Amma09

2 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Boris could just ignore them, like the Remainers have been ignoring Withdrawal legislation for the last few years.
The HOC is not sitting and a scotchy court means nothing in the real world anyway.


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

Sorry. There is no ignoring the will of the people. 

Why are we even talking about this? I prefer to talk about political issues in our lives. You want to talk about.. kids in the block?

For me you are uninteresting personality. I'm sorry to say so, but it's true. 

2 hours ago, billd766 said:

Naturally you have links and threads to back up your words.

 

If you have none then IMHO your post is bovine excretia.

I'm not going to challenge you. I wish you to question yourself when the time is right. 

12 minutes ago, elliss said:

 Typo error , do you mean Alexandra ? , Post number 2..  I wont grouse about it .

  Welcome back.. 555

   

  

I meant what I said. While I am able to communicate with the great Grouse, I'm not him. 

Unfortunately as he is one good debater who is greatly missed on this forum.

Good discussions require people who are willing to be honest of what they say. Those people are rare.

Just now, Amma09 said:

Now why would any EU based car manufacturer wish UK to stay within EU common market?

 

When UK is out, UK is really out of EU's markets. 

The same applies to services, which are the horse of UK's fortune. 

Why would EU allow UK to keep on spreading it's services to EU, once UK leaves the common market?

Silly thoughts, innit.

Now why would any EU based car manufacturer wish UK to stay within EU common market?

When UK is out, UK is really out of EU's markets. 

Or perhaps it's time to talk about the topic, instead of the people talking about the topic?

Let us stop this nonsense. 

It's actually quite hilarious that his guy Alaxandra Pfeffled, or whatever his real name is, has never won a vote within British parliament. 

If Alexandra is the prime minister, why she is unable to win the votes of the people?

Silly stuff, I know.

Just now, jany123 said:

Are you replying to your own posts?

I guess so. Making the point.

Just now, Amma09 said:

As a real Brit, why have you not never really challenged the people you are discussing with?

 

 

I don't care whether you find faults or not. I care that you do your own search of the people. Just do it. Thanks.

2 hours ago, billd766 said:

Well she is better looking for a start. ????  

As a real Brit, why have you not never really challenged the people you are discussing with?

20 minutes ago, Forethat said:

Because they think most of them "up there" are a bunch of incompetent prats with a Marxist pro-EU agenda which they expect England to finance?

I wonder if this is the official Moscow agenda. I guess it is. 

1 minute ago, baboon said:

Blimey, your English skills have suddenly improved! Now why might that be...?

I don't know what you are talking about Baboon.

Perhaps you don't like my message?

2 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

 

There is no such company and no such poll FAKE NEWS 

 

But there is ComRes and here is their latest poll 

 

Base: All respondents likely to vote and expressing a voting intention (n=1,488)

Con	30%	-1
Lab	29%	+2
LD	17%	-3
Brex	13%	-
Green	4%	+1
SNP	3%	-
UKIP	1%	-
Other	2%	+1

 

(% in second column relate to ComRes/Britain Elects poll on 6^th September 2019)

 

Sorry, but you have already lost your old timer cause. it's now time for youger people to take over.

I think it's rather gracrious that the people, who are brave enough, no longer try to hide.

It's now perfectly OK to say NO TO BREXIT. It's now perfectly ok to say fruck the A50. As we want to stay within the EU. 

Brexit was a bad dream, which is now forgotten. 

2 minutes ago, bartender100 said:

 

 

 

 

These people perhaps..... Latest Rescom poll

 

The EU has showed its true colours over Brexit, anyone would be mad to want to stay in if they did any kind of reseach

Has it, or are you simply lying?

I think you are simply lying. 

6 hours ago, Proboscis said:

I think that Donrald Twerp does not realize that the Bahamas is not some poverty striken country but is actually quite wealthy and well-run and does not have the sort of gang culture and violence that is the root of emigration in certain poor countries. Hence virtually no migrants to the USA.

Both UK and USA are willing to abuse their Common wealth countries. 

But when it comes to the times to pay back, the relationship is "complicated"

Shame on you.

Why is London court against what Scottish high court says?

2 minutes ago, Bruntoid said:

Boris Johnson has been softening his stance by the hour - he knows he is getting constantly outflanked and a no deal Brexit isn’t going to be happening. If at all. 

 

Only one one thing matters to Boris Johnson and that’s Boris Johnson - his need to be in the papers as PM for the next three years will far outrank anything connected to Brexit ! He clearly thought or was ‘advised’ to get up on that big Brexit horse and ride into town full of misplaced bravado and make a name for himself as the people’s hero. Only he’s been made to look a rank amateur with the negotiating skills of a ferret! The EU have walked all over him by not actually doing anything. 

 

Right now he he would give anything to announce that second referendum but needs to find a way to do it without looking even more a pillock. 

 

 

Alexander is a weasel, who can be redirected to any direction, people in power wish him to go. 

50 minutes ago, whitemouse said:

Win what, though? How is leaving biggest economic union a win?

 

The only winner is Russia, weaker EU means stronger Russia. Biggest winner  in long term is China, it is easier to dictate trade terms with individual nations, next to China any European country is tiny and insignificant. 

I agree fully with you. But the brexiteers still think they are the Winners of this mess. 

That's important to notice.

3 minutes ago, whitemouse said:

Great observation! 

 

Also, do brexiteers even remember WHY they wanted to leave EU in the first place? What was the point, other than crashing UK's economy? Remember, all of this was ONLY to get rid of Polish and Romanian laborers? Do you enjoy the 'control' now? Was it worth it? Do brexiteers even realize Islamists do not enter UK from EU, Pakistan is not part of EU nor Schengen. 

 

At this point it seems one side simply wishes to 'win', even if winning means disaster for UK, it is almost like burning  down your own house because you no longer like the wallpaper.

Isn't the whole point of brexit to be a winner?

6 minutes ago, puipuitom said:

Maybe wise to use the same tactic as Nawalny advised his followers in Russia: smart voting. You want for sure a "REMAIN"? Vote for the only party, who will do its utmost for that: LibDem. With the British democratic system the one with the most votes per constituency get the seat, the others nothing, and with 50% +1 of the 650 seats, you have the government.

IF.. the French already 17 Oct do not make an end to all discussions.

Farage is indeed like Russia, his homebase. 

Not an important factor as long as we see the larger picture. Farage, like Russia, likes to present himself as an pivotal point. 

But fortunately we are able to see through them.