JosephH

Thank you

Refused, water authority says the house under her name and they don’t care it’s a marriage property however when she tried to cut the electricity they refused and considered it a marriage property

That was his question.. why, even though he provided every evidence that it's a marriage property, the family court refused to allow him to reconnect the water since it's even listed in the law that the marriage property is managed 50/50 by the married couple it doesn't make sense.. the judge himself confirmed to him that it's a marriage property and he can live there so how can he live without water!!!!

Why are you pointing at me? I'm not even interested in going there. My friend has ample resources to sue anyone, including the court, if they fail to uphold the law, so stop making shady suggestions that he should abandon his son and his assets and leave because this game is clearly out in the open.

I value your thorough response. The Thai law is very clear about this matter as long as he has the evidence of the money transactions, so if his wife wasn't able to prove that she had the money to buy this house even from before it means she is lying, but after reading the sections you mentioned, I realized that the house my friend and his wife purchased after eight years of marriage is still a marital property. My friend here has evidence of the money, transactions, photos, and even a voice recording .. so it’s not Sin Suan Tua it’s Sin somros

Being a human or having rights doesn't has to be related to any region at all Justice is not related to any region at all, you just need to take off the racism glasses you wearing you might seeing better

Yeah actually he wish to do so, but his son is belong to him and his money is belong to him unless only criminal fraud would disagree with that i'm sure no one would like to stay in unfair place with no rights that so stupid

So we supposed therefore caution the new victims to avoid falling into this trap, to avoid getting married, to understand the repercussions, and to be aware that no matter how much evidence they have, they will never be able to take their rights, cause that is clearly a crime of fraud!!!

around 5 millions baht in time of buying The custody is a good point though .. and that's what his lawyer is going for.

It's kinda disappointing seeing all those negative replies, Some one has all the evidence and read all the Thai law related to this matter and assure it's his right but yet he can't take his right !!!!!!!! not just that most of replies don't want him to keep fighting for his obvious right ?? that's a big disgrace when no longer there's a hope of justice without feeling a shame on how life and justice turned out when there's no law it's a jungle law

It's not an option, He is seeking justice

so anyone can be a fraud and steal without punishment ?

there's a transaction invoices and bank statement shows the money flow the wife's bank account

Dear fellow members, I would like to share with you a story of a foreigner who has been married in Thailand for 13 years and is facing a difficult situation. He has been sending money to his wife to buy a house, which they got after being married for 8 years. However, when he returned to Thailand late in 2019, his wife started to make up problems for non-sense reasons. He then found out that she filed a case against him accusing him of abusing her and wanting a divorce and full custody of their son, and she denies the house is marriage property, saying it's a gift from her mom. The member hired a lawyer who found out that the wife bought the house under her mom's name for one month, then transferred it to her name to make it look like a gift from her mom. During the court process, he hasn't seen his son for two years now. The first family court judged her with full custody but no divorce, which is weird because custody cannot be judged without divorce. And because there's no divorce, there's no marriage property splitting or mention of it. The wife wasn't satisfied with this and wants to kick the member out of the house. She filed a new case but in the civil court, which the judge there was sarcastic on her and her lawyer because they should go to family court since they are officially married, and the member is not a renting person. However, the wife didn't get enough and cut the water from the house since it's in her name, which is against Thai law. The member has read the Thai law, which says it’s a marriage property even by default. However, he even has all the evidence to prove it, and yet the court is refusing his request to contact the water authority to reconnect the water without her permission, even though this is against the law. The court is clearly taking her side and intransigent. The member is frustrated because it's so clear in the Thai law, yet he can't see his son or have water, and he can't tell how suffering it is. The member is asking for help and advice from anyone who has been in a similar situation. He wants to know what he can do to protect his rights and see his son. He has already hired a lawyer, but it seems like the court is not following the law. Any help or advice would be appreciated. Thank you.