SGD
-
Posts
869 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by SGD
-
-
Can the Thai brain cope with 120kph because it doesn't seem able to cope with 110kph now.
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, blackcab said:This scheme appears to be: spend millions buying a property, then pay the government even more money for permission to live in it.
I think the big problem is that buying a property in Thailand gives a foreigner no right to stay or enter the country.
Recently we saw property owners locked out of Thailand during covid restrictions when other categories of foreigners were allowed in. So after spending millions of baht, property owners had the door slammed in their face.
Very good point.
They also make is stupidly difficult to stay in Thailand even if you have bought a property. I know you will all say about X days reporting but it isn't necessary in the 21st century. It is a hark back to the paperwork trail of the 19th century.Something has to give and if it isn't the Thai government, then it is the other side of the equation.
Take me for example. I was tentatively looking at a condo (I don't live there enough days to keep a house secure) but when I am there, I stay in 5* hotels and I enjoy that luxury. So being an analytical type of guy, I put together a spreadsheet ????
Versus renting a condo, then even at 20k per month, I would need to stay 90 plus days at an average £80 plus a night for the condo to break even.
Versus buying a condo, then assuming the same 20k a month condo is available for purchase at 4m (£100k) and I can get 6% net on investments, then my £100k gives me £6k which is 240k baht which matches the annual rental of the same condo. And I keep my liquidity.
So I can already rent the same condo for the lost income on investments from buying it. Thus, my only upside is capital appreciation, which is often negative for new condos or an increase in rents, which can happen of course and the ability to knock nails into the walls of the condo I actually own.
There is a never ending supply of new condos so older units actually become better value over time and can make sound purchases.
However, to wrap up, unless you are living there substantially over 3 months a year, then even if you live in 5* hotels, you actually save money living in l;uxury than owning or renting your own condo.- 7
- 2
-
19 hours ago, golfpro47 said:
I have lived in Thailand 25 Years and Cambodia was my bolt hole when I needed a change , I visited many many times,usually for 1-2 weeks and always enjoyed my time there,the biggest mistake I made was moving over to Phnom Penh Full time.Looking for what I call a decent Condo/Apartment to Rent the ones I viewed were in the 450 600US,I had looked at what Barang were calling good Condos at 300-350US and they were shocking couldn’t believe how some Barang were living. I settled on a playyyce just over 2klms from the City Center,a brand new Building Furnished,they were looking for 650US I offered to pay 550US 6Months in advance and got it for that.
I didn’t find the food to bad(except the street food)plenty of Euro Restaurants prices decent,but really missed Thai Food.
what surprises me are that most of the comments by people who have lived there or have visited regularly is they nearly all say cheap beer,cheap and ready available drugs,I often wonder what kind of life they lead when they are the first 2 things they mention.
After about 6Months I was getting bored,relief was my Work as I was Working all around Asia,so at about 9-10 Months I decided I had had enough and moved back to Thailand.
Most of my friends I had there have also departed,some to Thailand,Vietnam and some back to Europe, I am told by people I still know there that they are also considering leaving,they are fed up with the usual things,dirty,attitude,Crime more prevalent and far to many Chinese now with there bad attitude,and of course getting more expensive.
Did I enjoy my long stay there no,did I enjoy my frequent visits prior to moving there most definitely,but my experience living there and the stories I am being told, I am glad I left when I did, I made a big mistake moving there and as such I have never been back.
Most guys reach for a beer with one hand and a girl with the other and they can apologise for anything and live in squalor if those needs are met.
I see guys living in Pattaya in rooms that girls today would be ashamed to live in. Cheap is good, cheap trumps all other questions.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
8 hours ago, simon43 said:Well, it seems very few would consider moving to live in Laos. I'm genuinely interested to know why. Please tell.
I can only relate to living in Luang Prabang. I would not want to live in Vientiane - it has changed for the worse since I used to visit a decade or so ago. Other rural locations in the country are indeed, too 'rural' for my liking. But LP works great for me ????
I lived in Buriram for a year. I had a nice enough house, a car, truck, home life was ok. So why did I hate it ?
Almost every foreigner living there was doing so because they were too poor to live where they really wanted and this was back in time when £1 got you well over Bt60. If a tin of beer went up 25 satang that was the topic of conversation for the day.
