James105

100 years you say? We only just escaped an ice age a mere 50 years ago so yes it does seem that climate scam changes super fast. It's warming now you say? It's a scam. Follow the money.

The reason most don't believe it is the climate has changed many times on this planet before man existed and will continue to do so. Climate change is real and happening (very, very, very slowly just as it always has done) and pretending that we are responsible for it is a King Canute level of hubris. The only thing "man made" is the desire to profit and have the gullible pay the powerful who make money from the fear mongering. The rich and the powerful are grateful for your contribution to their cause of making more and more money.

...and the Romans should pay compensation to Britain yes? Or would that be silly as no-one in Britain or Australia today is suffering the effects of being conquered by a superior force (as all nations have on this planet) and since time travel is still impossible there isn't anything anyone can do to change it. Perhaps they (and you) should grow up and make the best of things as they are today and be grateful for the infrastructure those superior conquering forces provided.

I almost had a lapse where I sort of started to feel sorry for her, then I remembered she lied to get a position she is so clearly not qualified for and is completely out of her depth. I do feel sorry for her victims though, such as the farmer who killed himself so she couldn't get her money grabbing hands on the farm he wanted to pass down to his kids, or the pensioners who died before their time after the winter fuel payment cuts, or others who have and will suffer greatly due to her incompetence. I didn't see her shed any tears when she was inflicting harm onto others so if she is suffering then she probably needs to point the finger of blame at karma for that. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2epp4nyz8o

That's exactly what I said. The Saville file "never crossed his desk" (nudge, nudge, wink, wink). Fascinating how the highest of high profile nonces did not make it onto the desk of the head of the CPS, some would suggest it's simply unbelievable. Boris was a liar but Starmer is objectively more of a liar. Ask the WASPI women, the pensioners, the working people, the farmers, the disabled, the businesses (small and large), his own party and the lies he told to get the leadership of the party, the parents of kids who expected him to abolish the 2 child cap, the IFS and the "black hole". I can't actually think of a single thing that he has said that is even close to the truth - can you? As he has such a penchant for lying, I simply don't believe the Saville file didn't cross his desk, not for a nanosecond. If you are gullible enough to believe him about this then perhaps you might be interested in purchasing some land on the moon I have for sale...

One of the bees has been found impersonating a police officer.

The chances of this being terrorism is about as likely as some far right thuggery occurring because of incitement by a Lucy Connolly tweet. If Saville got a free pass for noncery under his "leadership" in the CPS, then I tend to wonder if he has an Epstein style black book containing the activities of other deviants in positions of power that also coincidentally "didn't come across his desk". Just speculation of course as I find it difficult to comprehend how someone so devoid of personality and competence has managed to leverage himself into such a position of power. It would be incredibly difficult (outside of Glastonbury of course) to find anyone, literally anyone, less competent than this moron.

Labour do not have female PMs as they are a bunch of hypocrites. If Starmer goes he will be replaced with a white man. That said, they might have already had their first gay PM, but the media seems to be sitting on (or prevented from) investigating why exactly 3 rent boys set about setting fire to his properties, or why lord Alli was plying him with gifts. So that would be something that they can hold over the Tories if that ever actually get made public. Fascinating how we had weeks of 24/7 news coverage about Boris eating a cake on his birthday, yet there is complete silence on Starmer with a far more intriguing scandal. It could make someone wonder just how many cases (of a Saville nature) he must have covered up or sat on when he was director of CPS to have such influence over what the media chooses to focus on or getting judges to issue D notices.

Did you need that court ruling to find out what a woman was too? Bless.

You have this incorrect. Ofcom considers "climate alarmism" as a settled scientific issue so does not require balance from the broadcasters to provide the opposing view. They consider whether or not a woman can actually have a penis as a "not settled" issue so require broadcasters to provide an alternative view. So if someone says "women cannot have a penis" on TV then they have to provide some fantasist on to say that women can indeed, have a penis. The supreme court settled this. Ofcom should not encourage law breaking by having people on TV who suggest its fine for men to compete in women's sports or use women's single sex spaces.

So the Tories have proven that they cannot be trusted, and Labour are presiding over the worst and most detested government since records began, raising taxes, borrowing even more, lowering growth, increasing illegal immigration and now have a puppet as the PM who cannot implement changes despite the large majority. I suspect actual headless chickens would not have fared any worse. You think voting for either of these imbecilic parties again is a better option? Crikey.

18% of prisoners are muslim. Since the religion of peace is not the religion of peace (a fact that Tommy Robinson has been stating for 2 decades now) he cannot be amongst the muslim prisoners as they will probably kill him since they are, you know, so peaceful. Contempt of court is a non violent civil offense and the sentence should have been carried out in an low security or open prison with other non-violent offenders where he would not have needed to be segregated and suffered the inhumane conditions of solitary confinement for such a long time. Pretending to yourself that this kind of sentence and this kind of inhumane punishment is normal doesn't make it reality. Anyway 2-tier justice has once again been confirmed in the UK. The mental gymnastics required to pretend this is not happening could start to cause brain hemorrhages so try and be careful.

Reform have pledged to make big savings on the net zero scam and deporting illegal immigrants and also stopping the invasion of illegal immigrants. If they have any sense then they will also remove any and all benefits for all foreign nationals that have not made at least 10 years worth of contributions. Thats a lot of savings potentially. Labour had 14 years to prepare for this and have demonstrably failed to manage the cost of their promises, kept or unkept, in their manifesto. They are taxing more and spending more (causing lower growth) than the last government and since they only are able to attract the adult equivalent of student activists into the party they are finding it impossible to make the needed cuts. Why do you hold Reform to a higher standard than Labour?

Being gay these days is an accepted norm (muslim countries excepted of course). It's not "hostile" and because it is so normalized the "gay times" would be just as relevant as the "left handed times" if it existed. If they jumped on the trans bandwagon then they only have themselves to blame as a movement that cheats at sport, mutilates kids and invades womens spaces was only ever going to have a short lifetime. They were probably popular as they existed in a time before gay rights existed in the west. Maybe they should start again in the middle east to replicate their past success.

Yes I remember this and the incessant wailing from the left. People don't want to vote for a party that promise to make cuts to wasteful spending (that Tory government being the obvious exception), they vote for those who promise to spend yet more money that far outweighs the tax income. Reform also seem to be falling into this trap as it is the only way to gain power. It's quite frankly a fundamental problem with a democratic system where people vote for what they can get for themselves rather than what is beneficial for the wider country as a whole and/or the future generations. Maybe it's time to embrace a cold and calculating AI to run the country that cannot be swayed by the whingeing and that does not pander to those who contribute the least, and cannot be bribed by lobbyists or self interested parties. That's not a serious point, but the way the UK has been run for the last few decades is clearly unsustainable and I have no doubt an IMF bailout is on the cards before too long along that comes with crippling and forced cuts to every single welfare system.