Jump to content

CaptainNemo

Member
  • Posts

    277
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CaptainNemo

  1. 11 hours ago, worgeordie said:

    China's debt bomb, I thought China was holding a lot of U.S. debt,

    They are, about $3Tn, but that's a fraction of their total potential debt of $40+Tn.

    That's a lorra lorra socks... I think it's more than half of stock market trade.

    I think the total value of the world's biggest banks is around £25Tn. Scary.

    Quote

    what I don't understand with so many countries in huge debt,who

    is holding all this debt ?, anybody really know?

    That's basically the problem... it's borrowing against the future... (e.g.: future growth, that may or may not happen) and that's where the defaulting/moral hazard comes in... In China they are estimated to have about $6Tn of local government debt, and it's been a way of absorbing debt and sweeping it under the carpet.

    Eventually, someone will ask for their money back, or there'll be no income left to service the debts, and then defaulting starts happening, and that can be contagious as confidence falls like dominos.

     

    When debts that are held with the expectation they'll be paid off, and companies/organisations/governments start selling off assets to try and fill the holes, then prices start tumbling. Confidence in countries and their currencies falls as growth looks like tumbling, and if it happens in China, you can bet that this forecast will be way off the mark.

    • Thanks 2
  2. On 9/19/2019 at 11:21 AM, Basil B said:

    But there again wonder if Boris will visit another hospital in the near future short of having no visitors present, staff vetted for political views and all patents sedated? 

    Politicians should be banned from hospitals, unless they're bleeding to death, and even then, they should have to join the back of the queue - it would be kind of an incentive to make hospitals function better.

    obviously by removing that "free at the point of use" thing, which is part of the problem.

    On 9/19/2019 at 2:17 PM, DannyCarlton said:

    I think you are mistaking that for the Tory front bench. Johnson and Gove both attended Eton, Oxford and were members of the Bullingdon Club whereas Corbyn left school at 18 and got a job. Never went to university. John McDonnell, went to university (not Oxford) quite late, at 23 after previously training to be a priest.

     

    The MP with the highest net worth is probably Reece-Mogg, another Eton and Oxford toff, who stands to make another fortune if the UK leaves on a no deal Brexit.

     

    If you're going to indulge in extreme right wing rhetoric, at least make some effort to get your facts right.

     

     

    Alright, let's have a look:
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1120937/jeremy-corbyn-net-worth-labour-leader-salary-wages-earn

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/08/23/labours-public-schoolboys-jeremy-corbyn-accused-hypocrisy-calls/

    https://www.newstatesman.com/2018/06/Posh-Boys-How-English-Public-Schools-Ruin-Britain-Robert-Verkaik-Personal-Irreverent-History-Martin-Stephen-Fourth-Education-Revolution-Artificial-Intelligence-Anthony-Seldon-Review

    https://www.leftfutures.org/2013/04/labour-politicians-on-the-rich-list/

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jan/20/labours-new-members-mostly-wealthy-city-dwellers-leaked-report

    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2016/10/who-s-who-labour-shadow-cabinet

    You're right, they're proper working class, aren't they!

    It seems like Labour keeps its Etonites slightly under the radar, just providing funding and campaigning leadership.

     

    Corbyn comes from a non-working-class background, surely his two Es at A-Level are the reason he didn't go to ..., not his middleworking-class principles? no wait up, wikipedia says he went to a polytechnic and dropped out for arguing with his lecturers all the time.

     

    ...bear in mind that if class war is your thing, the MP doing most for your Remain cause, Oliver Letwin, is probably the epitome of everything you despise... go read his bio... will you stick or twist?

     

    On 9/19/2019 at 2:29 PM, tebee said:

     

     

     

    so? it's such a non-story, really.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    • Thanks 1
  3.  

    1 hour ago, Nyezhov said:

    I just am amazed at you dudes freaking out because in a foreign country, where you are a guest, the local folks call you foreigner?

    Who's freaking out? Foreigner in Thai is "ชาวต่างชาติ" or sometimes "คนต่างประเทศ", which is what educated Thais often say. Some even ask you which country you're from. If you came to a European country and everyone kept saying "foreigner" to you in their equivalent way, how would you feel?

  4. 11 hours ago, SheungWan said:

    the loon Brexiteers on the right.

    Wow... that's a lot of loons... I mean, millions... polling and analysis from academics and assorted trainspotters in this field reports the largest part of the electorate favour no deal. They must be wrong, because they're not listening to people like you who know much more than them.

     

    With so many millions of people less intelijunt than you, how do you get them to vote the correct way? i.e.: your way? Should we just not trouble them with confusing things like that, and just help them by voting for them? We don't want to let evil far-right loons to get FTAs with the growing economies of the world.

     

    I mean, some of these silly Leave voters believe they are the centre and Remainers are extremists, just because there's more of them than anyone else! Everyone knows that the Remainers are the centre, because they're clevererer, and their votes are worth twice as much, or something.

    • Confused 1
  5.  

    23 minutes ago, Yinn said:

    MY THRED, my rule.

     

    please,watch the op video BEFORE post comment. This thred not for arguement. Just for learn.

     

    Thankyou. 

    That's not how threads work. This isn't Thai secondary school.

     

    57 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

    I had this debate on T e a k  D o o r once... they had a thread of "beautiful farang women" (naked, of course).

    So I dutifully uploaded some gorgeous black women photos, because I assumed that they are farang too... what a backlash! you can't even be "sexist" without encountering "racism", even of the positive kind.

    That's not a URL, and censoring it is childish.

    • Like 2
  6. 3 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

    Please I would love to see from any of the Brexiters here a proposal for a deal which the majority of the UK citizens would agree to and which is compatible with the EU laws. Does such a deal exist?

