earthpig

And well Thailand should hedge its bets. Barack Hussein has turned on his allies everywhere because he hates the American Empire and is actively seeking its dismantlement.

However, this will all change once Americans decide to elect a President once again. The Thai American alliance will rise again under Trump.

The political brilliance of Trump is that he has made front and center of his campaign the ending of America's multiculturalist horror, similar to the one that engulfed the Roman Empire and its European successor today.

America must build the Trump Wall, repel the barbarians in our midst, and pour boiling oil on the millions of barbarians at the gates.

And for his crimes against the American people, Obama must be put on trial after/if he steps down and dealt with in a manner the French did with their Obama, Laval.

The right ignores or dismisses that the vast majority of Americans across the political parties and beliefs have wanted Congress to pass immigration reform, not to build immigration walls.

Which of course is why the Right has sizable majorities in both houses of the Congress, and if it had a Parliamentary system of democracy, the Prime Minister would be a Republican.

The Moslem, be it Shitte or Sunni, blame the pathos of its existence on the West, and its core symbol, America. Like the similar Nazi pathology, this is ingrained and cannot be reformed; a virus resistant to all influence save extirpation

In an ever shrinking, fissile world, the time is long past to understand that this can only end in great flashes of light, so brilliant they will be seen on distant planets.

It is only left to be determined if the West has the courage to take the necessary action before it is so destroyed. This is the great unspoken issue of the 2016 American election.

Yet another example of the catastrophe that happens when homosexuals are put in positions of trust over young boys. It didnt work for the Catholics and wont for the Buddhists nor any other group.

The time is long past to end the spin that homosexuals are "gay". They constitute a real and present danger to male youth, and steps are long overdue here and in many other countries to limit their access to the innocent.

Research shows that many homosexuals were themselves raped as children and much like HIV transmission, it takes one to make a new one. Our hearts must go out to all these victims, and to the perp himself due to the likely crimes committed against him in his past. But employment discrimination against homosexuals remains fundamental to our most sacred of duties, protection of the innocent.

If Trump restores Christmas, then surely he will restore marriage, ban fetal murder, and ban homosexuals from the armed forces as well as deranged drag queens from the bathrooms of the opposite sex, In other words, he will end the nightmare of President elected for the color of his skin and not the content of his character.

And with a ten point lead over Hellary in the polls, Christmas is coming to a Starbucks cup near you.

All hail the political genius behind this news: Nigel Farage.

The Conservatives are too in bed with the Industrialists to finally break with the abomination that is Europe. It will take a Farage premiership to finally lead Britain to save itself.

What appeared obvious from Thai television, but not from the photo above, is that our savage of the day is not only a butcher but a katoey as well. These people are walking mental illness cases, and Thai society is full of them. That is sad, and dangerous enough, but when we must factor in the attractiveness of permissive, maipenrai Thailand to foreign sexual deviants as well, it become clear that Thailand is a particularly dangerous place.

Thai Immigration should do much more to protect its citizens from this type of foreign threat.

I wonder how many people die each day from non-natural causes ? 2nd in the world for road deaths, an unusually high number of "suicides" and all manner of deaths related to drugs,drink,domestic violence and so on. It's got to be a shocking figure when totted up. Ultimately too many Thai men are just morons with no self control.

Not so shocking in comparison

Thailand on a level with USA in homicides p capita. 106th place from 216 Countries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

Thailand on a level with USA in suicide p capita 50+ place from 170 countries

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

Thailand may have only a 10% higher homicide rate compared to the USA of REPORTED homicides, but when you consider what percentage of actual homicides here are actually reported as such, I doubt the true homicide rates are at all close.

you claudius,

The BBC is an extremist propaganda organ of Eurodecadence, championing the usual secular suspects of gittish income redistribution, murderous pacifism and sexual perversity. In so doing it is no different from other publications found throughout "gayropa", with the exception that the clapped out British subsidize this Heinous Horror Show with their tax quid, which certainly betrays that refined masochism in the national character that heretofore had been best exemplified in their national cuisine.

If you keep substantial money in your office or home, let no one Thai know about it. No one. The simple act of buying a safe for use at home or office can make you a marked man.

You are right to be concerned about substantial assets in a country with no effective legal system. So do what rich Thais do: put a percentage of your liquid wealth in Singapore. Use one of the banks there with a branch in Thai.

Your friend is missing the point. The problem is not the child.

The real problem instead will be his wife. She grew up in the same house and was raised by the same kwai as her daughter, right?

What are the odds that the husband will find his wife's behavior to be acceptable once he rejoins his society with her? Or that she will be happy? Not impossible, but only a fool would take those odds.

Do your friend a huge favor. Tell him to stay in Thailand.

Or get on with his life.

Any one who drives in Bangkok--no, breathes in Bangkok--without packing heat is playing Thai roulette.

At the Nurnberg Trials, a certain Julius Streicher was hung as a war criminal. His indictment included no charge of murder. The judgment read, in part: " In his speeches and articles, week after week, month after month, he infected the German mind with the virus of anti-Semitism, and incited the German people to active persecution."

There is no question that Streicher's anti Semitism was an abomination. But either his hanging was also an abomination, or what these terrorists did in Paris was justified. I assure you, I don't think the latter to be the case.

What the terrorists did was wrong, full stop. What the French magazine wrote or drew was also wrong, full stop. While their sins are hardly equal, and the cartoonists harsh punishment completely undeserved, we should not relegate punishment of incitement only to our defeated enemies.

I congratulate the OP for an intelligent article on an important subject. His central thesis that the high rates of slaughter on Thai roads is connected with high motorcycle usage is worth noting, but several other observations and implications are in my view flawed.