The locals were a mixed bunch. Some resentment, some amusement, little understanding and largely just uninterested. Very little English spoken and even less outside restaurants etc.
There was clear evidence of the girls who were working as "cashiers" and "receptionists" in Bangkok, Phuket and Pattaya. Some oversized mansions built and often only half finished or left to rot; gold, cash and land far more useful than a large costly house to maintain.
I got bored, deadly bored. There simply wasn't enough of anything or anyone to make life worthwhile. In other places, it would be my choice to self isolate but up there, it was enforced because there wasn't anything else to do.
So I went to Bangkok a lot. Easy flights from Sateuk to Suvarnabhumi back then and often for Bt750 or so. Head back up when I wanted.
Contrast that with living in and around Ao Nang in Krabi and then moving to Koh Mook in the South Andaman. No electric, well, maybe 2 hours per day, so not hot water but didn't care. You ate whatever came out of the ocean and could be grown on the island. Occasional items came in from the mainland or you could take a trip or ask your restaurant guy to bring something when he went.
Beer was with ice and sure, you needed to get over seeing large blocks of ice being dragged along the ground and washed down. Never knew anyone get sick though. Food was ocean to table in hours so as fresh as could be. Evenings were spent without phones, TVs or internet and chatting, reading, listening to your fellow men and women was the order of the day.
I went back to Ao Nang and lasted 3 days before I turned around and went back to the islands.Of course, time has changed everywhere and for the worse but why all rural places worry me is that I feel I would have nothing to do and have so little in common with those around me and probably not even a common language. Laos looks great to see but I suspect boring to live. I am not one for temple watching nor climbing this or that to view another paddy field or mountain. Been there, done that.
What would Laos give me over Thailand in any aspect ?
- 4
- 1
-
Not often this question is sensibly asked and less so sensibly answered.
I am not tied to Thailand but I have never lived in Cambodia or Vietnam and haven't even been to Laos.
I have no desire for malls, no need for golf, eating local is fine though I do like spicy and I am content without 5* luxury. Medical is an issue but insurance and a couple of Plan Bs cover most of that.
Sadly, I cannot roll back the clock to the Thailand I fell in love with. The people have changed and the landscape pillaged for profit. I see that happening everywhere and nowhere is immune.
I study this argument with interest as I want to go to these places for a month or two but as I still have business in Europe then I am constrained by the amount of time I can get away in one trip and that is what, more than anything, makes me return to Thailand as I can relax on day one.
With so little time, were I to make plans say to go to Cambodia, then if I didn't want to stay there, I would have lost so much of my precious holiday getting back to Thailand and if I stayed there, then I would probably regret not going to Thailand - oh for days past when you could border hop at will ????
Yet I am aware that I could see myself asking the same question in 5 years time and regretting not going.
However, as I move toward retirement, I do want a real relationship again. That seems to preclude Laos but not Cambodia and presumably not the Philippines, which is also on the "spend a month or two there" list.
- 2
-
If I may ask a tag on question which I think has some relevance.
If I bring in 5m and get a FET and purchase a condo and then sell it for 10m but I wish to buy a new condo at 10m, is this an issue with my original FET only being for 5m and there being a period of time between the first purchase and the second purchase.It would seem illogical to have to bring in another 5m (or to send the second 5m or even the whole 10m on a holiday outside Thailand) but hey, TIT ????
-
You are only part way to the holy grail of answers.
Thailand treats income earned more than 12 months ago as capital and not income. This is key to the wider picture because of the dual taxation treaty, which also works when there is no tax to pay in the UK and hence, no tax to pay in Thailand.
You need to consider the issue of first VAT, then corporation tax and finally personal taxes on dividends over certain levels, which would give rise to personal taxation in the UK were they paid in the UK.
The whole answer is complex and needs careful understanding because the actual answer is very much dependent upon the sums involved, the time period you are thinking about and whether funds not taken out of a company can be better used than paying dividends and thus accruing tax liabilities.
If the numbers are small, you can self educate. If the numbers are more than £50k and less than £100/250k per year then you can get a mix of self education and professional advice. If over £100/250k then get advice. -
14 hours ago, JoePai said:
Thought they said no more of this type of promotion as so much money had been scammed ?
