Jabberwocky

I guess the Phardy ist over ...

This only makes sense when it was the rabies vaccine. 5 rounds to be expected if she didn't have it previously. I wonder why this (and the costs) aren't mentioned. So you can risk interacting with the monkeys but should know the possible consequences. I did it for years and can confirm that there was only one incident when I pulled back a bag that a monkey had already grabbed, and it attacked. Otherwise they are like dogs and know exactly how not to penetrate your skin while biting teasingly. They might even start grooming you, looking for lice. So they can be gentle, too.

That's not the reason. In Australia it's free since November 23 for over 65 years old. Millions of doses were given. But what is the trend: Overall no decrease, rather increase, even 11-fold after 1st vaccination! Then they claim the second dose is giving protection while every immunologist knows that you acquire protection after having been sick because your T-cells remember. Something is wrong here, esp. because more and more younger people get it.

Ok, than do the math. It is rather unlikely to have overlooked your chickenpox. The question than is: Did you get the chickenpox vaccine? If so, your shingles will rather be mild. About 30 percent of the population will get shingles, of those about 15 percent develop long term pain. That is 5 percent of the population. The equivalent of those who never had the chickenpox vaccine. Interestingly, Shingles has not dropped significantly enough since the introduction of Shingrix in 2017. Vaccination rates increase but infection and side effects do, too, worldwide.

You can't get Shingles if you never had chickenpox. Therefore the vaccine would be useless.Did you ever have chickenpox?

.. and I doubt that you can speed into a crossing when you have dotted lines in front of you that tell you to watch pedestrians.

Hmm. I neither see street signs nor any hint that this is not the main road. Only left before right could make sense but not without knowing the other details. The other guy was most likely still beyond the speed limit. Two other details. 1) The fast black car in the other direction, a hint that this is the main road. 2) The speeding bike seems to drive too far on the right.

From where do you derive that?

Well, then, how can he be at fault, being on the main road while the one crashing into him is speeding?

So what footage have YOU seen? Give us a link, please.

How, if there is footage clearing him?

At 100 km I guess he's dead anyway.

That's fishy. Many ideas come to mind when an insurance claims fraud, one is that he doesn't even have a driver's license, and it won't help that he wasn't driving at that moment. The other is: What "related" costs could be so high? As many of you, I am tired of all those fundraising efforts. And I am tired of lack of journalism and half-baked stories here. Mention the hospital's name, so I can ask there myself what's going on.

I see one guy landing at least 4 punches and another guy not hitting once. Even if the defensive guy rubbed shoulders with him before, he wasn't the one looking for a fight.

So we can buy the alcohol between 2 and 5 p.m. but not drink it outside anymore in the future?