since you are the obvious anointed one that has the answers

January 9, 2020

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

Wonder why they were not investigated. Lack or no evidence?

Really? If you are willing to believe that, I guess that is all that matters then in your world.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

January 9, 2020

7 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Not sure your comment meant for humor but it’s seem amorphous. Congress authorize dispensation of aids not individuals even for Trump. Read the Logan Act and try understand the criminology regarding unauthorized persons negotiating with foreign powers.

Like talking to the Iranians that was done before Obama took office or when Kerry was advising them after he was out of office? Like those examples you mean? Or when Ted Kennedy was going to the Russians to try and make Reagan lose the election.

Do you mean like these examples that were never prosecuted and ignored by the media?

There wouldn't be a double standard in your world would there be?

January 9, 2020

3 hours ago, Tug said:

Everyone sees trump is unstable with no impulse control he will be gone in 2020 imo unless he is allowed to rigg the election

You'll claim it was fixed when you lose, like you have since 2016

January 9, 2020

5 hours ago, jaiyen said:

She is typical Yank, wants everything her way. He should never have been allowed to marry her. She has dragged down the Royal family and is now taking away a decent bloke to be her lap dog. Let them go and never come back. I would love to know what Prince Phillip thinks of her !

He's not a decent bloke. He's a typical spoiled brat progressive stooge. She is a sjw woke joke.

January 9, 2020

7 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

They were official members of the Iraqi government. How much more legitimate could they be?

The pmf is not a legitimate government office. If they want to associate with designated terrorists, perhaps take a separate vehicle next time. I can't find the official list of casualties that list these Iraqi officials, do you have it?

January 9, 2020

2 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Nice try. Trump threatened not to leave Iraq unless the US got paid. So now the US is potentially an occupying power. Good way to rile up the Iraqis and add to the danger to troops stationed there.

And how exactly does Iraq win by paying for that infrastructure? Will the limit on its credit cards be upped?

You seem quite emotionally triggered by this problem. Trump didn't start the mess, Obama did nothing but make it much worse as well as the Washington DC elites. somehow you think the man you hate with such unbridled emotion

Who wants out permanently is the bad guy here. It is truly laughable how you twist everything to the orange man bad routine.

You also seem to think the other Iran backed militia people killed in the attack were somehow legitimate military officials. They were proxies. They helped to kill some isis people with overwhelming air power from the usa. They would and did turn straight back to attacking the us.

January 9, 2020

2 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Given that Trump threatened to keep American troops in Iraq until the Iraqis paid for the infrastructure that the USA had built, it's clear that Trump is utterly clueless.

Well, you are entitled to your opinions and conclusions. It holds nothing in the scheme of things. I would like to think that if they pay up for the things built with us dollars when we leave, everybody wins.

But you keep up the resistance Bristol.

January 9, 2020

24 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

An expected reply from someone who display little erudition nor seek information beyond the realms of Trump’s balderdash.

So your unfounded opinion is somehow the intellectual standard because why exactly? The air up there is quite rarefied.

January 9, 2020

2 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

US can easily annulate Iran in a conventional war and put the world into a tailspin for years. For the sake of humanity, I don’t want to see that happen.

However what I am implying is that Trump has extremely poor thought and decision making process and this is due to his oversized ego and narcissistic personality or some say disorder. He was offered a menu of action to take against Iran but chose the extreme which shocked his aides. He really has no thoughts of an overall strategy and most importantly the consequences. He just bulldozed his thinking through and his close aides don’t have the fortitude to cross him. He didn’t consult the Pentagon nor Congress for an evaluation. He chose the path now he have to bear the responsibility of its consequences by himself. Looks like he chickened up. He will not commit to a war or escalation and will take the easier path of sanctions.

Making stuff up isn't really going to provide any intellectual headway.

You have zero idea what options were presented or available. Or who in the defense dept was putting the options on the table.

Stop making stuff up.

January 9, 2020

12 hours ago, ravip said:

I admire your brevity! I guess you want me to spam this forum with 100's of articles! Do not be emotional, just read and try to understand situations with an OPEN mind. Tunnel vision can be very unhealthy!

Kindly, dont bother to answer this post and I will end it as I dont want to post nonsense repeatedly and bore other readers. Have a pleasant evening, you need it!

Wait, you make a ridiculous claim about the us being the reason behind the majority world's suffering, can't back it up with any real evidence, then you lecture me about understanding and an open mind.

The hypocrisy is overwhelming

January 8, 2020

2 hours ago, androokery said:

In my experience, the people calling for “common sense”’ to prevail in order to simplify complex problems, are usually seriously lacking both common sense and the expertise needed to solve the problems. The fact that you don’t understand the reasons for the process or sympathise with its intentions doesn’t mean it’s pointless. It just means you don’t understand.

In your experience? What would that be precisely?

It is exactly your arrogant condescending tone that turns people away from the "only my theory can be right" attitude of the climate nazi cult.

January 8, 2020

The Japanese do not allow Any foreigners into the business world for any reason in a leadership role.

Xenophobic to an exponentially high level

January 8, 2020

24 minutes ago, ravip said:

Sure, I admit I am not an expert on world economy as much as you. But, sometimes I read a little bit on what REAL experts write about world affairs on this thing called the internet.

Here is just an example (of course you may say this also is nonsense! Article

Yes, ignorance is absolute bliss, I agree. ????

So one article is now your source of knowledge about the ridiculous claims that you have made about misery in the world?

Yes, ignorance is quite a sad thing to watch.

Sign In

Profiles

Forums

Downloads

Posts posted by elmrfudd

How Rupert Murdoch Is Influencing Australia’s Bushfire Debate