elmrfudd

January 10, 2020

4 hours ago, Sujo said:

Witnesses to trump asking a foreign govt investigate a political rival. Bolton and pompeo were witness to it. Mulvaney admitted it.

So those witnesses would be a great start.

I would start with the fake whistlblower Eric ciamarella and ICIG Atkinson to see who backdated the forms fraudulently submitted.

Atkinson was senior counsel to John Carlin. Carlin was Obamas NSD chief and chief of staff to Robert Mueller when he was the head of the fbi. Just a coincidence, the left will say of course.

Then we'll start on schiff and his staff to see who is perjuring themselves,if not all of them.

Pucker up ladies.

January 10, 2020

4 minutes ago, samran said:

I think for the chest thumpers, any opinion left of Genghis Khan probably fits that description.

So you are the intellectual standard? In your own mind, I am sure that is a fact.

January 10, 2020

21 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

She OWNS trump

She can't even own a pair of dentures that don't keep slipping. But she does hit the bottle alot.

January 10, 2020

1 minute ago, samran said:

If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck...

If it sounds like a load of s.. t and smells like a load of s.. t.....

January 10, 2020

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

A source that provides lots of evidence.

Whereas the Murdoch media empire is contradicting the experts by way overplaying the role of arson and lying about the supposed cutbacks in controlled burning whereas in fact the opposite is the case..

Bristol, you can't call one side a valid source of evidence just because you agree with it.

You do this constantly. As do most of the leftists. You only believe the NY times and the wapo when it is convenient.

Climate change has nothing to do with this.

Calm down.

January 10, 2020

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

But he didn't blame it on arson did he? And these fires are unprecedented, aren't they?

So now no arson has taken place?

Unprecedented? How would we know what happened thousands of years ago when no one was here to record it?

Get a grip. Climate change hysteria is not a sign of intellectual prowess.

January 10, 2020

3 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Yes, perhaps just "rightwing" would have been a better choice.

How Rupert Murdoch Is Influencing Australia’s Bushfire Debate

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/08/world/australia/fires-murdoch-disinformation.html

Wait, you quoted a left wing source for blaming it on a right wing source.... Can this be any sillier?

Droughts happen, lightning happens. Arson happens. Climate change has nothing to do with it.

Stop making stuff up.

January 10, 2020

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

The 25 Republicans who have announced their retirement at the next election seem keen to surrender what you repeatedly refer to as an election certainty.

Perhaps they know something you would rather not know.

There were even more in 2018, what does that have to do with a second presidential term?

January 10, 2020

It is sadly hilarious to watch the blatantly Virtue signaling leftists in pushing this ridiculous fantasy.

We can only hope that she is the only speaker to lose her position twice.

And she gets better denture adhesive so she can stop that slippage.

January 9, 2020

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

How about bit of self reflection on how US destabilized the region and how about US intervention to help Shah dictatorial absolute rule over Iran and suppressed demand for democracy.

OK, agreed that the past administrations have been disastrously inept. Now a president wants to get out and you still want to moan and deride every single move to feed your ideology.

What is your solution since you are the obvious anointed one that has the answers

January 9, 2020

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

Wonder why they were not investigated. Lack or no evidence?

Really? If you are willing to believe that, I guess that is all that matters then in your world.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

January 9, 2020

7 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Not sure your comment meant for humor but it’s seem amorphous. Congress authorize dispensation of aids not individuals even for Trump. Read the Logan Act and try understand the criminology regarding unauthorized persons negotiating with foreign powers.

Like talking to the Iranians that was done before Obama took office or when Kerry was advising them after he was out of office? Like those examples you mean? Or when Ted Kennedy was going to the Russians to try and make Reagan lose the election.

Do you mean like these examples that were never prosecuted and ignored by the media?

There wouldn't be a double standard in your world would there be?

January 9, 2020

3 hours ago, Tug said:

Everyone sees trump is unstable with no impulse control he will be gone in 2020 imo unless he is allowed to rigg the election

You'll claim it was fixed when you lose, like you have since 2016

January 8, 2020

2 hours ago, androokery said:

In my experience, the people calling for “common sense”’ to prevail in order to simplify complex problems, are usually seriously lacking both common sense and the expertise needed to solve the problems. The fact that you don’t understand the reasons for the process or sympathise with its intentions doesn’t mean it’s pointless. It just means you don’t understand.

In your experience? What would that be precisely?

It is exactly your arrogant condescending tone that turns people away from the "only my theory can be right" attitude of the climate nazi cult.

January 8, 2020

On 12/31/2019 at 5:14 PM, Barry343 said:

Not sure where you hail from, the East Coast of Australia is 3000km made up of rainforest and National Parks that stretch 200km inland. there are cities and towns cut into these forests the problem is that Australia has been in a drought for the last 5 years and the build-up of dead vegetation that has not been cleared by legislation brought by the Labor and Greens Parties in 2005. Thi9s fire is only a small part of the millions of hectares that has be burning since August 2019.

