Jump to content

rebekkahr

Member
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rebekkahr

  1. Just now, Pattaya Spotter said:

    The crime is engaging in a conspiracy to obtain confidential tax records of another person/entity...whether one succeeded in obtaining them or not. Just as conspiracy to commit fraud or murder are crimes, whether one succeeds or not.

    But according to you the documents could be fake. Just like if one plots to commit fraud or murder against say a fictional character like Betty Crocker, it's probably not a crime. 

  2. 7 minutes ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

    They certainly can...and there is no proof that the records obtained by the Times are in fact Trumps true, correct, and complete returns. If they are, the Times itself has admitted that a crime was committed by the person or entity that disclosed them.

    Really? The Times illegally obtained fake documents? If they're fake, what laws were violated in the obtaining of them? Anyway, Trump is no longer claiming that they're fake. Or, at least, not currently.

    • Like 1
  3. 16 minutes ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

    It's not the duty of "law abiding citizens" in the U.S. to prove their innocence of anything...that privilege is reserved for the people of the People's Republic of China, North Korea, and even some Western European legal regimes. It's very apparent you are no legal or tax expert...and that the only crime that's been committed here is by the person or persons who gave these confidential records to the New York Times (hopefully they will be found and prosecuted (civilly and criminally).

    You're applying the standards of a criminal trial to a matter of public concern. There's a good reason that those safeguards are in place. They're there to protect citizens against the power of the government to fine and imprison them. Not appropriate standards for someone in public office.

    • Like 1
  4. 14 minutes ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

    It's not the duty of "law abiding citizens" in the U.S. to prove their innocence of anything...that privilege is reserved for the people of the People's Republic of China, North Korea, and even some Western European legal regimes. It's very apparent you are no legal or tax expert...and that the only crime that's been committed here is by the person or persons who gave these confidential records to the New York Times (hopefully they will be found and prosecuted (civilly and criminally).

    But Trump claimed those "confidential records" were fake. So what crime are you proposing that they committed?

    • Like 2
  5. On 9/22/2020 at 10:32 AM, Nadia6 said:


    The 3 largest states are all LIBERAL and the most populated thank god there is the electoral college or they would be pushing their liberal agenda on very conservative states who  live the exact opposite of their lives.

    The fact remains it is the States that decide the President not the majority of the majority of the population and it has worked perfectly for 200 odd years for the USA 

    And it will work PERFECTLY again in November when whoever wins will win the Electoral College because nothing else counts.

    Neither in terms of population nor area is that true. California and Texes are the 2 largest states in terms of population and electoral votes. New York and Florida come next and are tied.  Are you claiming that Florida and Texas are liberal? Maybe you should reserve judgement about the USA until you get a little better acquainted with reality there.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...