Jump to content

6Hugh_Janus9

Member
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 6Hugh_Janus9

  1. This process is practically unheard of, and it's dismissive to pass it off as just usual practice. 1. Normally, a warrant would have to be issued through a judge with presented probable cause, leading to initial arrest. 2. The charges would be disputed during a hearing with an immigration judge, and if deemed guilty to the charges, they could order to revoke his green card. 3. With no green card, he would then be deported. In this scenario, there is NO warrant, NO charges, and NO immigration judge hearing regarding his charges. His citizenship was revoked without due process by a political figure exercising a decades-old statute that has remained unused in this manner. There will be no due process during the upcoming immigration hearing; the judge does not issue green cards, they only handle charges and can request to revoke citizenship (which was already done). Khalil will just be deported because he has no permanent residency after it was removed *without* due process. It is disingenuous to pass this off as normal, as this case is the first of its kind. It is even more disingenuous to say that he has received due process because he hasn't.
  2. His green card was revoked before facing any form of due process. Immigration law judges normally determine if you broke the law and can then can order to revoke your green card. In this case the immigration law judge would simply be verifying his legal status and deporting him without any form of due process. The only reason he hasn't already been deported is because his lawyer got a NY judge to temporarily pause this deportation. The law is filled with a backlog of rarely used decades old statutes (like the one being used here). This case is a first of its kind and will be disputed. They didn't even have a warrant for his initial arrest...
  3. He is a green-card holder not a visa holder, so as a legal resident it grants him the rights to due process
  4. There could be video footage of a defendant gunning down someone on a clear day, and they would still get a trial before being sent to prison. To arrest and deport someone on words alone with no due process is sickening.
×
×
  • Create New...