Very well said sir. The tragic result of the eco nazi attitude.

There has been a media push to blame “climate change” for the devastation (e.g., “Australia is Committing Climate Suicide“). However, several other factors are genuinely responsible for the disaster.

First off, Australians have adopted land management practices that are similar to those implemented by California…and we have covered the Golden State’s numerous, large-scale blazes regularly, including one that trapped me on an interstate in 2014.

It turns out built-up layers of dry eucalyptus twigs and leaves make excellent fuel. A warning given in 2015 seems to have gone unnoticed.

January 8, 2020

7 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I must admit a person of your intelligence defending Trump does baffle me. I can only conclude he appeals to your hip pocket and sense of anarchy. Oh, and the sacred Second Amendment, of course.

Fortunately, you don't get to decide who, what or why someone chooses to support. More importantly, you don't get to determine the intelligence or morals of others who disagree with your opinion.

January 7, 2020

3 minutes ago, simple1 said:

US is the second largest emitter of CO2

https://www.google.com/search?q=usa+co2+emmissions+ranking&oq=usa+co2+emmissions+ranking&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.11862j1j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

The OP also refers to environmental impact investigations being reverted to the remit of the developers which surly will contribute to corrupt practices and comes across as a conflict of interest for trump due to his business interests. In addition trump has reversed a number of other laws to protect the environmental in favour of 'big business' due to his petty and bitter enmity to any laws Obama put in-place for the greater good.

Quite a bit of unfounded rhetoric here. Why is it that we can't build infrastructure using common sense and engineering practices without having to jump through dozens of unnecessary hoops? You are making an assumption that things are done to destroy the environment.

January 7, 2020

3 hours ago, daveAustin said:

I'm far from left and hate it. I defended the bloke when folk got on the hating bandwagon, but he's got it completely wrong here and deserves to be called an idiot for it. Not to generalise, but climate/pollution issue debunkers do tend to be of the a g e d persuasion and, it seems, lacking in the logic/intelligence department. Sad, though, as it'll all end in tears (for the young).

What evidence do you have to back up this opinion that cutting red tape for infrastructure projects will damage future generations? Explain the ridiculous claim that somehow you are more intelligent than those who disagree with your opinions.

January 7, 2020

8 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

In case you weren't aware, climate change impacts don't limit themselves neatly to national borders!

What impacts are you talking about?

January 7, 2020

1 minute ago, Tug said:

I’ve personally been on a project multi billion $ effecting at least 70,000 people daily stopped dead in its tracks because a seagull layed an egg we figured a go around but that bit of stupidity I witnessed with my owne eyes so I agree many of the inveriomental laws are to draconian that beeing said we must find the proper balance that allows us to work and still be proper Costodians of the inverioment another words don’t throw the baby out with the bath water

I do not agree with you about much, but yes, the stupidity behind many of the regulations and their complicit beareuacrats have hindered public works for decades

January 7, 2020

Just now, Dumbastheycome said:

Are people and communities that will be effected toads?

Who said they were going to be effected? Do you really think that they would disregard this for an infrastructure project? How twisted are you?

January 7, 2020

3 minutes ago, Dumbastheycome said:

So now it is open season on what remains of the US environment? A headlong rush into the unregulated rape of assets in corporate capitalist interests ahead of long term impact? In terms of the fundamental ideology the US administration is continuing to inflict not only at home but globally it makes sense...to them !

The ultimate democratic right of the rich and powerful to over ride the preservation of any other rights be that in preservation of the interests of the "little" people in any terms including the probable infliction of environmental hazards to whole communities.

Why is it that there is this blind appeal to achieve a situation of supreme power and wealth in a world where everyone and everything is dead?

Wow, quite a bit of over the top emotional reaction without any actual problems that this will create. This is about getting infrastructure projects moving without being forced by enviro nazis to study for years how it would effect a rodent or a toad. Calm down

January 7, 2020

2 hours ago, stevenl said:

Anything goes as long as it is against those pesky lefties. What is wrong with people, why the full on hatred for other people. That is rhetorical.

Anything goes? Like what? Cutting out the ridiculous red tape? Where is this hatred? Why can't we just use common sense and reality to make infrastructure projects feasible and affordable? Just because we see through the over the top regulatory system does not mean hatred. Where are you getting this?

January 7, 2020

1 minute ago, Mick501 said:

Good to see the president keeping yet another promise and streamlining red tape. Hilarious how it triggers the liberals. Wonder what 8 years of constantly being triggered feels like? Any liberals care to share?

Well said mick. But you see, these libs are much more virtuous and intelligent than those who disagree with them. As you will see in their posts

January 7, 2020

1 minute ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Im am not in California but honesty, respect and integrity are what I do stand for.

I am sure you think that. And yet you put HATE trump supporters in your post. The irony is amazing.

Profiles

Forums

Downloads

Posts posted by elmrfudd

How Rupert Murdoch Is Influencing Australia’s Bushfire Debate