James105

So Labour have lost the pensioners, the farmers, the middle class parents who sent kids to private school, the small/large businesses, the white working class, the disabled, the trans and now they have lost the muslims and the Anti-Semitic jew haters on the left who will now go to the Jamas party (I presume it will be named after one terrorist group or another). And they are going to raise taxes in the autumn, probably penalizing the people who work hard and pay tax, which is when they lose the rest of the middle class, even the ones who go to Glastonbury. This will drop Labour to around about 16-18% which is basically the public sector workers giving them about 40-50 seats. Enjoy the demise of the UK whilst you can UK haters, as this nightmare is going to end in 2029.

If you think some kind of test needs to take place to know if Mr Thomas should or should not be competing against women may I suggest you visit Specsavers. Also, the doctor records it on the birth certificate when they observe the sex at birth and since that cannot change then this will be sufficient when they register for the competitive sport they wish to participate in. "But what if someone fakes their birth certificate". That is cheating and fraud and should be punished accordingly.

So you think that by paying extra tax to subsidize the green billionaires and being forced to restrict your own lifestyle in some way would change any of that? Climate panickers have no imagination. They seem to think that the technology we have today is all we will ever have to solve problems. 100 years ago they would think the giant telephone in peoples houses had peaked and could not imagine ever making a phone call untethered from a house or a phone box, let alone having a computer in their pockets that has more processing power than NASA used for the moon landings. Everyone wants cleaner skies and when the technology evolves to make that happen people will choose to buy it. It will happen naturally. I object to subsidizing inefficient provision of energy so politicians, China and rich people can get richer.

Climate changes over millions of years. To rely on (probably) manipulated data over the last few decades and then use that to model what is going to happen in 100 years (despite admitting the data wasn't good enough 60 years ago), to draw conclusions on such a small data set is quite the leap of faith in the climate alarmist community. There was a record breaking heat wave in the 70s. There will probably be less warm summers in the next decade. It's called weather. Something humans have notoriously never been able to accurately predict even in the next day or 2 let alone 100 years which is why all these climate predictions have been wildly wrong and will continue to be so. You would have been panicking (if you were around) about the upcoming ice age in the 70s. Now you are panicking about global warming. Some people are just very weak to propaganda. Which is great for the rich and the powerful as they rely on you (and people like you) to keep spreading this propaganda to keep them rich. Yes, follow the money.

100 years you say? We only just escaped an ice age a mere 50 years ago so yes it does seem that climate scam changes super fast. It's warming now you say? It's a scam. Follow the money.

The reason most don't believe it is the climate has changed many times on this planet before man existed and will continue to do so. Climate change is real and happening (very, very, very slowly just as it always has done) and pretending that we are responsible for it is a King Canute level of hubris. The only thing "man made" is the desire to profit and have the gullible pay the powerful who make money from the fear mongering. The rich and the powerful are grateful for your contribution to their cause of making more and more money.

...and the Romans should pay compensation to Britain yes? Or would that be silly as no-one in Britain or Australia today is suffering the effects of being conquered by a superior force (as all nations have on this planet) and since time travel is still impossible there isn't anything anyone can do to change it. Perhaps they (and you) should grow up and make the best of things as they are today and be grateful for the infrastructure those superior conquering forces provided.

I almost had a lapse where I sort of started to feel sorry for her, then I remembered she lied to get a position she is so clearly not qualified for and is completely out of her depth. I do feel sorry for her victims though, such as the farmer who killed himself so she couldn't get her money grabbing hands on the farm he wanted to pass down to his kids, or the pensioners who died before their time after the winter fuel payment cuts, or others who have and will suffer greatly due to her incompetence. I didn't see her shed any tears when she was inflicting harm onto others so if she is suffering then she probably needs to point the finger of blame at karma for that. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2epp4nyz8o

That's exactly what I said. The Saville file "never crossed his desk" (nudge, nudge, wink, wink). Fascinating how the highest of high profile nonces did not make it onto the desk of the head of the CPS, some would suggest it's simply unbelievable. Boris was a liar but Starmer is objectively more of a liar. Ask the WASPI women, the pensioners, the working people, the farmers, the disabled, the businesses (small and large), his own party and the lies he told to get the leadership of the party, the parents of kids who expected him to abolish the 2 child cap, the IFS and the "black hole". I can't actually think of a single thing that he has said that is even close to the truth - can you? As he has such a penchant for lying, I simply don't believe the Saville file didn't cross his desk, not for a nanosecond. If you are gullible enough to believe him about this then perhaps you might be interested in purchasing some land on the moon I have for sale...

One of the bees has been found impersonating a police officer.

The chances of this being terrorism is about as likely as some far right thuggery occurring because of incitement by a Lucy Connolly tweet. If Saville got a free pass for noncery under his "leadership" in the CPS, then I tend to wonder if he has an Epstein style black book containing the activities of other deviants in positions of power that also coincidentally "didn't come across his desk". Just speculation of course as I find it difficult to comprehend how someone so devoid of personality and competence has managed to leverage himself into such a position of power. It would be incredibly difficult (outside of Glastonbury of course) to find anyone, literally anyone, less competent than this moron.

Labour do not have female PMs as they are a bunch of hypocrites. If Starmer goes he will be replaced with a white man. That said, they might have already had their first gay PM, but the media seems to be sitting on (or prevented from) investigating why exactly 3 rent boys set about setting fire to his properties, or why lord Alli was plying him with gifts. So that would be something that they can hold over the Tories if that ever actually get made public. Fascinating how we had weeks of 24/7 news coverage about Boris eating a cake on his birthday, yet there is complete silence on Starmer with a far more intriguing scandal. It could make someone wonder just how many cases (of a Saville nature) he must have covered up or sat on when he was director of CPS to have such influence over what the media chooses to focus on or getting judges to issue D notices.

Did you need that court ruling to find out what a woman was too? Bless.

You have this incorrect. Ofcom considers "climate alarmism" as a settled scientific issue so does not require balance from the broadcasters to provide the opposing view. They consider whether or not a woman can actually have a penis as a "not settled" issue so require broadcasters to provide an alternative view. So if someone says "women cannot have a penis" on TV then they have to provide some fantasist on to say that women can indeed, have a penis. The supreme court settled this. Ofcom should not encourage law breaking by having people on TV who suggest its fine for men to compete in women's sports or use women's single sex spaces.

So the Tories have proven that they cannot be trusted, and Labour are presiding over the worst and most detested government since records began, raising taxes, borrowing even more, lowering growth, increasing illegal immigration and now have a puppet as the PM who cannot implement changes despite the large majority. I suspect actual headless chickens would not have fared any worse. You think voting for either of these imbecilic parties again is a better option? Crikey.