The central statistical flaw is not introducing the concept of miles driven into cross border comparisons. This is very important. US average miles per year are some 50% greater than in many European countries, for example, and account for most of the difference in rates of accidents and even life expectancy. Any conclusions about relative safety of Thai versus US automobile driving need to take this into account.

Empirical observations comparing two places also has to be made with a certain humbleness when it comes to drawing conclusions. The author doenst live in Bangkok and finds drivers better wherever he does live in Thailand compared to where ever he does live in the USA. I do live in Bangkok, have lived in in five countries including the USA, and find drivers here the worst of them all by an order of measure. The OP is not wrong; nor am I. These are our differing opinions, based on differing life experiences. But neither observation, by itself, is terribly useful in drawing comparisons.

That's why the OP's main emphasis on hard stats is refreshing.

There is however the OP makes which is simply preposterous:

" I also find the joy of riding a motorcycle to be well worth the risk, since Im gonna die anyway. At the end of the day, I understand that I am responsible for keeping myself alive. Its not up to the other guy."

True in some circumstances, but in other circumstances this attitude may one day cost him his life. If he truly values his life less than the thrill of all those horses running thru his hands, then that is surely his business. But short of finding employment as a terrorist, it is about as stunning a denunciation of the value of human life that you could find anywhere.

I hope the OP comes to his senses. Good luck to him.

Seriously who goes on vacation with travel insurance. Travel ins. is a scam.

There are two types of travel insurance: medical coverage and coverage for a wide variety of other problems, such as when you luggage is lost. I would not call either a scam, but I certainly believe, after thorough research, that the other variety isn't worth it.

But travel medical insurance is to me as important as my passport.

If it doesn't bother you to potentially become a burden on society or your family, by all means, skip the travel medical insurance. Just imagine, with the proceeds saved you could even spend a night in Bangkok making your hard man humble, bareback.

Anyone who has tried driving in Russia knows that a motor vehicle and a Ruskie don't mix well at all. Wouldn't be surprised if pretty soon more of them die holidaying in Thailand than Brits.

A man commits a robbery slapping the victim across the face, then not only resists arrest but punches the arresting police officer who, in self defense, shoots the perp.

Another 350 lbs, 6'4" tall perp resists arrest for obviously committing a crime, forcibly resists arrest, and is accordingly forcibly subdued.

Both perps die.

These deaths are is not remotely tragedies, though it is certainly beyond sad what their survivors are experiencing.

What is tragic is the fate of the Ferguson police officer, a fate likely to be shared by the New York cop. These two, and society generally, are the victims here.

The time is long past for society itself to stand its ground.

But Brits are raised on the fable of a competent properly-funded well-equipped patient-focused national health-service, they ought to know better, and be just a tad more cynical/worldly.

Last I looked, the NHS had a five year cancer survival rate that was 15-20% rate lower than in the USA. That translated into some 6,000 needless deaths per year, all sacrificed on the altar of socialist fantasy. But what is even more stunning than NHS incompetence is the blind ignorance displayed by many Brits in not understanding how poor their system is, at least on this comparison, with that of other countries. British health care, it turns out, is indeed a pretty good primer for private health care in Thailand.

And no word of the man who, through his wars, internal repressions and diversion of food resources away from Iraqi children to bribe European and UN politicians, was responsible for an estimated 2.5 million deaths, or around 100k for each of his 25 years in power?

Yes, whereas Bush won the war now Obama has lost the peace. Yes, there were bad apples at Blackwater and elsewhere.

And yes, the world is still better off without Saddam.

There is nothing remotely hateful about what Putin is saying:

"It has nothing to do with persecuting people for their non-traditional orientation," Putin said Friday. "My personal position is that society must keep children safe."

Mr. Putin is not the only person with that position, and I for one congratulate him for it. As I suspect the vast majority of humanity would as well.

By the way, remember how in the lead up to Sochi all the homosexual apologists were arguing that after the olympics the sky would fall in on homosexuals in Russia? It turned out to be silly nonsense.

And the only hate displayed by either side in this affair.

A person who tarts up his carnal desires as a "civil right" is also a bigot. For what greater hate is there than to debase that concept which protects us all from tyranny? It is a hate directed at the very basis of civilization.

At Valley Forge, where it might be argued he had better things to do, Washington took time out to prosecute one of his men for "buggery." Why: to undermine the very freedoms for which he and his soldier were freezing to death defending?

Quite the contrary, Washington understood that there is no point to fight for freedom if you do not defend civil society.

The great enlightenment figures, including the American Founding Fathers, didnt argue for homosexuality as a civil right. The documents of the great American and French revolutions dont argue for it. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 didnt grant the status of civil right to homophiles, any more than it did to necrophiles, zoophiles, pedophiles or ephobophiles. And why is that?

Homosexuality is not a right, It is a behavior, a behavior which the vast bulk of social science research shows to correlate to one of the least happy existences imaginable. I'm gay; my heart goes out to the many homosexuals who clearly are not. They certainly deserve a measure of compassion. Love the sinner as we hate the sin.

But to grant civil rights status to a behavior with such personally disasterous consequences would be an indefensible encouragement to vulnerable youth to follow this saddest of all of life's paths.

That's not hate. Its love.

Who would like to drop earthpig in the middle of mardi gras, with no map, telephone or clothes?

So, gentle OxfordWill, you fanatasize about penetration of anal sex virgins do you? Particularly-- it would appear from your words--ones that are lost and helpless.

That wouldnt include anyone under age would it?