Lee4Life

Doesn't "youth" include minors? Doesn't sound legal.

Sorry...but your imagination is overly active. I have lived here eighteen years and eat only local foods, but have to fend off the soi dogs regularly on my walks. I see the locals that ride bicycles have sticks mounted to their bikes because of the dogs, on my walks I can tell there are mean dogs in the houses ahead of me when I see sticks laying along side of the street that the locals use when they walk by the houses the mean dogs are at. Are you going to tell me that the local farmers and villagers in the rural community I live in are being attacked by dogs because they don't eat Thai food?

Thanks to everyone for all of the helpful replies. The wife and I crossed the bridge at NongKhai for a day in Laos on the last day our O/A visa was valid, when we came back in we presented proof of insurance for one more year, and were stamped in for an additional year. We then purchased re-entry permits for the next year also. So we are good to go for another year. We ran into a couple of issues that were sorted out, the first was that the health insurance for our original O/A retirement visas was still valid for one more day and then we also had a new policy that began the next day and extended for one year. When I presented the I/O the two health insurance certificates she said there may be a problem because there were two certificates, but thankfully she called her supervisor and they gave it the go ahead. Then the officer at the re-entry permit counter at the bridge said they could not issue us re-entry permits for one year, only for one day if we were exiting the country. This in spite of the fact that we had purchased one year multiple entry permits there twice before. So we went to the local immigration office and bought the multiple re-entry permits there. So all worked out well in the end.

Nice article to read when I've just eaten a bunch of them, never seen them up here in NongKhai before, and here they were at the super popular Sunday night market, cheap and tasty, no wonder.

I perform a lot of physical labor around our place, and am often repairing equipment or vehicles. I always make sure I am presentable when I go on errands to buy parts or supplies. Back home nobody cares all that much, people just think to themselves, "looks like he's been working on something", but people here take care in their appearance. One day I ran to buy fuel without cleaning up and changing clothes, and three Thai school girls were just parking their motorbike at the pumps. When the driver saw me she wrinkled her nose and said in Thai, "he's so dirty!" As far as smelling like something goes, I have never heard of the locals saying foreigners smell like wet dogs, I have heard it said that they smell like butter...and that certainly wasn't meant as a compliment. In their own language and customs calling someone a dog, or dog face is extremely offensive.

All of that money won't stay in Thailand, unless they are able to manufacture all of the parts needed to assemble trains, such as axles, brakes, engines, and so forth. But I get your point, You seem to be straying from the point of the article as far as your comment about women goes, the reason for train transportation is to get from point A to point B. You take "admiring the scenery" along the way a bit far.

I have had a yellow book here in NongKhai for around twelve years, we had to use a Thai speaker to obtain it and it cost about 7,000 baht as CFCol stated. I will say that it is currently less helpful than I thought it would be. I used it previously to do our TM30's at immigration, now they refuse to accept it, they said the reporting has to be done by a Thai property owner with a blue book. Maybe others can point out where the yellow book has been useful? Is it more useful in areas foreigners are more common?

All points well taken, you guys are great! we have just renewed our insurance and have certificates that show coverage beginning as soon as our current insurance ends, And we will be sure to buy re-entry permits for a full year before we even leave the border, lest we forget.

Using our previous Non-O O/A visa we were stamped in for one more year on the last day our visa was valid, the I/O did not ask for proof that we had renewed our insurance even though we had it. I would say it just depends on the I/O, or maybe point of entry?

The visa is still valid, but only for another month after our entry the day before yesterday. The I/O was questioned by my wife about why we weren't given sixty days, the answer was that the 60 day rule is not in effect yet. We have been staying in Thailand nine months out of every year for eighteen years now. The I/O at the local office our niece took our documents to yesterday told her that they don't see Non O O/A visas much at all anymore because most people who were using them before are now using other visas that allow 90 days at a time and are allowed to be extended twice. She said it requires 800,000 baht in the bank. I'm not sure what they were talking about. If it matters my wife and I are both US citizens, the wife is not Thai.

The entry stamp in our passport obtained at the airport when we first arrived using the e-visa approval letter and insurance documents has the words, "Non-O/A" and "e-Visa" written on it. Sorry if that was confusing. The document you are referring to as "a printed copy of your e-visa" must be the "notice of e-visa approval" that we used on our initial entry I would guess. I haven't seen a document that says that it is the actual e-visa. I guess I get confused by all of the different terms, After being here for eighteen years the whole e-visa deal is hard for me to get used to, getting old I guess.

not contradictory... I didn't list a date our visas expired, or were good until. I simply stated that they were valid when we entered at the airport, and that the local Immigration office advised us to exit across to Laos the final day of the visas and then return the same day, and if we showed insurance coverage for the next year we would be stamped in for one year. why do you need a "valid until date"? The visas were valid for thirty more days when we entered at Savarnabhumi the day before yesterday.

Our intent is to stay for nine months, our usual process is to obtain the Non O/A visa in the States and then on the last day it is valid to cross the border and re-enter, and by doing so be stamped in for an additional year, (O/A visas get stamped in for one year from the date of entry every time), then purchase re-entry permits for that year. In effect it stretches a one year O/A visa to two years. There is not a lot of savings in this method due to the price of the re-entry permits, but it does save the hassle of doing all of the paperwork required for a new visa every year. Looking at our paperwork I can see that the period they stamped us in for matches the expiration of our insurance policy and also the "good until" date of our visa. It could be that there was a miscommunication, the I/O clearly stated that we were given thirty days because we did not have proof of insurance, but it may very well be that the real issue may have been that they couldn't stamp us in for for a longer period of time than our medical insurance was valid for. In any case the local Immigration Office advised us that if we extended our health insurance for one year and went across the border and back on the last day our visa is valid they will stamp us in for one year. All is well that ends well.

That may be the case for some, but our insurance is still valid and did not start until the day we entered Thailand, it matches the period of our visas. The I/O in charge said the problem was that we could not prove we had valid insurance because we did not have the insurance documents with us. That was my fault, I assumed we didn't need the documents because the e-visa stamp was in our passport and I thought that was proof enough that we met all of the requirements, such as having had the notice of visa approval and insurance documents on our first entry into the country.

My wife and I have (or had) valid Non-O O/A Multiple Entry E-Visas acquired in the States. We went back to the States for three months and upon re-entry at Savarnabhumi yesterday we were asked for proof of insurance and also for the Visa approval confirmation sent to us when we applied for the visa. This was the first time we had re-entered through Swampy on the e-visas, we had always had the old visa stickers before, and additional paperwork had never been required, I didn't understand that even with a valid multiple entry visa in our passports they would require additional documents, so I didn't have them. I was only able to show them the visa approval letter that was still in my phone, but that was not sufficient and they stamped us in for thirty days, telling us to sort things out at our local Immigration office (NongKhai), or go to Savanahket to get a new visa. I thought I was up on all of the new requirements, but I totally missed this one. It is my hope that others may benefit from our experience and be sure to bring your e-visa approval letter and proof of insurance when re-entering Thailand on multiple re-entry O/A visas, even if you have not had any problems previously. (My wife had been across to Laos and back in at the bridge with no troubles).