Jump to content

kimothai

Member
  • Posts

    430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

kimothai's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (6/14)

  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Year In
  • 10 Posts
  • First Post
  • 5 Reactions Given

Recent Badges

670

Reputation

  1. I've had same issue with Dell (AIO) losing internet connectivity and also stored passwords disappear. So far, a simple restart has corrected the problem.
  2. No contradiction. If you are in a country illegally, you are a criminal. If Biden had not allowed the massive illegal immigration in the first place then all the ICE action would never have been necessary. Illegal is illegal no matter when a person enters a country ILLEGALLY. What part of that do you fail to understand?
  3. The holes I'm referring to are those associated with this article from the BBC. As far as the time when these illegals entered the USA is another hole in this article. The entry time doesn't matter as much as the fact that they were "criminals" with Gang banger tattoos. No doubt that many people caught up in all this deportation may have been here before Biden took office and they only have Biden to thank for this because of his lack of border control which is the reason for this massive effort by ICE.
  4. The point is that there are holes in this story which allows bias due to lack of facts. This story doesn't even state if they were in the USA legally or illegally. Yes, there are stories of unjustified arrests but let's not for forget that none of this would have been necessary if it wasn't for the lack of border security of the previous "weekend at Bernie's" administration.
  5. This BBC (Lefty biased) News article fails to mention if these Venezuelans were in the USA illegally or not. Most likely criminal illegals since they did get deported. Then, it goes on to say these Venezuelans were falsely accused of being gang members simply because of their gang tattoos. Really? I can only imagine what these guys tried to tell ICE in regard to their tattoos. "Honest Officer, we only got these tattoos because we thought they (tattoos) were a really cool fashion statement, we're not gangbangers". If anybody believes that bs story, I have some prime property I'll sell you in the Florida Everglades. This article doesn't mention the time period that this all happened but may have been during the period when Venezuela refused to take deportees from USA. If that's the case, then they wound up in El Salvadore because their home country abandoned them. This article has way too many holes in it which I suspect was done on purpose to throw shade on Trump which shouldn't surprise anyone since BBC is just the British version of CNN or NBC.
  6. Try doing your own research
  7. Exactly and Trump knew that and didn't want to waste time, but the lefties keep trying to accuse Trump of hiding something. So, Trump petitioned the court to satisfy the lefties who will never be satisfied.
  8. Trump did petition the courts to release Epstein files -particularly grand jury transcripts. Try to keep up or are you just too lazy to do your own research.
  9. I don't have a problem with releasing or not releasing. I think most will be disappointed when they are released (as Trump is attempting to currently do).
  10. Exactly! It's no secret Trump (along with many other people) was friends with Epstein up until 2004. It's public knowledge, just Google it.
  11. I think it would be prudent to just wait to see how this all shakes out. O & OA are valid for one year so those people should be ok. If the "valid for one year" is interpreted as "at the time of application for DL" then the O & OA won't qualify. The problem is that it doesn't say which. Too much room for ambiguity (at this point).
  12. Agree, and thank God we have a President who is willing to enforce the constitution and deport these criminals unlike the previous President who was nothing more than a bad episode of weekend at Bernie's.
  13. The Illegals can request a lawyer, but it is NOT the responsibility of the government to provide one (even if they can't afford one). That's the law. I disagree with making the conditions "country club" like. Make the conditions harsh and word will get out and more people will want to self-deport. Let's not forget who broke the law in the first place. These criminals had every opportunity to avoid detention. They chose this, probably thinking the sanctuary cities or lefty organizations would protect them. They were wrong.
  14. It's what contributes to making Thailand a 3rd world country.
  15. That number depends on your point of view. If you consider breaking into/entering a country illegally a non-criminal offense, then you are correct but if you consider illegal entry a criminal offense then you are wrong. I would venture to say that most of those (72%) are non-violent illegals. Regardless these people have had options to do the right thing at the expense/generosity of the American government and if they chose not to go down that path so it's on them. It's the old proverb - you can lead a horse to water but can't make him drink.
×
×
  • Create New...