Clearly they haven't scammed enough ????
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Another click bait TV article.
There is noJust speculation and <deleted>.
- 18
- 2
- 1
-
The ownership versus rent debate is well known but all those crowing about rent saved and profits made are kindly forgetting that those who chose to rent (as opposed to those forced to rent) have kept their capital liquid and presumably invested and not hidden under he bed.
Chances are that dividend income and capital growth of said retained capital are higher than the rent saved and theoretical profit to be made from turning an illiquid Pattaya property back into money.
I am on the fence. I own and have rented but were I looking now for a single property to live in, it would have to be realistically priced (as some are) or I would take a long lease (2/3 years) on a heavily discounted luxury place.
Any purchase would have to made with a quasi yield to redemption basis of it not having any residual value and the enjoyment of the purchase being the sole reason for doing so.
-
6 hours ago, philba said:
Have a look at Arcadia Resort.
Lovely pools.
Pools look pretty good but only two configurations. Shoebox 25sqm or 50sqm where they cram in 2 bedrooms.
-
3 hours ago, wolf81 said:
View Talay 5 was nice imho, but can be hot in afternoon. Large square, great for making laps.
Agreed. less "resort" like than VT2 but decent contender. Issue (if applicable) about it being a ghost condo remain though.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, bkk6060 said:The Base has a pool on the roof long lap with full sun all day. If you do not like it, then it is probably your issue.
Sub 30sqm shoeboxes at the bottom end and then they try to fit 2 bedrooms into a studio sized 51sqm to 70sqm maximum.
80k per sqm to 140k per sqm is madness money compared to the alternatives.
On rentals, the shoebox issue and too many rooms crammed into too small a space issues remain but those aside, move off the bottom rung of 30sqm for 8/10k and you have 25k to 40k for 51sqm to 70sqm. Hardly good value.
Also, there are 1112 units in this building but space for about 8/12 people to sit on a sun lounger. Hmmm, let me think that one out for a minute. By contrast, VT2 has about 1000 units, though perhaps only 700 or so as many are doubles or triples and you could easily put 70 people around the massively larger pool.
The Base location is good, not great but good but the design is built for short term rentals, not living long term.- 3
- 1
-
5 hours ago, Nanaplaza666 said:
Just bought 1 in Dusit grand , good prices at the moment . A lot of square meters for your money and nice pool with enough sun . It's just of theppasit road about 2 kilometers to the beach .
Really at 60k plus per sqm ?
- 2
-
10 hours ago, jacko45k said:
What is wrong with the VT 5 buildings which are close to the beach and Thrappaya?
Fundamentally nothing wrong with it, except a bit overshadowed at times. I've stayed there and at night, it is a ghost town, well before Covid.
VT1, 2, even 3 are far more residential whilst 5 and up seem to have been bought by investors and are often 90% plus empty.- 1
-
11 hours ago, walt1 said:
For my tastes it's hard to beat VT2. In Pattaya the VT6 is OK.
Agreed, VT6 is ok and the development has good location, if higher priced than alternatives
- 1
-
My understanding is that whilst you can get divorced in Thailand, if you have been married for more than 12 months that will not be accepted by the UK courts and you would need to go through the process in the UK and thus the Thai stuff would be a waste of time, though you could complete it to make things legal in Thailand without having to go through the hoops of having an Amphur recognise a UK divorce.
I think if you Google this for the UK you will come up with this answer because that is where I got it from, some official government page, not from a internet forum.
-
First and last is a well used term for private rentals.
You put up two months rent to secure the property but you use one of those to pay the first month's rent and the last to pay the final month's rent, meaning that the landlord does not have to find money to refund any deposit.
Of course this leaves the landlord with no security in the last month which is why you will not see this written into modern contracts or with agents but it is still accepted practice as I know, having done this myself, from a tenant's perspective.
-
The start of the problem here is the contract your landlord agreed with the agent. A vast majority of standard contracts give the agent a further commission for extensions and often that is paid upfront, for the whole of the contract term, at renewal, which if say it was one month, would be covered by part of your deposit. In effect, your landlord is only getting 11 month's rent each year and the agent is collecting 1 month.
Therefore, the owner cannot vary this without putting themselves in a difficult position.
