Jump to content

Skywalker69

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    6,845
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Skywalker69

  1. I have a question or 2 for the Suthep supporters.

    Did he give the green light to the military to use deadly force on the people?

    When was the last time in your country did the Deputy PM with the ok of the PM give the green light to the military to use deadly force on protesters with a similar death toll and it was ok, justified, and no case to answer?,

    Is there any equipment, tool, technology out there that is affective in combination that is NON-LEATHLE that could have cleared the protesters over the same time frame?

    And lastly Just what is the maximum number of innocent protesters, emergency volunteer's, and journalist's deaths in ok or justifiable to use deadly force to put down the few violent radicals?

    Now the challenge for the supporters for the masquerading monk is to answer each of the questions and not deflect, spin, or just BUT BUT BUT the man in Dubai drivel.

    The order was to fire on armed people, very similar RoE to regular police, no armed people, no orders to authorize the use of live ammunition. Simple as that.

    If you want to see how security forces respond to armed men firing back there are plenty of examples, latest I could refer to is the killing of three hostage takers in Paris earlier this year, or the killing of a gunman in Sydney not long ago, or going back some time I could refer to Waco, Texas, etc, etc... The point being is, you shoot at security forces, you become fair game. Again, simple as that.

    Non-lethal means were tried before, that stopped when the MiB (and regular "Peaceful Protesters") started using live ammunition against security forces, and these "few violent radicals" were mingling freely among protesters, acting behind their barricades protected by their smokescreens. When you have people aiding and abetting criminals they become complicit to the crime. If on top of that they behave like imbeciles like the "Peaceful Protestors" in this video they have no-one to blame but themselves if they ended up getting shot:

    Now you go behind a barricade and point a metal tube at soldiers that have been on the receiving end of M72 grenade attacks and see how well you fare, or do like the moron pretending to fire an automatic weapon after setting off a string of fireworks. Surprise surprise, one got shot, if it wasn't their intention they surely did out of sheer stupidity every single possible thing to get an "Unnarmed Protestor" shot at.

    By the way, take note of the child being used to set off the launching tube that, again, could be very easily taken for the barrel of a grenade launcher. If that kid would had ended up death whose fault would it had been?

    You want to see what become of the attempts to use non-lethal means? at 0:43, that thing the guy is using to fire rockets is the nozzle from a water cannon truck dismantled by the "Peaceful Protestors".

  2. Yu'p men in black, they were there absolutely no question.

    The question is, were they the ones that started the shooting? if so where they provoked or were they defending themselves?

    Were they all there for the redshirts or is it possible SOME were planted there to cause trouble therefor justifying the deadly response? A tactic commonly used!

    And after several court rulings that the military were responsible for many deaths.

    Was any video evidence of military firing at unarmed protectors shown to the commission? or was it only selected videos shown? We all know the answer to that one.

    Any video evidence of the emergency volunteer's in the temple being targeted?

    How about the shooting of journalist's? and a certain general shot in the head by a sniper, was that shown?

    Australia has had some big protests before but has a habit of NOT calling in the military to shoot and kill people.

    So just how is the government of the day NOT responsible for the deaths?

    And finally for the record yet again, I have NO support RED or YELLOW for those that use violence on innocent protesters and volunteers to achieve their political will.

    But isn't that exactly what was sanctioned by the government on the day? use deadly force.

    One blackshirt to another. - Let's go to Bangkok and defend ourselfs. Yea sure.
    • Like 1
  3. And the saga goes on and on.........

    Nongkaikid, was right when he said that they should shut their mouths and only open them when they have some results.

    At the moment they are releasing statements full of speculations and nothing robust.

    We don't want to be reassured that you are trying to do your job, after all that's what you are paid for........just give us results.

    Are you upset because the arrested person doesn't meet the profile of a redshirt?

    Were does it say that he is not a redshirt?

    Profile of a redshirt according to the experts of TVF: Uneducated impoverished northerner.

    And the arrested man is an educated southerner with a decent wage, albeit modest. The icing on the cake is that the two latest detainees are not Buddhist. BTW, when did the UDD ever have any support in Pattani? It is hardly Redshirt country is it?

    You keep clutching at straws, but the hope of blaming redshirts for this event linked to a labour dispute is getting fainter every day.

    So were does it say that he is not a redshirt? Clutching for straws? Pot.....kettle.....black.

  4. Thais make big news with a tortoise bust while car bombs are being exploded in tourist shopping malls and the Thai police don't have a clue.

    Noitom... humans aren't an endangered species. We are a danger to ourselves and everything around us, but we are not an endangered species.

    One day nature will get back at us, humans.

  5. The Angonoka is a pretty big tortoise but even if it is highly endangered who would pay 180K baht for a tortoise?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angonoka_tortoise

    Who would pay 180k? People with a lot more money than me (perhaps us). The rarer an animal is, then the more valuable it is. It's no different from any other commodity.

    There is a red shirt leader in the a naboring village, he has so many rear birds mostly parrots Blue macaw´s, Red macaw´s, Red winged macaw´s, Great green macaw´s also different Cockatoos, and Lories and a lot of other birds that I have never seen before.

    We are talking big big money here.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...