Pork Pie

Just now, transam said:

The UK treats drug driving the same as drink driving. Road tests are done for either. Drug driving requires a blood test at the station to determine what is still present in your system.

 

Now I would say that is damming proof that drugs, including puff, hang around doing stuff, even in you....????

That wasn't the point being made.

It is an undisputed fact that cannabis stays in your system and can be detected for a long period.

The point that the poster was trying to make was that a person can still be high the morning after smoking.

I am refuting that point, not the length of time that THC can remain detectable.

6 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Here's some but no doubt you'll dismiss it:

 

Varying amounts of THC can remain in a person’s blood system for 1-30 days after use. High levels of THC in the blood the morning after using cannabis may cause a person to still feel high.

 

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/weed-hangover#faq

Did you even read the article.

Did you not see the disclaimer at the start?

Researchers have studied the health effects of cannabis, but they currently know very little about cannabis hangovers.

Medical professionals do not know if using cannabis causes adverse effects the day after using it, and only limited studies reference the occurrence.

So it the study itself admits that 'cannabis hangovers' probably don't exist and that no real tests have been carried out on the subject.

The whole article is an opinion and has no scientific relevance at all.

Do you have any real proof that I can dismiss?

1 minute ago, Olmate said:

Yeah Sherlock, seriously I am, Maybe your  drugged braincells work different Sunday or Monday.? Change of.roster periods are the most dangerous, certainly in FIFO settings.

You do realize that we are talking about weed here and not Heroin, cocaine, alcohol or any of the other dangerous, life wrecking drugs.

Show some proof (any proof) that a cannabis high carries on after a nights sleep.

3 minutes ago, PJ71 said:

pls explain?

 

 

Eeeh, I was asking the poster to explain.

I honestly do not understand why one would purposely disfigure their body, was there a problem with it.

If a man encourages or pays to change their wife's body, to me that indicates that they were unhappy with what they already had.

38 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

This OP is clearly one of the down sides of the legalisation of marijuana... 

 

Each new day is gonna be a whole new rose tinted adventure for the feckless smilers who think they are so special they just have to tell everyone about their day !!!!.... 

 

 

Please don't try offloading him on us tokers, he is not one of ours and we don't want him.

Please group him with the drinkers, they are much more deserving. ????

9 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Nothing will infuriate others more than someone getting it for free

Not me.

What infuriates me the most is those plastic gloves that they used to give out when you entered a Makro.

You can never open the things without taking you mask off to 'blow' them open.

Honestly, 'someone getting it for free' doesn't even come close.

5 minutes ago, sipi said:

I was hoping you'd pick her up. I owe her 50baht and she kept poking me in the ribs.

50 Baht?

Did you sleep with her twice?

8 minutes ago, bob smith said:

did you seem me in the bar then
 

I have never seemed anyone.

You pulled a prostitute out of a bar full of prostitutes.

Wow, you must be so butch.

Looking at the strengths shown on that packet, you would probably get a better high from a coffee shot.

5 minutes ago, Bobbie Davies said:

Perhaps I should say, according to my fiancé and our friends, Hashish is not really available for sale because it is not what they want and takes too much work. Also from what I see of the laws such a purchase could have consequences due to the well publicized information on the stated purposes for the legalization of Marijuana, and during this time of uncertainty of where the actual guidelines are it might be risky, as the criminalization makes personal use legal by default but not by actual legislation. They have created guidelines. The chances of a foreigner falling foul of these guidelines are from my experiences and by advisement of my fiancé and friends higher than upon native Thais. It might be best to make your own hash as it is less likely to bring things falling about your head. Better?

The chances of a foreigner falling foul of these guidelines are from my experiences and by advisement of my fiancé and friends higher than upon native Thais.

Then all of the evidence since the legalization came into effect shows that yourself, your fiance and your Thai friends are very wrong.