However, there is no law which states an extension has to be annual, even if the first contract was annual, unless that is an express provision in your original agreement, which you should have and could have objected to.
If you do not sign a new contract but simply continue to pay monthly, then that is also legal and the agent cannot force you out. However, they could put pressure on an inexperienced landlord who does not know what his true options are.
Your deposit is not at further risk because you do not sign an annual extension.
You can counter offer of course, stating that you will sign for another year but with a break clause only on your side at say 6 months, with 1 month's notice. This gives you security and flexibility but agents don't like it because they may have to pay back a commission if you leave early. The way round this is for you to make sure that the agent takes the commission on a monthly basis and does not request it up front.
Even if you stay, you can have a brand new contract drawn up. It does not have to be an extension of the existing one. The landlord can do the same with the agent.
-
On 2/11/2021 at 10:09 AM, blackcab said:
Q: Can we have a lien registered on the chanote, to "secure" our downpayment?
A: No. The property already has a mortgage registered against it, so no further encumbrance can be added without the permission of the original mortgagor. The original mortgagor will never agree to this.
The rights of a first charge holder are not in any way diminished by any subsequent charges as they rank in order after the preceding charge has been paid in full.
No legal or risk argument against multiple 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. mortgages. The risk is wholly with those not holding a first charge.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Trying to narrow down on a condo and I know that having a decent and usable swimming pool is something I like.
For example, small pools hidden between tall buildings often have little direct sunlight, the water can actually be cold and they are not often pleasant places to spend any amount of time. On the other hand, large open pools get a lot of light, are warm and the surrounding areas are not as overlooked and are more pleasant.
I find it hard to get over the View Talay 2 pools really and perhaps Chateau Dale but outside hotels (I love the Avani pool) then I am a bit lost when in central Pattaya, hence asking the audience ????
- 2
- 1
-
On 3/7/2021 at 7:20 AM, rcuthbert said:
Universe is a good deal. 2 squat racks, lots of dumbbells, two heavy bags, and it is well ventilated. It is a gay hangout, and very few gals train there, but it is a good functional iron house for focused training.
Thanks but not interested in Muscle Beach or gay hangout places.
- 1
-
On 3/6/2021 at 6:33 AM, suhoaswhas said:
I guess that you are such a champion that you need great quality gym...
Not at all. I just want to train in the best gym there is because I like new and maintained equipment, knowledgeable staff, a clean and air-conditioned environment and great facilities.
I used to train here, if you want a reference of what I am used to: https://www.thirdspace.london/canary-wharf/ -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Risks ? what risks ?
You are tested before you fly. You are tested after a couple of days. If clear, you can stay in the hotel grounds.Even after quarantine, you go anywhere and are meeting lots of people who have not been tested for anything and who could give you any number of communicable diseases but that is accepted.
The logic is flawed of course as you are no real risk at all after day 3 and this isn't the bubonic plague, just a little sniffle worse than a cold.In any case, people would demand a reduction in quarantine fees, which won't happen, so it will still look like a rip off.
However, look at my case. I am due in 16th April. If this changes, I get the grounds and not the room. I'd be upset if the whole quarantine was dumped and if I feel it will be, I will simply not fly to be the last person stuck in 65k of quarantine against a regular hotel price of 25k for the same period.But, as I have said since they introduced quarantine, it is easy to set up but very hard to remove. Once you set a date for change or removal, no-one will fly until it changes and that will trap some people in the last weeks of it who would not have had to suffer it if they had flown a week or two later.
- 2
- 1
- 1
Real estate: Foreigners told that 2021 is a Golden Year for investment in condos
in Thailand News
Posted
Sorry to give you the wake up call but if it was priced well, it would have generated interest and would probably have sold.
If your neighbours have theirs advertised for 150k per sqm it doesn't mean yours is worth 150k per sqm because theirs is simply overpriced. The price to move it in this market is perhaps 50k per sqm but you would think that stupidly undervalued. Yet that is the market price.
You may get more in the future and you will if the baht FX rates improve but contrast this. I have a near 100sqm condo in central London which is worth perhaps £1m. That makes it about £10k per sqm. You have your Bt200k per sqm condo in Bangkok which you think is worth £5k per sqm.
In which universe is London only worth twice the price of Bangkok ?