    Well, to handle your hedging, espcially the "compatible with EU laws bit", let's look at what the public appear to say:

     

    "Some polls show no deal as the most preferred Brexit option. Others show remaining. It all depends which options respondents are surveyed about and how the question is asked."

    https://fullfact.org/europe/does-public-want-no-deal/

     

    Anthony Wells (IMO a LibDem and pro-EU person), concludes that 44% v 34%  prefer no deal and WTO

    A ComRes poll found a similar result.

    Prof Curtice's analysis of this and other polls

    https://whatukthinks.org/eu/are-voters-ready-to-leave-with-no-deal/

    concludes that the public is polarised between No Deal/WTO and 2nd Referendum, but that No Deal/WTO is the larger of the polarised groups.

     

    So in answer to your question, a simple majority for no deal/wto is consistently there, but the opposition to it is a large and vociferous minority of about a third of the population at best.

    This more or less maps onto the way the referendum was going prior to the politicisation of the Jo Cox murder, where Remain was heading south of 40%, as the less passionate 30% of "swing voters" in the middle responded to Project Fear and moved towards Remain, but not enough. This has been true since about March, as the graph shows:

     

    image.png.a1b0f202e41b6706843067eddbaf4379.png

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  7. 10 minutes ago, Airalee said:

    If you really want to wind them up, look at the Thai next to the person who calls you Farang and say (in Thai)...

     

    ”why does it (mun) call me Farang?  Doesn’t it know the word for foreigner?”

    I'd suggest you're safer referring to yourself as mun so as to mock them more subtly, and playfully, and avoiding an uncomfortable situation.

    • Like 1
  8. 2 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

    Farang is not a word for foreigner only 'white' so how can that not be racist?   they don't call blacks 'farang'

    I had this debate on <URL Automatically Removed> once... they had a thread of "beautiful farang women" (naked, of course).

    So I dutifully uploaded some gorgeous black women photos, because I assumed that they are farang too... what a backlash! you can't even be "sexist" without encountering "racism", even of the positive kind.

  9. 1 minute ago, Nyezhov said:

    I dont really care. Japanese, Chinese, Cambos all have their words for foreigners. I was married to a Japanese girl, I was a gaijin. No biggy. Call me what you want, just dont call me late for dinner.

     

    I like the honorifics Thai folks use towards me: Papa Falang (Respectable Old Foreigner), Falang Baa (Mature Foreiner), Falang Kwaii (LIvely and Active Foreigner), Falang Hia (Clean Foreigner).

    Yes, but did she like it if you called her a nip or a jap? I speak Japanese, and I've once advanced the argument that Jap is just like "farang/bule/gaijin/gwailou" etc..., Japs will go along with it, but whitepeople get offended on their behalf - fortunately, I speak Japanese, so I can switch languages so the dogooding whitefolks don't have to have their virtuesignalling triggered.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  10. 1 hour ago, cmsally said:

    How about "Kaek" ? Do Indians regard that as polite?

    ...and Jaek for Chinese, I believe. Bule in indonesia, I dunno...

     

    It's such a nuisance when people object to the names you call them based on how they look, isn't it.

    I'm sure well-meaning progressives like Mr Trudeau find it a real minefield working out when you can and can't used the word black, or yellow etc... using the word white seems to never be a problem.

     

    The issue is supposedly about "power", and hence because whitemen are inherently evil (and I feel the evil brewing up in my soulless white male carcass almost hourly), so everyone else can call us anything, and it's OK, but heaven forfend if we do it back, even in the mildest, gentlest way.

     

    Whenever Thais do it to me, I mimic them, "ouei falang!" or say "ouei kon Thai!" or "ouei kon see dam" - because they really don't like being called see-dam, but then I add "falang chorp see dam", and all's well.

    • Confused 1
  11. 16 hours ago, peterb17 said:

    As long as you do not require some medical help- things such as blood tests are sent to Bangkok.

    Sure, it's obvious to me that that's what Cambodians prefer to do. Being on the border with Thailand or near an airport with regular flights to Thailand is a consideration for location: Phnom Penh, Siem Reap, Poipet.

    16 hours ago, peterb17 said:

    The political situation there is worse than Thailand 

    I think that's par for the course in all these countries, and part of why they are affordable. Many people go to tropical places for affordable beaches, villas, culture, and yes, access to younger, slimmer, more compliant women, and iffy politics is part of what keeps them affordable, otherwise they'd be like luxury .cations in Caribbean, Mediterranean, or South Pacific. Pretty much every country in Asia has politics we wouldn't tolerate in the west, especially SEAsia, but I guess if you're wise, you design your life there such that you can get out quickly. I like being near a land border or the sea, so that I wouldn't have to rely on airports. You could argue the case for Korea, Taiwan, and Japan, and have concerns about future events between those countries and their neighbours. I hear Taiwan and Japan are very appealing places though.

    16 hours ago, peterb17 said:

    Back to the OP - I think as others have said - it’s peace of mind- sticking to the rules . Yes 800000 is a reasonable amount of money , but it just sits and does not go away. 

    It is less than other comparable places, like Malaysia, require, and I can see the appeal if there's any uncertainty about the rates and the source of income for the income method. Hopefully policy won't change the required deposit amount in future if the country becomes more developed.

    16 hours ago, peterb17 said:

    As a retiree- I have all the time in the world - in a year I spend at most 2 hours a year at immigration- not exactly a huge burden .  

    I don't think the admin itself is the issue. I think it's just the arbitrary nature of the policy (e.g.: 90-day exit and reentry) and the lack of reciprocity with Visa rules (like not being able to work on a spouse visa).

×
×
  • Create New...