VBer

21 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

They are countless. Just a start. 

First article is about 1993. Seriously? 😀

Another ones latest date is 2014 (10 years from now).

Look like you just made it up about  5,000 organized criminal gangs, and just posted some firstly appeared links from google.

Guys, can you explain something to me? I have talked with many UK or European citizens, but I have not see a single person who was happy that state money flowing to the new illegal immigrants. But your governments still doing this, despite of wishes of majority of citizens. You live in democracy, so why not choose the ones who will follow wishes of people (or force the current government to do so)?

6 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Most parts for those Russian planes would have to be made in house, by Russians in Russia. 

That’s not correct. Parts being bought from Boeing or Airbus. Not directly but through third countries, there are always someone who want to make some extra buck. Moreover, Airbus and Boeing do not want for their plane to crash whatever country it belongs, so the safety issues are being fixed directly, just not publicly.

15 hours ago, GinBoy2 said:

Since this was an Airbus, given the currents sanctions, good luck in getting the AOG parts to fix it!

That birdie might be spending a few years in Phuket.

 

The plane keeps flying normally 

Flightradar24

4 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

with your head up your back... you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.

Then have nothing to say about the topic, you should attack your opponent personally, right.

These quotes are from The Guardian. The Guardian is also a Russian propaganda, okay, let it be

I think that you already realize that conscripts are not being sent to war now, but just don't want to admit it 

1 hour ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

just not "legal" doesn't mean that it didn't happen

I will repeat again. Yes, it did happen in the beginning and in the situation of disarray. Its not happening now, moreover, commanders who made these orders are already punished. Can you read "in error"?

1 hour ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

fuelling fears that raw conscripts could now legally be sent into battle.

Can you read this and apply basic logic? That exactly means that currently conscripts are not being send to battle, it's just someone's fears that this could happen.

1 hour ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Try to educate yourself before putting your foot in your mouth... . Russia raises the maximum age of conscription as it seeks to replenish Ukraine forces | Russia | The Guardian

Have you tried to read the article? Maybe its difficult to do at your level, but Its just proves that Im saying. I'll quote from there:

Conscripts cannot legally be deployed to fight outside Russia and were in theory exempted from the September mobilisation – although some conscripts were sent to the front in error.

Yes, at the beginning of there there are been cases when conscripts are sent to frontline because of disarray. But these cases  are investigated and this is not happening anymore. And yes, the title is correct also, many of those who in army signed contract and left to Ukraine, so the amount of personel is decreased and need to be replenished. 

11 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

What rock do you live under?  At least educate yourself to appear half as ignorant... 

Russia conscription laws change, leaving some fearful of Ukraine war call-up

Yeah, what rock you live under? 😀

Conscription was always mandatory, and it's still going on. But the ones who conscripted they serve a normal army training, they not going to Ukraine. Only whose who voluntary sign the contract and getting paid for it are going to war. The total amount of army is above 1milion, while in Ukraine is something around 400k

9 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Sounds as coming from far East. From Putin's Empire?

Kind of😀. She is Ukrainian, having Portuguese passport. 

10 hours ago, borderhopper2005 said:

eescaped to dodge his draft

Going to war with Ukraine is 100% voluntary for more than a year, but such comments still popping at the forum

31 minutes ago, agogohome said:

Because all those eligible are in Thailand?

Because conscription started in September 2022 and finished in November 2022, but still exist in some peoples heads. Since November 2022 only those who volunteered going to war.

50 minutes ago, agogohome said:

avoiding conscription? 

There is no mandatory conscription in Russia for more than a year, but such comments still keep popping in the forum

9 hours ago, Excogitator said:

I wonder what they (russians) are saying about us in their (russian speaking) forums?

Nothing at all. No any discussions about other nationalities, except Thais. Thais are discussed in the way what to expect then hiring them, their social patterns or so. Foreigners from other countries are just  living nearby in parallel universe.

2 hours ago, brianthainess said:

Not many above Russia, do you trust the figures from Russia?

The source of data is WHO. If you have data from more credible source - feel free to provide.

So, countries with higher alcohol consumption, such as Germany are also "alcoholism, is a way of life for them"?

1 hour ago, brianthainess said:

and alcoholism

Here is the link to alcohol consumption by country. Plenty of European countries are above Russia. UK is almost at the par. Wikipedia

17 minutes ago, rexpotter said:

They are not tourists, they are criminals.

Everyone from 20-30 millions is a criminal? 

My guess is Thailands role will be providing quality cannabis. Space research and exploration will be much more deep then. 

7 hours ago, Excogitator said:

Good guys in, bad guys out.

What makes this guy bad?

Isn't it a "normal" scheme to perform a business in Thailand? 

So, all farang-owned business are in danger now? House owning "companies" also? We might witnessing a big raising wave.

186M baht. At least they not needed to work illegally as tour guides or barbers

1 hour ago, MangoKorat said:

Another stupid post by a member feeling entitled to make inaccurate racist comments. Ban needed.

Is the ban regarding racist comment needed there? Aseannow forum link I have not noticed your negative reaction to that post. Or antiracism applied only to certain nationalities?